Impella 心脏动力经皮左心室辅助装置动脉切口闭合术后的临床效果。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Invasive Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.25270/jic/24.00168
Kevin J John, Haval Chweich, Carey Kimmelstiel, Charles D Resor, Navin K Kapur
{"title":"Impella 心脏动力经皮左心室辅助装置动脉切口闭合术后的临床效果。","authors":"Kevin J John, Haval Chweich, Carey Kimmelstiel, Charles D Resor, Navin K Kapur","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the increasing utilization of endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella CP (Abiomed), there is a need for standardized guidelines for its safe removal. Development of the Perclose post-closure technique was facilitated by the introduction of a new Impella repositioning sheath in 2019, which enabled re-access to the sidearm and stylet, rewiring of the access artery, and Impella sheath removal. Our retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing Perclose post-closure technique for vascular access closure after Impella removal between 2018 and 2024. Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years, predominantly male (82.6%), were included in the analysis. Indications for Impella placement included complex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.8%) and cardiogenic shock (CS) (heart failure-CS: 32.6%, myocardial infarction-CS: 21.7%). Clinically relevant complications were encountered in less than 5% of cases. No instances of covered stent placement, fasciotomy, amputation, or access site infections were reported. Our study underscores the safety of the Perclose post-closure technique following Impella removal in a diverse cohort of patients, with an overall clinically significant complication rate of less than 5%. The Perclose post-closure technique is a reliable and well-tolerated method for vascular access closure in patients undergoing Impella support.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical outcomes of the post-closure technique for arteriotomy closure with the Impella cardiac power percutaneous left ventricular assist device.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin J John, Haval Chweich, Carey Kimmelstiel, Charles D Resor, Navin K Kapur\",\"doi\":\"10.25270/jic/24.00168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the increasing utilization of endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella CP (Abiomed), there is a need for standardized guidelines for its safe removal. Development of the Perclose post-closure technique was facilitated by the introduction of a new Impella repositioning sheath in 2019, which enabled re-access to the sidearm and stylet, rewiring of the access artery, and Impella sheath removal. Our retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing Perclose post-closure technique for vascular access closure after Impella removal between 2018 and 2024. Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years, predominantly male (82.6%), were included in the analysis. Indications for Impella placement included complex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.8%) and cardiogenic shock (CS) (heart failure-CS: 32.6%, myocardial infarction-CS: 21.7%). Clinically relevant complications were encountered in less than 5% of cases. No instances of covered stent placement, fasciotomy, amputation, or access site infections were reported. Our study underscores the safety of the Perclose post-closure technique following Impella removal in a diverse cohort of patients, with an overall clinically significant complication rate of less than 5%. The Perclose post-closure technique is a reliable and well-tolerated method for vascular access closure in patients undergoing Impella support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Invasive Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Invasive Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着血管内机械循环支持装置(如 Impella CP(Abiomed))的使用率越来越高,有必要制定安全移除该装置的标准化指南。2019年推出的新型Impella复位鞘促进了Perclose术后关闭技术的发展,这种鞘可以重新接入挎管和支架、重新连接入路动脉并移除Impella鞘。我们的回顾性单中心研究纳入了 2018 年至 2024 年期间接受 Perclose 后封闭技术进行 Impella 拔除后血管通路封闭的所有患者。分析共纳入 46 名患者,平均年龄为 63.8 岁,主要为男性(82.6%)。植入 Impella 的适应症包括复杂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(34.8%)和心源性休克(CS)(心衰-CS:32.6%,心肌梗死-CS:21.7%)。出现临床相关并发症的病例不到 5%。无覆盖支架置入、筋膜切开、截肢或入路部位感染的报道。我们的研究强调了 Perclose 后封闭技术在不同患者群中摘除 Impella 后的安全性,总体临床重大并发症发生率低于 5%。Perclose后封闭技术是一种可靠且耐受性良好的方法,适用于接受Impella支持的患者的血管通路封闭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical outcomes of the post-closure technique for arteriotomy closure with the Impella cardiac power percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

With the increasing utilization of endovascular mechanical circulatory support devices, such as the Impella CP (Abiomed), there is a need for standardized guidelines for its safe removal. Development of the Perclose post-closure technique was facilitated by the introduction of a new Impella repositioning sheath in 2019, which enabled re-access to the sidearm and stylet, rewiring of the access artery, and Impella sheath removal. Our retrospective single-center study included all patients undergoing Perclose post-closure technique for vascular access closure after Impella removal between 2018 and 2024. Forty-six patients, with a mean age of 63.8 years, predominantly male (82.6%), were included in the analysis. Indications for Impella placement included complex percutaneous coronary intervention (34.8%) and cardiogenic shock (CS) (heart failure-CS: 32.6%, myocardial infarction-CS: 21.7%). Clinically relevant complications were encountered in less than 5% of cases. No instances of covered stent placement, fasciotomy, amputation, or access site infections were reported. Our study underscores the safety of the Perclose post-closure technique following Impella removal in a diverse cohort of patients, with an overall clinically significant complication rate of less than 5%. The Perclose post-closure technique is a reliable and well-tolerated method for vascular access closure in patients undergoing Impella support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
期刊最新文献
Giant traumatic external iliac artery-femoral arteriovenous fistula. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and cerebral amyloid angiopathy: insights from the LOGIC (Left atrial appendage Occlusion in patients with Gastrointestinal or IntraCranial bleeding) international multicenter registry. A precise endomyocardial biopsy method guided by the electroanatomical mapping system. Cardiac rupture following myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of coronary complications of percutaneous coronary interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1