心-交感神经收缩力和神经α波段功率:接近-回避冲突期间的跨模态协作。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-23.2024
Neil M Dundon, Alexander Stuber, Tom Bullock, Javier O Garcia, Viktoriya Babenko, Elizabeth Rizor, Dengxian Yang, Barry Giesbrecht, Scott T Grafton
{"title":"心-交感神经收缩力和神经α波段功率:接近-回避冲突期间的跨模态协作。","authors":"Neil M Dundon, Alexander Stuber, Tom Bullock, Javier O Garcia, Viktoriya Babenko, Elizabeth Rizor, Dengxian Yang, Barry Giesbrecht, Scott T Grafton","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As evidence mounts that the cardiac-sympathetic nervous system reacts to challenging cognitive settings, we ask if these responses are epiphenomenal companions or if there is evidence suggesting a more intertwined role of this system with cognitive function. Healthy male and female human participants performed an approach-avoidance paradigm, trading off monetary reward for painful electric shock, while we recorded simultaneous electroencephalographic and cardiac-sympathetic signals. Participants were reward sensitive but also experienced approach-avoidance \"conflict\" when the subjective appeal of the reward was near equivalent to the revulsion of the cost. Drift-diffusion model parameters suggested that participants managed conflict in part by integrating larger volumes of evidence into choices (wider decision boundaries). Late alpha-band (neural) dynamics were consistent with widening decision boundaries serving to combat reward sensitivity and spread attention more fairly to all dimensions of available information. Independently, wider boundaries were also associated with cardiac \"contractility\" (an index of sympathetically mediated positive inotropy). We also saw evidence of conflict-specific \"collaboration\" between the neural and cardiac-sympathetic signals. In states of high conflict, the alignment (i.e., product) of alpha dynamics and contractility were associated with a further widening of the boundary, independent of either signal's singular association. Cross-trial coherence analyses provided additional evidence that the autonomic systems controlling cardiac-sympathetics might influence the assessment of information streams during conflict by disrupting or overriding reward processing. We conclude that cardiac-sympathetic control might play a critical role, in collaboration with cognitive processes, during the approach-avoidance conflict in humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac-Sympathetic Contractility and Neural Alpha-Band Power: Cross-Modal Collaboration during Approach-Avoidance Conflict.\",\"authors\":\"Neil M Dundon, Alexander Stuber, Tom Bullock, Javier O Garcia, Viktoriya Babenko, Elizabeth Rizor, Dengxian Yang, Barry Giesbrecht, Scott T Grafton\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-23.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As evidence mounts that the cardiac-sympathetic nervous system reacts to challenging cognitive settings, we ask if these responses are epiphenomenal companions or if there is evidence suggesting a more intertwined role of this system with cognitive function. Healthy male and female human participants performed an approach-avoidance paradigm, trading off monetary reward for painful electric shock, while we recorded simultaneous electroencephalographic and cardiac-sympathetic signals. Participants were reward sensitive but also experienced approach-avoidance \\\"conflict\\\" when the subjective appeal of the reward was near equivalent to the revulsion of the cost. Drift-diffusion model parameters suggested that participants managed conflict in part by integrating larger volumes of evidence into choices (wider decision boundaries). Late alpha-band (neural) dynamics were consistent with widening decision boundaries serving to combat reward sensitivity and spread attention more fairly to all dimensions of available information. Independently, wider boundaries were also associated with cardiac \\\"contractility\\\" (an index of sympathetically mediated positive inotropy). We also saw evidence of conflict-specific \\\"collaboration\\\" between the neural and cardiac-sympathetic signals. In states of high conflict, the alignment (i.e., product) of alpha dynamics and contractility were associated with a further widening of the boundary, independent of either signal's singular association. Cross-trial coherence analyses provided additional evidence that the autonomic systems controlling cardiac-sympathetics might influence the assessment of information streams during conflict by disrupting or overriding reward processing. We conclude that cardiac-sympathetic control might play a critical role, in collaboration with cognitive processes, during the approach-avoidance conflict in humans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-23.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2008-23.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有越来越多的证据表明,心交感神经系统会对具有挑战性的认知环境做出反应,我们不禁要问,这些反应是否只是表象,或者是否有证据表明该系统与认知功能的作用更为密切相关。健康的男性和女性人类参与者在我们同时记录脑电图(EEG)和心交感神经信号的情况下进行了接近-回避范式,用金钱奖励换取痛苦的电击。参与者对奖赏很敏感,但当奖赏的主观吸引力接近等同于代价的反感时,他们也会经历接近-回避 "冲突"。漂移-扩散模型参数表明,参与者在一定程度上是通过将更多的证据纳入选择(更宽的决策边界)来处理冲突的。晚期阿尔法波段(神经)动态与扩大决策边界的作用一致,即消除对奖励的敏感性,并将注意力更公平地分散到可用信息的所有方面。另外,更宽的边界还与心脏 "收缩力"(交感神经介导的正性肌力指数)有关。我们还看到了神经信号和心脏交感神经信号之间针对冲突的 "协作 "证据。在高度冲突状态下,α动态和收缩力的一致性(即乘积)与边界的进一步扩大有关,与任一信号的单一关联无关。跨试验一致性分析提供了更多证据,证明控制心交感神经的自律神经系统可能会在冲突期间通过干扰或凌驾于奖赏处理之上来影响信息流的评估。我们的结论是,在人类的接近-回避冲突中,心交感神经控制可能会与认知过程合作发挥关键作用。我们对大脑皮层系统如何适应认知挑战已经有了很多了解。与此同时,我们开始了解外周器官(心脏-交感神经)系统中的自律神经介导反应也可能在认知,尤其是复杂决策中发挥适应作用。我们利用决策行为的计算模型、大脑(脑电图)和心交感(收缩力)数据,探究这些信号是否与行为有单独或共同的关联。我们的证据表明,这些系统可能会协同工作,因为人类在做出特别矛盾的决定时会关注所有可用的信息。心交感系统可能是协调反应的一部分,有助于平衡人类过度关注奖励的倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cardiac-Sympathetic Contractility and Neural Alpha-Band Power: Cross-Modal Collaboration during Approach-Avoidance Conflict.

As evidence mounts that the cardiac-sympathetic nervous system reacts to challenging cognitive settings, we ask if these responses are epiphenomenal companions or if there is evidence suggesting a more intertwined role of this system with cognitive function. Healthy male and female human participants performed an approach-avoidance paradigm, trading off monetary reward for painful electric shock, while we recorded simultaneous electroencephalographic and cardiac-sympathetic signals. Participants were reward sensitive but also experienced approach-avoidance "conflict" when the subjective appeal of the reward was near equivalent to the revulsion of the cost. Drift-diffusion model parameters suggested that participants managed conflict in part by integrating larger volumes of evidence into choices (wider decision boundaries). Late alpha-band (neural) dynamics were consistent with widening decision boundaries serving to combat reward sensitivity and spread attention more fairly to all dimensions of available information. Independently, wider boundaries were also associated with cardiac "contractility" (an index of sympathetically mediated positive inotropy). We also saw evidence of conflict-specific "collaboration" between the neural and cardiac-sympathetic signals. In states of high conflict, the alignment (i.e., product) of alpha dynamics and contractility were associated with a further widening of the boundary, independent of either signal's singular association. Cross-trial coherence analyses provided additional evidence that the autonomic systems controlling cardiac-sympathetics might influence the assessment of information streams during conflict by disrupting or overriding reward processing. We conclude that cardiac-sympathetic control might play a critical role, in collaboration with cognitive processes, during the approach-avoidance conflict in humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response. Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Face-Specific Attention during Goal-Directed Visual Search. Monosynaptic Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Glutamate and GABA Co-transmitting Neurons. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field. Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1