新兴市场国家基于价值的医疗保健和卫生技术评估:共同努力克服障碍。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482
Maximillian Otte, Hans Peter Dauben, Jeonghoon Ahn, Iñaki Gutierrez Ibarluzea, Michael Drummond, Steven Simoens, Zoltán Kaló, Dong-Churl Suh
{"title":"新兴市场国家基于价值的医疗保健和卫生技术评估:共同努力克服障碍。","authors":"Maximillian Otte, Hans Peter Dauben, Jeonghoon Ahn, Iñaki Gutierrez Ibarluzea, Michael Drummond, Steven Simoens, Zoltán Kaló, Dong-Churl Suh","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public-private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"1061-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value based healthcare and Health Technology Assessment for emerging market countries: joint efforts to overcome barriers.\",\"authors\":\"Maximillian Otte, Hans Peter Dauben, Jeonghoon Ahn, Iñaki Gutierrez Ibarluzea, Michael Drummond, Steven Simoens, Zoltán Kaló, Dong-Churl Suh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public-private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1061-1066\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2398482","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本文总结了来自新兴市场国家和成熟市场国家的医疗保健专家、学术界代表以及公共机构官员就基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)和卫生技术评估(HTA)所举办论坛的成果。专家们的发言深入剖析了当前的发展和挑战,随后进行了圆桌互动讨论。新兴市场拥有独特的医疗保健系统、患者群体、资源限制和需求:每个圆桌讨论都探讨了特定主题,包括 HTA 和真实世界证据 (RWE) 在医疗决策中的作用、生物仿制药价值评估中的挑战以及纳入非价格标准,这些标准反映了新兴市场与背景相关的具体情况,如医疗决策中价值的多面性,强调利益相关者的观点和系统的复杂性:RWE 对于理解生物仿制药的价值识别和决策过程非常重要,并对其应用和挑战提出了见解。专家建议在药品采购中使用多标准决策分析(MCDA),特别是针对非专利药品,强调了综合评估框架和坚持以价值为基础原则的重要性。总体研究结果为产业界、学术界和公共机构之间的合作提供了途径,以解决实施障碍,并通过公私合作、联合能力建设和培训计划以及知识转让,在新兴市场促进公平、高效和高质量的医疗保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Value based healthcare and Health Technology Assessment for emerging market countries: joint efforts to overcome barriers.

Introduction: This paper summarizes the results from a forum of healthcare experts, academia representatives, and public agency officials from emerging and established market countries on Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Presentations from experts provided insights into current developments and challenges, followed by interactive roundtable discussions. Emerging markets have unique healthcare systems, patient populations, resource constraints and needs.

Areas covered: Each roundtable explored specific topics including the role of HTA and Real-world evidence (RWE) in healthcare decision-making, challenges in biosimilar value assessment and incorporating non-price criteria reflecting context-related specifications of emerging markets such as the multifaceted nature of value in healthcare decision-making, emphasizing stakeholder perspectives and system complexities.

Expert opinion: RWE emerged as important in understanding biosimilar value recognition and decision-making processes, with insights into its applications and challenges. Recommendations were provided for utilizing Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in pharmaceutical procurement, particularly for off-patent medicines, underscoring the importance of comprehensive evaluation frameworks and adherence to value-based principles. Overall findings suggest avenues for collaboration between industry, academia, and public agencies to address implementation barriers and promote equitable, efficient, and high-quality healthcare systems in emerging markets through public-private partnerships, joint capacity building and training initiatives, and knowledge transfers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
期刊最新文献
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin plus standard treatment compared to standard therapy for the management of chronic kidney disease in Colombia. Usability of digital health devices in clinical trials. Next-generation sequencing in oncology: challenges in economic evaluations. Valuing quality of life for economic evaluations in cancer: navigating multiple methods. Technologies and decision-support tools for health systems management: a scoping review of features and use cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1