多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素在探索-开发权衡中起着不同的中介作用

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024
Cathy S Chen, Dana Mueller, Evan Knep, R Becket Ebitz, Nicola M Grissom
{"title":"多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素在探索-开发权衡中起着不同的中介作用","authors":"Cathy S Chen, Dana Mueller, Evan Knep, R Becket Ebitz, Nicola M Grissom","doi":"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have been repeatedly implicated in neuropsychiatric vulnerability, in part via their roles in mediating the decision-making processes. Although two neuromodulators share a synthesis pathway and are coactivated under states of arousal, they engage in distinct circuits and modulatory roles. However, the specific role of each neuromodulator in decision-making, in particular the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, remains unclear. Revealing how each neuromodulator contributes to exploration-exploitation tradeoff is important in guiding mechanistic hypotheses emerging from computational psychiatric approaches. To understand the differences and overlaps of the roles of these two catecholamine systems in regulating exploration, a direct comparison using the same dynamic decision-making task is needed. Here, we ran male and female mice in a restless two-armed bandit task, which encourages both exploration and exploitation. We systemically administered a nonselective DA antagonist (flupenthixol), a nonselective DA agonist (apomorphine), a NE beta-receptor antagonist (propranolol), and a NE beta-receptor agonist (isoproterenol) and examined changes in exploration within subjects across sessions. We found a bidirectional modulatory effect of dopamine on exploration. Increasing dopamine activity decreased exploration and decreasing dopamine activity increased exploration. The modulatory effect of beta-noradrenergic receptor activity on exploration was mediated by sex. Reinforcement learning model parameters suggested that dopamine modulation affected exploration via decision noise and norepinephrine modulation affected exploration via sensitivity to outcome. Together, these findings suggested that the mechanisms that govern the exploration-exploitation transition are sensitive to changes in both catecholamine functions and revealed differential roles for NE and DA in mediating exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50114,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dopamine and Norepinephrine Differentially Mediate the Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff.\",\"authors\":\"Cathy S Chen, Dana Mueller, Evan Knep, R Becket Ebitz, Nicola M Grissom\",\"doi\":\"10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have been repeatedly implicated in neuropsychiatric vulnerability, in part via their roles in mediating the decision-making processes. Although two neuromodulators share a synthesis pathway and are coactivated under states of arousal, they engage in distinct circuits and modulatory roles. However, the specific role of each neuromodulator in decision-making, in particular the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, remains unclear. Revealing how each neuromodulator contributes to exploration-exploitation tradeoff is important in guiding mechanistic hypotheses emerging from computational psychiatric approaches. To understand the differences and overlaps of the roles of these two catecholamine systems in regulating exploration, a direct comparison using the same dynamic decision-making task is needed. Here, we ran male and female mice in a restless two-armed bandit task, which encourages both exploration and exploitation. We systemically administered a nonselective DA antagonist (flupenthixol), a nonselective DA agonist (apomorphine), a NE beta-receptor antagonist (propranolol), and a NE beta-receptor agonist (isoproterenol) and examined changes in exploration within subjects across sessions. We found a bidirectional modulatory effect of dopamine on exploration. Increasing dopamine activity decreased exploration and decreasing dopamine activity increased exploration. The modulatory effect of beta-noradrenergic receptor activity on exploration was mediated by sex. Reinforcement learning model parameters suggested that dopamine modulation affected exploration via decision noise and norepinephrine modulation affected exploration via sensitivity to outcome. Together, these findings suggested that the mechanisms that govern the exploration-exploitation transition are sensitive to changes in both catecholamine functions and revealed differential roles for NE and DA in mediating exploration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1194-23.