内布拉斯加州的管道应急准备:确定机构间准备工作的差距并提出解决方案。

Q3 Medicine Journal of Emergency Management Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.5055/jem.0813
Kylie Johnson, Rachel Lookadoo, Jesse E Bell, Keith Hansen, Meghan Langel, Sharon Medcalf, Laura Nagengast, Eleanor Rogan
{"title":"内布拉斯加州的管道应急准备:确定机构间准备工作的差距并提出解决方案。","authors":"Kylie Johnson, Rachel Lookadoo, Jesse E Bell, Keith Hansen, Meghan Langel, Sharon Medcalf, Laura Nagengast, Eleanor Rogan","doi":"10.5055/jem.0813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Nebraska, there are over 28,000 miles of pipelines that carry various materials, which could impact human health and the natural environment in the event of a leak or spill. Nebraska is heavily reliant on its expansive groundwater supply from the large High Plains aquifer system as well as smaller secondary aquifers. Eighty-eight percent of Nebraska's population utilizes groundwater for personal use, and the state's agricultural sector depends on it for irrigation and livestock care. The ongoing challenges facing the implementation of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline system inspired re-searchers to examine the current state of pipeline emergency preparedness in Nebraska. To do this, a pipeline emergency preparedness workshop was held in November 2021 in Norfolk, Nebraska. Conference participants in-cluded county- and regional-level leadership, local public health departments, tribal representatives, and other organizations. Pipeline emergency responders and other stakeholders were invited to listen to plenary presenta-tions about inland oil spill responses and the current state of Nebraska pipelines and to participate in a facilitated discussion identifying pipeline response challenges and potential solutions. Through a facilitated discussion process, participants identified six general response challenge categories and 24 potential solutions. From those 24 solutions, three were selected as easily implementable solutions-increased joint/coordinated planning, increased pipeline emergency exercising, and increased pipeline emergency train-ing/education. Implementing this work will assist in reducing health risks associated with potential spills.</p>","PeriodicalId":38336,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Management","volume":"22 4","pages":"429-437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pipeline emergency preparedness in Nebraska: Identifying interagency preparedness gaps and proposing solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Johnson, Rachel Lookadoo, Jesse E Bell, Keith Hansen, Meghan Langel, Sharon Medcalf, Laura Nagengast, Eleanor Rogan\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/jem.0813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Nebraska, there are over 28,000 miles of pipelines that carry various materials, which could impact human health and the natural environment in the event of a leak or spill. Nebraska is heavily reliant on its expansive groundwater supply from the large High Plains aquifer system as well as smaller secondary aquifers. Eighty-eight percent of Nebraska's population utilizes groundwater for personal use, and the state's agricultural sector depends on it for irrigation and livestock care. The ongoing challenges facing the implementation of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline system inspired re-searchers to examine the current state of pipeline emergency preparedness in Nebraska. To do this, a pipeline emergency preparedness workshop was held in November 2021 in Norfolk, Nebraska. Conference participants in-cluded county- and regional-level leadership, local public health departments, tribal representatives, and other organizations. Pipeline emergency responders and other stakeholders were invited to listen to plenary presenta-tions about inland oil spill responses and the current state of Nebraska pipelines and to participate in a facilitated discussion identifying pipeline response challenges and potential solutions. Through a facilitated discussion process, participants identified six general response challenge categories and 24 potential solutions. From those 24 solutions, three were selected as easily implementable solutions-increased joint/coordinated planning, increased pipeline emergency exercising, and increased pipeline emergency train-ing/education. Implementing this work will assist in reducing health risks associated with potential spills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Management\",\"volume\":\"22 4\",\"pages\":\"429-437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/jem.0813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内布拉斯加州有超过 28,000 英里的管道输送各种材料,一旦发生泄漏或溢出,可能会影响人类健康和自然环境。内布拉斯加州严重依赖来自大型高原含水层系统和小型次生含水层的丰富地下水供应。内布拉斯加州有 88% 的人口使用地下水作为个人用水,该州的农业部门也依赖地下水进行灌溉和牲畜饲养。拟议中的 Keystone XL 输油管道系统在实施过程中面临的持续挑战激发了再研究人员对内布拉斯加州输油管道应急准备现状的研究。为此,2021 年 11 月在内布拉斯加州诺福克市举办了管道应急准备研讨会。与会者包括县级和地区级领导、当地公共卫生部门、部落代表以及其他组织。管道应急响应人员和其他利益相关者应邀聆听了有关内陆溢油响应和内布拉斯加州管道现状的全体演讲,并参加了确定管道响应挑战和潜在解决方案的协助讨论。通过协助讨论过程,与会者确定了六个一般应对挑战类别和 24 个潜在解决方案。在这 24 个解决方案中,有三个被选为易于实施的解决方案--加强联合/协调规划、加强管道应急演练以及加强管道应急培训/教育。实施这项工作将有助于降低与潜在泄漏相关的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pipeline emergency preparedness in Nebraska: Identifying interagency preparedness gaps and proposing solutions.

In Nebraska, there are over 28,000 miles of pipelines that carry various materials, which could impact human health and the natural environment in the event of a leak or spill. Nebraska is heavily reliant on its expansive groundwater supply from the large High Plains aquifer system as well as smaller secondary aquifers. Eighty-eight percent of Nebraska's population utilizes groundwater for personal use, and the state's agricultural sector depends on it for irrigation and livestock care. The ongoing challenges facing the implementation of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline system inspired re-searchers to examine the current state of pipeline emergency preparedness in Nebraska. To do this, a pipeline emergency preparedness workshop was held in November 2021 in Norfolk, Nebraska. Conference participants in-cluded county- and regional-level leadership, local public health departments, tribal representatives, and other organizations. Pipeline emergency responders and other stakeholders were invited to listen to plenary presenta-tions about inland oil spill responses and the current state of Nebraska pipelines and to participate in a facilitated discussion identifying pipeline response challenges and potential solutions. Through a facilitated discussion process, participants identified six general response challenge categories and 24 potential solutions. From those 24 solutions, three were selected as easily implementable solutions-increased joint/coordinated planning, increased pipeline emergency exercising, and increased pipeline emergency train-ing/education. Implementing this work will assist in reducing health risks associated with potential spills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Management
Journal of Emergency Management Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
United front: Emergency management managers, public health, and infection prevention. What's next for the disaster profession? A study of the opinions of local and state emergency managers and their recommendations for a more resilient future. A case study of university mass casualty simulation with high school deaf students who sign. A qualitative analysis of the effects of the COVID-19 response on low-income residents in Cameron County, Texas: Lessons for future pandemic response. Beirut 2020 explosion and health system response: An alarm for the dangerous consequences of Natech incidents in industrial cities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1