二十碳五烯酸与安慰剂作为慢性偏头痛的辅助疗法:随机对照试验。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1111/head.14808
Ghader Mohammadnezhad, Farhad Assarzadegan, Mohsen Koosha, Hadi Esmaily
{"title":"二十碳五烯酸与安慰剂作为慢性偏头痛的辅助疗法:随机对照试验。","authors":"Ghader Mohammadnezhad, Farhad Assarzadegan, Mohsen Koosha, Hadi Esmaily","doi":"10.1111/head.14808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test-6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test-6 in the EPA and placebo groups was -6.96 (3.34) and -4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) -9.76 (4.15) and -4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: -0.76 [1.13] and -0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eicosapentaenoic acid versus placebo as adjunctive therapy in chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ghader Mohammadnezhad, Farhad Assarzadegan, Mohsen Koosha, Hadi Esmaily\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test-6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test-6 in the EPA and placebo groups was -6.96 (3.34) and -4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) -9.76 (4.15) and -4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: -0.76 [1.13] and -0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14808\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14808","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估每天补充 2000 毫克二十碳五烯酸(EPA)对慢性偏头痛患者的疗效:背景:慢性偏头痛的特征是每月至少有 15 天头痛,因此有必要将重点放在预防性治疗策略上。EPA是一种多不饱和脂肪酸,被公认具有抗炎特性,本研究对其在慢性偏头痛治疗中的潜在有效性进行了研究:方法:对确诊为慢性偏头痛的合格参与者进行随机、盲法、安慰剂对照试验。干预组服用 1000 毫克 EPA,每天两次,连续服用 8 周;对照组服用两粒安慰剂软胶囊。4周和8周时记录症状。主要结果采用头痛影响测试-6来评估患者的变化。次要结果包括偏头痛天数、通过视觉模拟量表测量的头痛严重程度以及服用止痛药的次数。描述性分析以平均值(± 标准差 [SD])为单位进行报告:共有 60 名患者参与了研究,最终有 56 名患者按照方案完成了研究,其中包括 47 名女性(84%)。除了使用丙戊酸作为预防药物的患者人数(EPA 组 21 人,安慰剂组 13 人;P = 0.037)外,基线数据比较并未显示两组之间有任何显著差异。结果显示,8 周后,EPA 组和安慰剂组头痛影响测试-6 的平均(标度)差异分别为-6.96(3.34)和-4.43(5.24)(p = 0.084)。在偏头痛天数方面,参与者报告的头痛天数平均(标清)分别为-9.76(4.15)天和-4.60(4.87)天(p 结论:EPA 和安慰剂组的偏头痛天数分别为-6.96(3.34)天和-4.43(5.24)天(p = 0.084):本研究结果支持每天服用 2000 毫克 EPA 作为慢性偏头痛治疗的预防性药物疗法的潜力,特别是在减轻偏头痛发作、偏头痛天数和整体生活质量方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eicosapentaenoic acid versus placebo as adjunctive therapy in chronic migraine: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily 2000 mg eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) supplementation in individuals with chronic migraine.

Background: Chronic migraine is characterized by a minimum of 15 headache days/month, necessitating a focus on preventive treatment strategies. EPA, a polyunsaturated fatty acid recognized for its anti-inflammatory properties, is examined for its potential effectiveness in chronic migraine management.

Methods: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled trial of eligible participants with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic migraine were enrolled. The intervention group received 1000 mg of EPA twice daily for 8 weeks, while the control group received two placebo softgels. Symptoms were recorded at 4 and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was assessed using the Headache Impact Test-6 to evaluate changes in patients. Secondary outcomes encompassed migraine headache days, headache severity measured via a visual analog scale, and the number of consumed painkillers. Descriptive analyses were reported in mean (± standard deviation [SD]).

Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the study and finally, 56 patients completed the study according to the protocol, including 47 (84%) females. The data comparison at baseline did not show any significant difference between the two groups except in the number of patients using valproic acid as prophylaxis (21 patients in the EPA group, and 13 in the placebo group; p = 0.037). The results showed after 8 weeks, a mean (SD) difference of Headache Impact Test-6 in the EPA and placebo groups was -6.96 (3.34) and -4.43 (5.24), respectively (p = 0.084). Regarding migraine headache days, participants reported a mean (SD) -9.76 (4.15) and -4.60 (4.87) decline in days with headache, respectively (p < 0.001). The number of attacks per month after 8 weeks was 3.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-4.0) and 4.0 (95% CI 3.0-6.0), respectively (p < 0.001). Regarding severity, there was no significant difference between the two groups (mean [SD] difference: -0.76 [1.13] and -0.73 [1.04], respectively; p = 0.906). In terms of adverse events, two patients in the EPA group reported intolerable nausea and vomiting, and one patient in the placebo group reported dizziness.

Conclusions: This study's findings support the potential of a daily 2000 mg EPA as a prophylactic pharmacotherapy in chronic migraine management, specifically in mitigating migraine attacks, migraine headache days, and overall quality of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1