用左心房应变预测接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的术后心房颤动

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.047
{"title":"用左心房应变预测接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的术后心房颤动","authors":"","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of left atrial strain (LAS) to predict POAF in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>103 patients undergoing OPCABG.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Results</h3><div>In addition to comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, LAS was measured for reservoir (R), conduction (CD), and contraction (CT) components. POAF was defined as new electrocardiographic evidence of AF requiring treatment. Logistic regression was done to assess factors associated with POAF. The diagnostic accuracy of variables in predicting POAF was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. POAF was documented in 24 (23.3%) patients. There was no difference in ejection fraction, average global longitudinal strain, or proportion of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grades between patients with POAF and patients without POAF. All three components of LAS: LAS R (19.2 ± 4.7 <em>v</em> 23.5 ± 4.8, p &lt; 0.001), LAS CD (8.9 ± 3.7 <em>v</em> 12.3 ± 4.8, p = 0.1), and LAS CT (10.3 ± 3.9 <em>v</em> 12.1 ± 4.1, p = 0.04), were significantly lower among patients with POAF compared with patients without POAF, respectively. According to univariate analysis, all components of LAS were statistically significant predictors of POAF. In multivariate analysis, only age (odds ratio = 1.08, p = 0.025) and LAS R (odds ratio = 0.84, p = 0.004) were independently associated with POAF. LAS R was a better predictor of POAF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758, than LAS CD (AUC = 0.67) and LAS CT (AUC = 0.62). LAS R had an optimal cutoff of 23% with sensitivity of 95.8% (confidence interval: 78.9-99.9%) and specificity of 49.4% (37.9-60.9%) to predict POAF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LAS R is a significant predictor of POAF, and its use can be recommended for screening of OPCABG patients at high risk of POAF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Atrial Strain to Predict Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of left atrial strain (LAS) to predict POAF in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Retrospective observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Tertiary care hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>103 patients undergoing OPCABG.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>None.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements and Results</h3><div>In addition to comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, LAS was measured for reservoir (R), conduction (CD), and contraction (CT) components. POAF was defined as new electrocardiographic evidence of AF requiring treatment. Logistic regression was done to assess factors associated with POAF. The diagnostic accuracy of variables in predicting POAF was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. POAF was documented in 24 (23.3%) patients. There was no difference in ejection fraction, average global longitudinal strain, or proportion of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grades between patients with POAF and patients without POAF. All three components of LAS: LAS R (19.2 ± 4.7 <em>v</em> 23.5 ± 4.8, p &lt; 0.001), LAS CD (8.9 ± 3.7 <em>v</em> 12.3 ± 4.8, p = 0.1), and LAS CT (10.3 ± 3.9 <em>v</em> 12.1 ± 4.1, p = 0.04), were significantly lower among patients with POAF compared with patients without POAF, respectively. According to univariate analysis, all components of LAS were statistically significant predictors of POAF. In multivariate analysis, only age (odds ratio = 1.08, p = 0.025) and LAS R (odds ratio = 0.84, p = 0.004) were independently associated with POAF. LAS R was a better predictor of POAF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758, than LAS CD (AUC = 0.67) and LAS CT (AUC = 0.62). LAS R had an optimal cutoff of 23% with sensitivity of 95.8% (confidence interval: 78.9-99.9%) and specificity of 49.4% (37.9-60.9%) to predict POAF.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LAS R is a significant predictor of POAF, and its use can be recommended for screening of OPCABG patients at high risk of POAF.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024005081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024005081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:术后心房颤动(POAF)与发病率、死亡率和住院时间的增加有关。本研究旨在评估左心房应变(LAS)在预测接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCABG)患者术后心房颤动的实用性:设计:回顾性观察研究:参与者: 103名接受OPCABG手术的患者干预措施:无:测量和结果除了全面的经胸超声心动图外,还测量了 LAS 的储能(R)、传导(CD)和收缩(CT)成分。POAF定义为需要治疗的房颤新心电图证据。采用逻辑回归评估与 POAF 相关的因素。通过接收器操作特征分析评估了预测 POAF 变量的诊断准确性。有 24 例(23.3%)患者被记录为 POAF。在射血分数、平均整体纵向应变或左心室舒张功能障碍等级比例方面,POAF 患者与非 POAF 患者之间没有差异。LAS的所有三个组成部分:LAS R(19.2 ± 4.7 v 23.5 ± 4.8,p < 0.001)、LAS CD(8.9 ± 3.7 v 12.3 ± 4.8,p = 0.1)和LAS CT(10.3 ± 3.9 v 12.1 ± 4.1,p = 0.04)在POAF患者中分别明显低于非POAF患者。根据单变量分析,LAS 的所有组成部分均可在统计学上显著预测 POAF。在多变量分析中,只有年龄(几率比=1.08,P=0.025)和 LAS R(几率比=0.84,P=0.004)与 POAF 独立相关。与 LAS CD(AUC = 0.67)和 LAS CT(AUC = 0.62)相比,LAS R 能更好地预测 POAF,其曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.758。LAS R的最佳临界值为23%,预测POAF的灵敏度为95.8%(置信区间:78.9-99.9%),特异度为49.4%(37.9-60.9%):LAS R 是预测 POAF 的重要指标,建议用于筛查 POAF 高风险的 OPCABG 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left Atrial Strain to Predict Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft

Objective

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay. The objective of this study was to assess the utility of left atrial strain (LAS) to predict POAF in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG).

Design

Retrospective observational study.

Setting

Tertiary care hospital.

Participants

103 patients undergoing OPCABG.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Results

In addition to comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, LAS was measured for reservoir (R), conduction (CD), and contraction (CT) components. POAF was defined as new electrocardiographic evidence of AF requiring treatment. Logistic regression was done to assess factors associated with POAF. The diagnostic accuracy of variables in predicting POAF was assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis. POAF was documented in 24 (23.3%) patients. There was no difference in ejection fraction, average global longitudinal strain, or proportion of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction grades between patients with POAF and patients without POAF. All three components of LAS: LAS R (19.2 ± 4.7 v 23.5 ± 4.8, p < 0.001), LAS CD (8.9 ± 3.7 v 12.3 ± 4.8, p = 0.1), and LAS CT (10.3 ± 3.9 v 12.1 ± 4.1, p = 0.04), were significantly lower among patients with POAF compared with patients without POAF, respectively. According to univariate analysis, all components of LAS were statistically significant predictors of POAF. In multivariate analysis, only age (odds ratio = 1.08, p = 0.025) and LAS R (odds ratio = 0.84, p = 0.004) were independently associated with POAF. LAS R was a better predictor of POAF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.758, than LAS CD (AUC = 0.67) and LAS CT (AUC = 0.62). LAS R had an optimal cutoff of 23% with sensitivity of 95.8% (confidence interval: 78.9-99.9%) and specificity of 49.4% (37.9-60.9%) to predict POAF.

Conclusions

LAS R is a significant predictor of POAF, and its use can be recommended for screening of OPCABG patients at high risk of POAF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Contents Editorial Board 41st Symposium in Barbados brochure Articles to Appear in Future Issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1