脑动静脉畸形破裂后早期栓塞与晚期栓塞的疗效对比

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1177/15910199241277583
Matthias Vervoort, Uri Singfer, Lien Van Cauwenberghe, Niels Nordin, Peter Vanlangenhove, Luc Verbeke, Kirsten Colpaert, Edward Baert, Frederic Martens, Luc Defreyne, Elisabeth Dhondt
{"title":"脑动静脉畸形破裂后早期栓塞与晚期栓塞的疗效对比","authors":"Matthias Vervoort, Uri Singfer, Lien Van Cauwenberghe, Niels Nordin, Peter Vanlangenhove, Luc Verbeke, Kirsten Colpaert, Edward Baert, Frederic Martens, Luc Defreyne, Elisabeth Dhondt","doi":"10.1177/15910199241277583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether patients with a ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (rBAVM) would benefit from an early embolization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>rBAVM treated first by embolization between March 2002 and May 2022 were included. Embolization was defined early (Group 1) when performed within 10 days postbleeding. If later, embolization was considered late (Group 2). Demographic and rBAVM data were compared between the groups. High-risk bleeding components and reasons for deferring embolization were retrieved. Primary endpoint was rebleeding. Secondary endpoints were good functional outcome (FO, modified Rankin Scale mRS ≤ 2) and angiographic occlusion. Predictors of rebleeding and FO were determined by multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients were recruited (<i>N</i> = 34 in Group 1; <i>N</i> = 71 in Group 2). No rebleeding was noted before, during or after the first embolization session in the early embolization group. Late embolization depended on missed diagnosis and referral pattern. Eleven patients (10.5%) suffered a rebleeding, of whom <i>N</i> = 3 before embolization (only in Group 2), <i>N</i> = 5 periembolization (<i>N</i> = 2 at the second embolization session in Group 1) and <i>N</i> = 3 spontaneous more than 30 days postembolization. More high-risk components were embolized in Group 1 (19/34; 55.9 vs 17/71; 23.9%; <i>p</i> = .011). Rebleeding rates, FO at last FU (90.9% vs 74.3%) and occlusion rates (80.8% vs 88.5%) did not differ between the groups. Glasgow coma scale ≤ 8 predicted rebleeding, rebleeding correlated with poor FO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early embolization did prevent rebleeding. The overall rebleeding risk was linked to bleeding before late embolization and bleeding at the second embolization. Rebleeding predicted the final FO.</p>","PeriodicalId":14380,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241277583"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569778/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of early versus late primary embolization in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Vervoort, Uri Singfer, Lien Van Cauwenberghe, Niels Nordin, Peter Vanlangenhove, Luc Verbeke, Kirsten Colpaert, Edward Baert, Frederic Martens, Luc Defreyne, Elisabeth Dhondt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241277583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether patients with a ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (rBAVM) would benefit from an early embolization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>rBAVM treated first by embolization between March 2002 and May 2022 were included. Embolization was defined early (Group 1) when performed within 10 days postbleeding. If later, embolization was considered late (Group 2). Demographic and rBAVM data were compared between the groups. High-risk bleeding components and reasons for deferring embolization were retrieved. Primary endpoint was rebleeding. Secondary endpoints were good functional outcome (FO, modified Rankin Scale mRS ≤ 2) and angiographic occlusion. Predictors of rebleeding and FO were determined by multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>105 patients were recruited (<i>N</i> = 34 in Group 1; <i>N</i> = 71 in Group 2). No rebleeding was noted before, during or after the first embolization session in the early embolization group. Late embolization depended on missed diagnosis and referral pattern. Eleven patients (10.5%) suffered a rebleeding, of whom <i>N</i> = 3 before embolization (only in Group 2), <i>N</i> = 5 periembolization (<i>N</i> = 2 at the second embolization session in Group 1) and <i>N</i> = 3 spontaneous more than 30 days postembolization. More high-risk components were embolized in Group 1 (19/34; 55.9 vs 17/71; 23.9%; <i>p</i> = .011). Rebleeding rates, FO at last FU (90.9% vs 74.3%) and occlusion rates (80.8% vs 88.5%) did not differ between the groups. Glasgow coma scale ≤ 8 predicted rebleeding, rebleeding correlated with poor FO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early embolization did prevent rebleeding. The overall rebleeding risk was linked to bleeding before late embolization and bleeding at the second embolization. Rebleeding predicted the final FO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15910199241277583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569778/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241277583\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241277583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定脑动静脉畸形(rBAVM)破裂患者是否能从早期栓塞中获益。方法:纳入2002年3月至2022年5月间首次接受栓塞治疗的rBAVM患者。栓塞治疗在出血后 10 天内进行,则定义为早期栓塞(第 1 组)。如果栓塞时间较晚,则被视为晚期栓塞(第 2 组)。对各组的人口统计学和 rBAVM 数据进行了比较。对高危出血成分和推迟栓塞的原因进行了检索。主要终点是再出血。次要终点是良好功能预后(FO,改良Rankin量表mRS≤2)和血管造影闭塞。通过多变量分析确定再出血和良好功能预后的预测因素:共招募了 105 名患者(第 1 组 34 人;第 2 组 71 人)。早期栓塞组在首次栓塞治疗前、期间或之后均未发现再出血。晚期栓塞取决于漏诊和转诊模式。11名患者(10.5%)再次出血,其中栓塞前3人(仅在第2组),栓塞周围5人(第1组第二次栓塞时2人),栓塞后30天以上自发出血3人。第一组栓塞的高危成分更多(19/34;55.9 vs 17/71;23.9%;P = .011)。两组的再出血率、最后一次 FU 时的 FO(90.9% vs 74.3%)和闭塞率(80.8% vs 88.5%)没有差异。格拉斯哥昏迷量表≤8预示再出血,再出血与FO相关:结论:早期栓塞可预防再出血。总的再出血风险与晚期栓塞前出血和第二次栓塞时出血有关。再出血可预测最终的 FO 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcome of early versus late primary embolization in ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations.

