[首次确定需要长期护理的申请人的特征--对 60 岁及以上参加 AOK 的申请人的护理评估进行的全国性分析]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s00391-024-02344-x
Christine Haeger, Till Baldenius, Susanne Schnitzer, Kathrin Jürchott, Adelheid Kuhlmey, Stefan Blüher, Antje Schwinger
{"title":"[首次确定需要长期护理的申请人的特征--对 60 岁及以上参加 AOK 的申请人的护理评估进行的全国性分析]。","authors":"Christine Haeger, Till Baldenius, Susanne Schnitzer, Kathrin Jürchott, Adelheid Kuhlmey, Stefan Blüher, Antje Schwinger","doi":"10.1007/s00391-024-02344-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing number of care-dependent individuals requires approaches to prevent care dependency or reduce the loss of independence. Long-term care assessments can provide valuable insights into this.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this article is to describe initial applicants with an identified need for long-term care as well as to provide a differentiated analysis of care-related diagnoses by age, gender, care level and federal state.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The nationwide database consists of long-term care assessments conducted by the Medical Service (MD) of individuals insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above who received a care level (PG) for the first time in 2021. Information relevant to long-term care was analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 339,486 individuals with an average age of 79.6 years (±8.4 years) and a female proportion of 59.0% were analyzed. Approximately one half received care level 2 and 32.4% received care level 1. Care levels 3-5 were assessed less frequently (16.2% vs. 4.8% vs. 1.7%, respectively). Individuals living alone were represented more strongly in lower care levels, while individuals not living alone had a higher proportion in care levels 3-5. The most frequent care-relevant diagnoses were senility (R54), polyarthritis (M15) and dementia (F03) with significant differences observed between federal states (ICD-10 R chapter: 0.8% Berlin and Brandenburg vs. 37.9% Saxony; M chapter: 13.6% Bavaria and Hamburg vs. 39.9% Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social determinants, such as age, gender, living alone, and region can play a role in the classification into a care level. Significant differences in care-related diagnoses between federal states warrant further investigation in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Characteristics of applicants with first-time determination of need for long-term care-A nationwide analysis of care assessments of applicants insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above].\",\"authors\":\"Christine Haeger, Till Baldenius, Susanne Schnitzer, Kathrin Jürchott, Adelheid Kuhlmey, Stefan Blüher, Antje Schwinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00391-024-02344-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing number of care-dependent individuals requires approaches to prevent care dependency or reduce the loss of independence. Long-term care assessments can provide valuable insights into this.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this article is to describe initial applicants with an identified need for long-term care as well as to provide a differentiated analysis of care-related diagnoses by age, gender, care level and federal state.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The nationwide database consists of long-term care assessments conducted by the Medical Service (MD) of individuals insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above who received a care level (PG) for the first time in 2021. Information relevant to long-term care was analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study 339,486 individuals with an average age of 79.6 years (±8.4 years) and a female proportion of 59.0% were analyzed. Approximately one half received care level 2 and 32.4% received care level 1. Care levels 3-5 were assessed less frequently (16.2% vs. 4.8% vs. 1.7%, respectively). Individuals living alone were represented more strongly in lower care levels, while individuals not living alone had a higher proportion in care levels 3-5. The most frequent care-relevant diagnoses were senility (R54), polyarthritis (M15) and dementia (F03) with significant differences observed between federal states (ICD-10 R chapter: 0.8% Berlin and Brandenburg vs. 37.9% Saxony; M chapter: 13.6% Bavaria and Hamburg vs. 39.9% Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Social determinants, such as age, gender, living alone, and region can play a role in the classification into a care level. Significant differences in care-related diagnoses between federal states warrant further investigation in future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02344-x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02344-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:依赖护理的人越来越多,这就需要采取一些方法来防止依赖护理或减少独立性的丧失。长期护理评估可以对此提供有价值的见解:本文旨在描述已确定需要长期护理的初始申请人,并按年龄、性别、护理级别和联邦州对与护理相关的诊断进行差异化分析:全国数据库由医疗服务机构(MD)对 2021 年首次接受护理级别(PG)的 60 岁及以上 AOK 受保人进行的长期护理评估组成。对与长期护理相关的信息进行了描述性分析:本研究分析了 339 486 人,他们的平均年龄为 79.6 岁(±8.4 岁),女性比例为 59.0%。大约一半的人接受了 2 级护理,32.4% 的人接受了 1 级护理。接受 3-5 级护理的比例较低(分别为 16.2% 对 4.8% 对 1.7%)。独居者接受较低护理级别的比例较高,而非独居者接受 3-5 级护理的比例较高。最常见的护理相关诊断是衰老症(R54)、多关节炎(M15)和痴呆症(F03),各联邦州之间存在显著差异(ICD-10 R 章:柏林和勃兰登堡为 0.8%,勃兰登堡为 1.7%):0.8%的柏林和勃兰登堡州与 37.9%的萨克森州相比;M 章结论:结论:年龄、性别、独居和地区等社会决定因素会对护理级别的划分产生影响。联邦各州在护理相关诊断方面的显著差异值得在今后的研究中进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Characteristics of applicants with first-time determination of need for long-term care-A nationwide analysis of care assessments of applicants insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above].

Background: The increasing number of care-dependent individuals requires approaches to prevent care dependency or reduce the loss of independence. Long-term care assessments can provide valuable insights into this.

Objective: The aim of this article is to describe initial applicants with an identified need for long-term care as well as to provide a differentiated analysis of care-related diagnoses by age, gender, care level and federal state.

Material and methods: The nationwide database consists of long-term care assessments conducted by the Medical Service (MD) of individuals insured with the AOK aged 60 years and above who received a care level (PG) for the first time in 2021. Information relevant to long-term care was analyzed descriptively.

Results: In this study 339,486 individuals with an average age of 79.6 years (±8.4 years) and a female proportion of 59.0% were analyzed. Approximately one half received care level 2 and 32.4% received care level 1. Care levels 3-5 were assessed less frequently (16.2% vs. 4.8% vs. 1.7%, respectively). Individuals living alone were represented more strongly in lower care levels, while individuals not living alone had a higher proportion in care levels 3-5. The most frequent care-relevant diagnoses were senility (R54), polyarthritis (M15) and dementia (F03) with significant differences observed between federal states (ICD-10 R chapter: 0.8% Berlin and Brandenburg vs. 37.9% Saxony; M chapter: 13.6% Bavaria and Hamburg vs. 39.9% Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania).

Conclusion: Social determinants, such as age, gender, living alone, and region can play a role in the classification into a care level. Significant differences in care-related diagnoses between federal states warrant further investigation in future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
[Risk assessment in geriatric traumatology : Crucial role of anesthesiology]. Distress of surgical nursing personnel in dealing with patients with dementia : An integrative review. [Update atrial fibrillation in older adults]. Mitteilungen der DGG. Mitteilungen der DGGG.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1