使用下游压力成像检查对因胸痛和 HEART 评分较低而到急诊科就诊的患者进行风险分层。

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2024-08-25 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-002735
Rami M Abazid, Nilkanth Pati, Maged Elrayes, Sameh Awadallah, Mohamed M Ibrahim, Amer Alaref, Yves Bureau, Cigdem Akincioglu, Rodrigo Bagur, Nikolaos Tzemos
{"title":"使用下游压力成像检查对因胸痛和 HEART 评分较低而到急诊科就诊的患者进行风险分层。","authors":"Rami M Abazid, Nilkanth Pati, Maged Elrayes, Sameh Awadallah, Mohamed M Ibrahim, Amer Alaref, Yves Bureau, Cigdem Akincioglu, Rodrigo Bagur, Nikolaos Tzemos","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with low HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin level) risk scores who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) may present clinical challenges and diagnostic dilemmas. The use of downstream non-invasive stress imaging (NISI) tests in this population remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the value of NISI in risk stratification and predicting cardiac events in patients with low-risk HEART scores (LRHSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included 1384 patients with LRHSs between March 2019 and March 2021. All the patients underwent NISI (involving myocardial perfusion imaging/stress echocardiography). The primary endpoints included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned coronary revascularisation. Secondary endpoints encompassed cardiovascular-related admissions or ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 64±14 years, with 670 (48.4%) being women. During the 634±104 days of follow-up, 58 (4.2%) patients experienced 62 types of primary endpoints, while 60 (4.3%) developed secondary endpoints. Multivariable Cox models, adjusted for clinical and imaging variables, showed that diabetes (HR: 2.38; p=0.008), HEART score of 3 (HR: 1.32; p=0.01), history of coronary artery disease (HR: 2.75; p=0.003), ECG changes (HR: 5.11; p<0.0001) and abnormal NISI (HR: 16.4; p<0.0001) were primary endpoint predictors, while abnormal NISI was a predictor of secondary endpoints (HR: 3.05; p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NISI significantly predicted primary cardiac events and cardiovascular-related readmissions/ED visits in patients with LRHSs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of downstream stress imaging tests for risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and low HEART score.\",\"authors\":\"Rami M Abazid, Nilkanth Pati, Maged Elrayes, Sameh Awadallah, Mohamed M Ibrahim, Amer Alaref, Yves Bureau, Cigdem Akincioglu, Rodrigo Bagur, Nikolaos Tzemos\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with low HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin level) risk scores who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) may present clinical challenges and diagnostic dilemmas. The use of downstream non-invasive stress imaging (NISI) tests in this population remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the value of NISI in risk stratification and predicting cardiac events in patients with low-risk HEART scores (LRHSs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included 1384 patients with LRHSs between March 2019 and March 2021. All the patients underwent NISI (involving myocardial perfusion imaging/stress echocardiography). The primary endpoints included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned coronary revascularisation. Secondary endpoints encompassed cardiovascular-related admissions or ED visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 64±14 years, with 670 (48.4%) being women. During the 634±104 days of follow-up, 58 (4.2%) patients experienced 62 types of primary endpoints, while 60 (4.3%) developed secondary endpoints. Multivariable Cox models, adjusted for clinical and imaging variables, showed that diabetes (HR: 2.38; p=0.008), HEART score of 3 (HR: 1.32; p=0.01), history of coronary artery disease (HR: 2.75; p=0.003), ECG changes (HR: 5.11; p<0.0001) and abnormal NISI (HR: 16.4; p<0.0001) were primary endpoint predictors, while abnormal NISI was a predictor of secondary endpoints (HR: 3.05; p<0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NISI significantly predicted primary cardiac events and cardiovascular-related readmissions/ED visits in patients with LRHSs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367375/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:从急诊科(ED)出院的 HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素和肌钙蛋白水平)风险评分较低的患者可能会面临临床挑战和诊断难题。下游无创压力成像(NISI)检查在这类人群中的应用仍不确定。因此,本研究旨在探讨 NISI 在低风险 HEART 评分(LRHS)患者的风险分层和心脏事件预测中的价值:我们前瞻性地纳入了2019年3月至2021年3月期间的1384名LRHS患者。所有患者均接受了 NISI(包括心肌灌注成像/应力超声心动图)检查。主要终点包括心源性死亡、非致死性心肌梗死和非计划性冠状动脉血运重建。次要终点包括心血管相关入院或急诊就诊:患者平均年龄为(64±14)岁,其中 670 人(48.4%)为女性。在634±104天的随访期间,58名患者(4.2%)出现了62种主要终点,60名患者(4.3%)出现了次要终点。根据临床和影像学变量调整后的多变量 Cox 模型显示,糖尿病(HR:2.38;p=0.008)、HEART 评分 3(HR:1.32;p=0.01)、冠心病史(HR:2.75;p=0.003)、心电图变化(HR:5.11;p结论:NISI 可显著预测原发性心脏病的发生:NISI可明显预测LRHS患者的原发性心脏事件和心血管相关再入院/急诊就诊率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of downstream stress imaging tests for risk stratification of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and low HEART score.

Background: Patients with low HEART (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin level) risk scores who are discharged from the emergency department (ED) may present clinical challenges and diagnostic dilemmas. The use of downstream non-invasive stress imaging (NISI) tests in this population remains uncertain. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the value of NISI in risk stratification and predicting cardiac events in patients with low-risk HEART scores (LRHSs).

Methods: We prospectively included 1384 patients with LRHSs between March 2019 and March 2021. All the patients underwent NISI (involving myocardial perfusion imaging/stress echocardiography). The primary endpoints included cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and unplanned coronary revascularisation. Secondary endpoints encompassed cardiovascular-related admissions or ED visits.

Results: The mean patient age was 64±14 years, with 670 (48.4%) being women. During the 634±104 days of follow-up, 58 (4.2%) patients experienced 62 types of primary endpoints, while 60 (4.3%) developed secondary endpoints. Multivariable Cox models, adjusted for clinical and imaging variables, showed that diabetes (HR: 2.38; p=0.008), HEART score of 3 (HR: 1.32; p=0.01), history of coronary artery disease (HR: 2.75; p=0.003), ECG changes (HR: 5.11; p<0.0001) and abnormal NISI (HR: 16.4; p<0.0001) were primary endpoint predictors, while abnormal NISI was a predictor of secondary endpoints (HR: 3.05; p<0.0001).

Conclusions: NISI significantly predicted primary cardiac events and cardiovascular-related readmissions/ED visits in patients with LRHSs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy due to truncating variants in myosin binding protein C: a Spanish cohort. Composition of cardiac troponin release differs after marathon running and myocardial infarction. Association of prior tuberculosis with cardiovascular status in perinatally HIV-1-infected adolescents. Myocarditis after COVID-19 and influenza infections: insights from a large data set. Spectrum of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis due to T60A(p.Thr80Ala) variant in an Irish Amyloidosis Network.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1