戈丁闲暇锻炼问卷健康贡献分在多动症成人中使用的可靠性和有效性。

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Perceptual and Motor Skills Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1177/00315125241275199
Mansour M Alotaibi, Robert W Motl, Donald H Lein
{"title":"戈丁闲暇锻炼问卷健康贡献分在多动症成人中使用的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Mansour M Alotaibi, Robert W Motl, Donald H Lein","doi":"10.1177/00315125241275199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may have an unknown influence on the self-reports of physical activity of adults with ADHD and there is a need for high quality self-report assessments of this kind, we examined the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire-Health Contributions Score (GLTEQ-HCS) in its use with 35 adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (26 females, 9 males; <i>M</i>age = 28.7, <i>SD</i> = 6.3 years). Participants completed the GLTEQ twice and wore an ActiGraph GT9X-accelerometer for seven-days. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined test-retest reliability, and we determined construct validity based on correlations between the GLTEQ-HCS and minutes/day of sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), as well as differences in SB, LPA, and MVPA among the three GLTEQ-HCS subgroups. The GLTEQ-HCS had excellent test-retest reliability [ICC = 0.98, 0.95 to 0.99], and it was positively correlated with MVPA (<i>r</i> = 0.47, <i>p</i> = .006; <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 0.52, <i>p</i> = .002). There was a significant and large difference in minutes/day of device-measured MVPA between the three GLTEQ-HCS groups [<i>F</i> (2,32) = 7.30, <i>p</i> = .003, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.33]. These results provide psychometric support for using the GLTEQ-HCS with adults who have been diagnosed with ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and Validity of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire Health Contribution Score in its Use with Adults with ADHD.\",\"authors\":\"Mansour M Alotaibi, Robert W Motl, Donald H Lein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125241275199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may have an unknown influence on the self-reports of physical activity of adults with ADHD and there is a need for high quality self-report assessments of this kind, we examined the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire-Health Contributions Score (GLTEQ-HCS) in its use with 35 adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (26 females, 9 males; <i>M</i>age = 28.7, <i>SD</i> = 6.3 years). Participants completed the GLTEQ twice and wore an ActiGraph GT9X-accelerometer for seven-days. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined test-retest reliability, and we determined construct validity based on correlations between the GLTEQ-HCS and minutes/day of sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), as well as differences in SB, LPA, and MVPA among the three GLTEQ-HCS subgroups. The GLTEQ-HCS had excellent test-retest reliability [ICC = 0.98, 0.95 to 0.99], and it was positively correlated with MVPA (<i>r</i> = 0.47, <i>p</i> = .006; <i>r</i><sub><i>s</i></sub> = 0.52, <i>p</i> = .002). There was a significant and large difference in minutes/day of device-measured MVPA between the three GLTEQ-HCS groups [<i>F</i> (2,32) = 7.30, <i>p</i> = .003, <i>η</i><sup><i>2</i></sup> = 0.33]. These results provide psychometric support for using the GLTEQ-HCS with adults who have been diagnosed with ADHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241275199\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241275199","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)可能对患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人的体育活动自我报告有未知的影响,而且需要高质量的此类自我报告评估,因此我们在 35 名患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人(26 名女性,9 名男性;年龄 = 28.7,SD = 6.3 岁)。参与者完成了两次 GLTEQ 测试,并佩戴 ActiGraph GT9X 加速计七天。我们根据 GLTEQ-HCS 与久坐行为 (SB)、轻体力活动 (LPA) 和中到剧烈体力活动 (MVPA) 分钟/天之间的相关性,以及 GLTEQ-HCS 三个亚组之间在 SB、LPA 和 MVPA 方面的差异,确定了构建有效性。GLTEQ-HCS 的测试-再测可靠性极佳[ICC = 0.98,0.95 至 0.99],并且与 MVPA 呈正相关(r = 0.47,p = .006;rs = 0.52,p = .002)。在三个 GLTEQ-HCS 组别之间,设备测量的 MVPA 分钟/天数存在明显且巨大的差异 [F (2,32) = 7.30, p = .003, η2 = 0.33]。这些结果为将 GLTEQ-HCS 用于被诊断为多动症的成年人提供了心理计量学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability and Validity of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire Health Contribution Score in its Use with Adults with ADHD.

As Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) may have an unknown influence on the self-reports of physical activity of adults with ADHD and there is a need for high quality self-report assessments of this kind, we examined the test-retest reliability and construct validity of the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire-Health Contributions Score (GLTEQ-HCS) in its use with 35 adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (26 females, 9 males; Mage = 28.7, SD = 6.3 years). Participants completed the GLTEQ twice and wore an ActiGraph GT9X-accelerometer for seven-days. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) determined test-retest reliability, and we determined construct validity based on correlations between the GLTEQ-HCS and minutes/day of sedentary behavior (SB), light physical activity (LPA), and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), as well as differences in SB, LPA, and MVPA among the three GLTEQ-HCS subgroups. The GLTEQ-HCS had excellent test-retest reliability [ICC = 0.98, 0.95 to 0.99], and it was positively correlated with MVPA (r = 0.47, p = .006; rs = 0.52, p = .002). There was a significant and large difference in minutes/day of device-measured MVPA between the three GLTEQ-HCS groups [F (2,32) = 7.30, p = .003, η2 = 0.33]. These results provide psychometric support for using the GLTEQ-HCS with adults who have been diagnosed with ADHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
Reliability and Validity of the Trunk Control Measurement Scale in Children With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Immediate Effects of Custom Foot Orthoses on Postural Balance and Pain in Obese Middle-Aged Women With Plantar Fasciitis. Associations Between Fundamental Motor Skill Domains and Physical Fitness Components in 5-11-Year-Old Children. Impact of a Ball Regulation Change on Game Performance and Shooting Play in Japanese U-15 Girls' Handball. The Relationship Between Time Perception and Academic Performance in Primary School Students and the Apparent Mediating Effect of Academic Procrastination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1