Purpose: To determine whether patients with a ruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (rBAVM) would benefit from an early embolization.

Methods: rBAVM treated first by embolization between March 2002 and May 2022 were included. Embolization was defined early (Group 1) when performed within 10 days postbleeding. If later, embolization was considered late (Group 2). Demographic and rBAVM data were compared between the groups. High-risk bleeding components and reasons for deferring embolization were retrieved. Primary endpoint was rebleeding. Secondary endpoints were good functional outcome (FO, modified Rankin Scale mRS ≤ 2) and angiographic occlusion. Predictors of rebleeding and FO were determined by multivariate analysis.

Results: 105 patients were recruited (N = 34 in Group 1; N = 71 in Group 2). No rebleeding was noted before, during or after the first embolization session in the early embolization group. Late embolization depended on missed diagnosis and referral pattern. Eleven patients (10.5%) suffered a rebleeding, of whom N = 3 before embolization (only in Group 2), N = 5 periembolization (N = 2 at the second embolization session in Group 1) and N = 3 spontaneous more than 30 days postembolization. More high-risk components were embolized in Group 1 (19/34; 55.9 vs 17/71; 23.9%; p = .011). Rebleeding rates, FO at last FU (90.9% vs 74.3%) and occlusion rates (80.8% vs 88.5%) did not differ between the groups. Glasgow coma scale ≤ 8 predicted rebleeding, rebleeding correlated with poor FO.

Conclusion: Early embolization did prevent rebleeding. The overall rebleeding risk was linked to bleeding before late embolization and bleeding at the second embolization. Rebleeding predicted the final FO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Balloon angioplasty for cerebral vasospasm in preschool children. Transradial versus transfemoral access for mechanical thrombectomy: A single institution experience. Validity of Woven EndoBridge sizing based on the device-to-aneurysm volume ratio. Accelerated aspiration with Q™ catheter: An in vitro study. High mechanical thrombectomy procedural volume is not a reliable predictor of improved thrombectomy outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1