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多巴胺(DA)和去甲肾上腺素(NE)多次被认为与神经精神疾病的易感性有关,部分原因是它们在调解决策过程中的作用。尽管这两种神经调节剂共享一条合成途径,并在唤醒状态下共同激活,但它们参与不同的回路并发挥不同的调节作用。然而,每种神经调节剂在决策中的具体作用,尤其是在探索-开发权衡中的作用,仍不清楚。揭示每种神经调节器在探索-利用权衡过程中的作用对于指导计算精神病学方法提出机理假说非常重要。为了了解这两种儿茶酚胺系统在调节探索过程中作用的差异和重叠,需要使用相同的动态决策任务进行直接比较。在这里,我们让雄性和雌性小鼠参加了一项躁动不安的双臂强盗任务,该任务同时鼓励探索和利用。我们给小鼠全身注射了一种非选择性 DA 拮抗剂(氟苯尼考)、一种非选择性 DA 激动剂(阿朴吗啡)、一种 NE β-受体拮抗剂(普萘洛尔)和一种 NE β-受体激动剂(异丙肾上腺素),并考察了受试者在不同阶段的探索变化。我们发现多巴胺对探索有双向调节作用。增加多巴胺活性会减少探索,而减少多巴胺活性则会增加探索。β-去甲肾上腺素能受体活性对探索的调节作用是由性别介导的。强化学习模型参数表明,多巴胺调节通过决策噪音影响探索,去甲肾上腺素调节通过对结果的敏感性影响探索。这些发现共同表明,支配探索-利用转变的机制对两种儿茶酚胺功能的变化都很敏感,并揭示了 NE 和 DA 在介导探索中的不同作用。虽然这两种儿茶酚胺具有共同的生物合成途径和投射靶点,但它们被认为通过不同的神经靶点和受体亚型发挥许多核心功能。然而,尽管有上述证据,计算神经科学文献却经常赋予这两种儿茶酚胺类似的作用。解决这一差异对于指导计算精神病学方法中出现的机理假说非常重要。本研究探讨了多巴胺和去甲肾上腺素在探索-开发权衡中的作用。通过测试小鼠,我们能够比较受试者体内的多种药理作用,并检查个体差异的来源,从而直接比较这两种儿茶酚胺对决策制定的调节作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dopamine and Norepinephrine Differentially Mediate the Exploration-Exploitation Tradeoff.

Dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) have been repeatedly implicated in neuropsychiatric vulnerability, in part via their roles in mediating the decision-making processes. Although two neuromodulators share a synthesis pathway and are coactivated under states of arousal, they engage in distinct circuits and modulatory roles. However, the specific role of each neuromodulator in decision-making, in particular the exploration-exploitation tradeoff, remains unclear. Revealing how each neuromodulator contributes to exploration-exploitation tradeoff is important in guiding mechanistic hypotheses emerging from computational psychiatric approaches. To understand the differences and overlaps of the roles of these two catecholamine systems in regulating exploration, a direct comparison using the same dynamic decision-making task is needed. Here, we ran male and female mice in a restless two-armed bandit task, which encourages both exploration and exploitation. We systemically administered a nonselective DA antagonist (flupenthixol), a nonselective DA agonist (apomorphine), a NE beta-receptor antagonist (propranolol), and a NE beta-receptor agonist (isoproterenol) and examined changes in exploration within subjects across sessions. We found a bidirectional modulatory effect of dopamine on exploration. Increasing dopamine activity decreased exploration and decreasing dopamine activity increased exploration. The modulatory effect of beta-noradrenergic receptor activity on exploration was mediated by sex. Reinforcement learning model parameters suggested that dopamine modulation affected exploration via decision noise and norepinephrine modulation affected exploration via sensitivity to outcome. Together, these findings suggested that the mechanisms that govern the exploration-exploitation transition are sensitive to changes in both catecholamine functions and revealed differential roles for NE and DA in mediating exploration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience
Journal of Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1164
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: JNeurosci (ISSN 0270-6474) is an official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. It is published weekly by the Society, fifty weeks a year, one volume a year. JNeurosci publishes papers on a broad range of topics of general interest to those working on the nervous system. Authors now have an Open Choice option for their published articles
期刊最新文献
A Prefrontal→Periaqueductal Gray Pathway Differentially Engages Autonomic, Hormonal, and Behavioral Features of the Stress-Coping Response. Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms of Face-Specific Attention during Goal-Directed Visual Search. Monosynaptic Inputs to Ventral Tegmental Area Glutamate and GABA Co-transmitting Neurons. Dynamics of Saccade Trajectory Modulation by Distractors: Neural Activity Patterns in the Frontal Eye Field. Monocyte Invasion into the Retina Restricts the Regeneration of Neurons from Müller Glia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1