无图像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中切除前韧带张力评估的可靠性。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Arthroplasty Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1186/s42836-024-00266-y
Dennis K H Yee, Jonathan T C Leung, Vikki Chu, Gene Man, Gloria Y T Lam, Jimmy K Y Lau, Tsz-Lung Choi, Wai-Wang Chau, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Kevin Ki-Wai Ho, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung
{"title":"无图像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中切除前韧带张力评估的可靠性。","authors":"Dennis K H Yee, Jonathan T C Leung, Vikki Chu, Gene Man, Gloria Y T Lam, Jimmy K Y Lau, Tsz-Lung Choi, Wai-Wang Chau, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Kevin Ki-Wai Ho, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00266-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ligament tension balance is a major determinant for the success of total knee replacement (TKR). The present study aimed at determining the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in performing ligament tension assessment using an imageless robotic-assisted TKR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four knees in 21 patients who received robotic-assisted TKR for end-stage varus osteoarthritis were examined. Three orthopedic specialists and six orthopedic trainees participated in the operations. Data from the ligament tension assessment were collected during the operations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the inter-rater reliability, \"extension medial\" and \"flexion medial\" had excellent reliability whilst \"extension lateral\" and \"flexion lateral\" had good-to-excellent reliability. For the intra-rater reliability, \"extension medial\" showed excellent reliability, \"extension lateral\" and \"flexion medial\" showed good-to-excellent reliability, and \"flexion lateral\" showed moderate-to-excellent reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted technology provides a reliable solution to improve ligament tension assessment. All ligament tension assessments with the use of the technology could demonstrate at least good-to-excellent reliability except for the intra-rater reliability of \"flexion lateral\".</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"6 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of pre-resection ligament tension assessment in imageless robotic assisted total knee replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Dennis K H Yee, Jonathan T C Leung, Vikki Chu, Gene Man, Gloria Y T Lam, Jimmy K Y Lau, Tsz-Lung Choi, Wai-Wang Chau, Jonathan Patrick Ng, Michael Tim-Yun Ong, Kevin Ki-Wai Ho, Patrick Shu-Hang Yung\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42836-024-00266-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ligament tension balance is a major determinant for the success of total knee replacement (TKR). The present study aimed at determining the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in performing ligament tension assessment using an imageless robotic-assisted TKR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four knees in 21 patients who received robotic-assisted TKR for end-stage varus osteoarthritis were examined. Three orthopedic specialists and six orthopedic trainees participated in the operations. Data from the ligament tension assessment were collected during the operations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the inter-rater reliability, \\\"extension medial\\\" and \\\"flexion medial\\\" had excellent reliability whilst \\\"extension lateral\\\" and \\\"flexion lateral\\\" had good-to-excellent reliability. For the intra-rater reliability, \\\"extension medial\\\" showed excellent reliability, \\\"extension lateral\\\" and \\\"flexion medial\\\" showed good-to-excellent reliability, and \\\"flexion lateral\\\" showed moderate-to-excellent reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic-assisted technology provides a reliable solution to improve ligament tension assessment. All ligament tension assessments with the use of the technology could demonstrate at least good-to-excellent reliability except for the intra-rater reliability of \\\"flexion lateral\\\".</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"44\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367864/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00266-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00266-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:韧带张力平衡是全膝关节置换术(TKR)成功与否的主要决定因素。本研究旨在确定使用无图像机器人辅助 TKR 进行韧带张力评估的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性:方法:研究人员检查了因终末期曲张性骨关节炎而接受机器人辅助 TKR 的 21 名患者的 24 个膝关节。三名骨科专家和六名骨科实习生参与了手术。在手术过程中收集了韧带张力评估数据:在评分者之间的可靠性方面,"内侧伸展 "和 "内侧屈曲 "的可靠性极佳,而 "外侧伸展 "和 "外侧屈曲 "的可靠性为良好至极佳。在评分者内部可靠性方面,"伸展内侧 "的可靠性极佳,"伸展外侧 "和 "屈曲内侧 "的可靠性为良好至优秀,而 "屈曲外侧 "的可靠性为中等至优秀:结论:机器人辅助技术为改善韧带张力评估提供了可靠的解决方案。结论:机器人辅助技术为改善韧带张力评估提供了可靠的解决方案。除 "屈曲外侧 "的评分者内部可靠性外,使用该技术进行的所有韧带张力评估都至少具有良好至优秀的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of pre-resection ligament tension assessment in imageless robotic assisted total knee replacement.

Background: Ligament tension balance is a major determinant for the success of total knee replacement (TKR). The present study aimed at determining the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability in performing ligament tension assessment using an imageless robotic-assisted TKR.

Methods: Twenty-four knees in 21 patients who received robotic-assisted TKR for end-stage varus osteoarthritis were examined. Three orthopedic specialists and six orthopedic trainees participated in the operations. Data from the ligament tension assessment were collected during the operations.

Results: For the inter-rater reliability, "extension medial" and "flexion medial" had excellent reliability whilst "extension lateral" and "flexion lateral" had good-to-excellent reliability. For the intra-rater reliability, "extension medial" showed excellent reliability, "extension lateral" and "flexion medial" showed good-to-excellent reliability, and "flexion lateral" showed moderate-to-excellent reliability.

Conclusions: Robotic-assisted technology provides a reliable solution to improve ligament tension assessment. All ligament tension assessments with the use of the technology could demonstrate at least good-to-excellent reliability except for the intra-rater reliability of "flexion lateral".

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Conference Proceedings for the 10th Annual Meeting of Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA), 26th Annual Meeting of the Thai Hip and Knee Society (THKS), and the 16th Annual Meeting of the ASEAN Arthroplasty Association (AAA). DAIR for periprosthetic joint infections-One week to save the joint? The distribution of Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) phenotypes in the Malaysian population and their correlation with demographic variables. What is the clinical utility of acoustic and vibrational analyses in uncemented total hip arthroplasty? Nanoparticle ultrasonication: a promising approach for reducing bacterial biofilm in total joint infection-an in vivo rat model investigation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1