用于比较分析抽吸导管跟踪性能的体外方法。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1177/15910199241278993
Fritz Wodarg, Patrick Brouwer, Sarah Power, Michael Gilvarry, Mahmood Mirza, Richard Conlon, Sarah Johnson, Ray McCarthy
{"title":"用于比较分析抽吸导管跟踪性能的体外方法。","authors":"Fritz Wodarg, Patrick Brouwer, Sarah Power, Michael Gilvarry, Mahmood Mirza, Richard Conlon, Sarah Johnson, Ray McCarthy","doi":"10.1177/15910199241278993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) relies on efficient tracking of aspiration catheters through complex vascular anatomies. Differences in catheter design lead to variation in tracking performance which may only become apparent after use in patients. We developed an <i>in-vitro</i> methodology for evaluating aspiration catheter performance under a variety of pre-defined circumstances, that can be used during catheter development for design optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of the <i>in-vitro</i> methodology involved testing four large bore aspiration catheters on recreated challenging vascular access routes derived from patient angiograms. Two experienced neurointerventionalists conducted the tests under controlled physiological and procedural conditions. Each catheter design was evaluated across 30 unique anatomy-procedural set-up combinations. A fifth, prototype large bore catheter was evaluated by trained engineers to assess the applicability of the <i>in-vitro</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from statistical analysis using a general linear model demonstrated the methodology's effectiveness in detecting significant tracking differences among catheter designs (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Minimal inter-operator variability was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.304), while procedural techniques significantly influenced tracking performance (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The tortuosity of the arterial access route notably impacted catheter performance (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with anatomical features revealing varying degrees of influence on desirable and undesirable catheter design aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully developed a test methodology for evaluating the trackability of large bore aspiration catheters intended for treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions. This methodology offers a robust approach to pre-clinical design assessment, utilizing anatomical models that simulate real-world vascular challenges to enhance catheter optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241278993"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559955/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An <i>in-vitro</i> method for comparative analysis of aspiration catheter tracking performance.\",\"authors\":\"Fritz Wodarg, Patrick Brouwer, Sarah Power, Michael Gilvarry, Mahmood Mirza, Richard Conlon, Sarah Johnson, Ray McCarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241278993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) relies on efficient tracking of aspiration catheters through complex vascular anatomies. Differences in catheter design lead to variation in tracking performance which may only become apparent after use in patients. We developed an <i>in-vitro</i> methodology for evaluating aspiration catheter performance under a variety of pre-defined circumstances, that can be used during catheter development for design optimization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Validation of the <i>in-vitro</i> methodology involved testing four large bore aspiration catheters on recreated challenging vascular access routes derived from patient angiograms. Two experienced neurointerventionalists conducted the tests under controlled physiological and procedural conditions. Each catheter design was evaluated across 30 unique anatomy-procedural set-up combinations. A fifth, prototype large bore catheter was evaluated by trained engineers to assess the applicability of the <i>in-vitro</i> test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results from statistical analysis using a general linear model demonstrated the methodology's effectiveness in detecting significant tracking differences among catheter designs (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Minimal inter-operator variability was observed (<i>p</i> = 0.304), while procedural techniques significantly influenced tracking performance (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The tortuosity of the arterial access route notably impacted catheter performance (<i>p</i> < 0.01), with anatomical features revealing varying degrees of influence on desirable and undesirable catheter design aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully developed a test methodology for evaluating the trackability of large bore aspiration catheters intended for treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions. This methodology offers a robust approach to pre-clinical design assessment, utilizing anatomical models that simulate real-world vascular challenges to enhance catheter optimization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241278993\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559955/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241278993\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241278993","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:急性缺血性中风(AIS)的机械血栓切除术(MT)依赖于抽吸导管在复杂血管解剖中的有效追踪。导管设计的不同会导致追踪性能的差异,而这种差异只有在患者使用后才会显现出来。我们开发了一种体外方法,用于评估抽吸导管在各种预定义情况下的性能,该方法可在导管开发过程中用于优化设计:体外方法的验证包括在根据患者血管造影重新制作的具有挑战性的血管通路上测试四种大口径抽吸导管。两名经验丰富的神经介入专家在可控的生理和程序条件下进行了测试。每种导管设计都在 30 种独特的解剖-手术设置组合中进行了评估。训练有素的工程师对第五种原型大口径导管进行了评估,以评估体外测试的适用性:结果:使用一般线性模型进行统计分析的结果表明,该方法能有效检测出不同导管设计之间的显著追踪差异(p p = 0.304),而程序技术则对追踪性能有显著影响(p p 结论:我们成功开发出了一种测试方法,用于检测导管设计之间的显著追踪差异:我们成功开发了一种测试方法,用于评估大口径抽吸导管的可追踪性,该导管用于治疗大血管闭塞的急性缺血性中风。该方法为临床前设计评估提供了一种稳健的方法,它利用解剖模型模拟真实世界的血管挑战,以加强导管优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An in-vitro method for comparative analysis of aspiration catheter tracking performance.

Background and purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) relies on efficient tracking of aspiration catheters through complex vascular anatomies. Differences in catheter design lead to variation in tracking performance which may only become apparent after use in patients. We developed an in-vitro methodology for evaluating aspiration catheter performance under a variety of pre-defined circumstances, that can be used during catheter development for design optimization.

Methods: Validation of the in-vitro methodology involved testing four large bore aspiration catheters on recreated challenging vascular access routes derived from patient angiograms. Two experienced neurointerventionalists conducted the tests under controlled physiological and procedural conditions. Each catheter design was evaluated across 30 unique anatomy-procedural set-up combinations. A fifth, prototype large bore catheter was evaluated by trained engineers to assess the applicability of the in-vitro test.

Results: Results from statistical analysis using a general linear model demonstrated the methodology's effectiveness in detecting significant tracking differences among catheter designs (p < 0.01). Minimal inter-operator variability was observed (p = 0.304), while procedural techniques significantly influenced tracking performance (p < 0.01). The tortuosity of the arterial access route notably impacted catheter performance (p < 0.01), with anatomical features revealing varying degrees of influence on desirable and undesirable catheter design aspects.

Conclusion: We successfully developed a test methodology for evaluating the trackability of large bore aspiration catheters intended for treating acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusions. This methodology offers a robust approach to pre-clinical design assessment, utilizing anatomical models that simulate real-world vascular challenges to enhance catheter optimization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Balloon angioplasty for cerebral vasospasm in preschool children. Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience. Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio. Accelerated aspiration with Q™ catheter: An in vitro study. High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1