针刺后筋膜损伤罕见:对正中神经和尺侧离体神经的研究。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1136/rapm-2024-105803
Victor Varela, Jorge Mejia, Carlos Ruíz, Miguel A Reina, Xavier Sala-Blanch
{"title":"针刺后筋膜损伤罕见:对正中神经和尺侧离体神经的研究。","authors":"Victor Varela, Jorge Mejia, Carlos Ruíz, Miguel A Reina, Xavier Sala-Blanch","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needle trauma has been associated with peripheral nerve injury and neurological dysfunction. However, inadvertent needle puncture is frequent while postblock dysfunction is rare. We conducted a cadaveric study to evaluate the association between needle puncture and fascicular injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five median and five ulnar (isolated) nerves were obtained from fresh human cadavers. Four different needles were used for the transfixing punctures: A 30° beveled (22G) nerve block needle, and 15° beveled (22G, 25G and 27G) Quincke spinal block needles. 10 transfixing punctures were made with each needle type on each nerve (40 punctures per nerve). Samples were then immersed in 5% formaldehyde solution for 30 days. Perpendicular cross-sections of the punctured segments were obtained. Samples were embedded in paraffin and analyzed under light microscopy with H&E staining. On each slice, the following variables were obtained: ratio of fascicular/epineurial tissue, the number of fascicles per nerve and the number of injured fascicles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 punctures were made (200 median and 200 ulnar) and 144 histological nerve sections analyzed (74 median and 70 ulnar). The median number of fascicles per section was 16 (range 7-23) and 17 (range 8-27) with a fascicular/epineural tissue ratio of 45% (range 35%-52%) and 44% (range 39%-54%) for median and ulnar, respectively. Three fascicular injuries were identified: one in ulnar and two in median. All injuries were caused by a 15° beveled needle, the ulnar with a 22G and the median with a 22G and a 27G.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fascicular injury is rare following needle transfixion. Needle injury alone is unlikely to explain postblock neurological dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fascicular injury is rare following needle transfixion: a study on median and ulnar isolated human nerves.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Varela, Jorge Mejia, Carlos Ruíz, Miguel A Reina, Xavier Sala-Blanch\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Needle trauma has been associated with peripheral nerve injury and neurological dysfunction. However, inadvertent needle puncture is frequent while postblock dysfunction is rare. We conducted a cadaveric study to evaluate the association between needle puncture and fascicular injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five median and five ulnar (isolated) nerves were obtained from fresh human cadavers. Four different needles were used for the transfixing punctures: A 30° beveled (22G) nerve block needle, and 15° beveled (22G, 25G and 27G) Quincke spinal block needles. 10 transfixing punctures were made with each needle type on each nerve (40 punctures per nerve). Samples were then immersed in 5% formaldehyde solution for 30 days. Perpendicular cross-sections of the punctured segments were obtained. Samples were embedded in paraffin and analyzed under light microscopy with H&E staining. On each slice, the following variables were obtained: ratio of fascicular/epineurial tissue, the number of fascicles per nerve and the number of injured fascicles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 punctures were made (200 median and 200 ulnar) and 144 histological nerve sections analyzed (74 median and 70 ulnar). The median number of fascicles per section was 16 (range 7-23) and 17 (range 8-27) with a fascicular/epineural tissue ratio of 45% (range 35%-52%) and 44% (range 39%-54%) for median and ulnar, respectively. Three fascicular injuries were identified: one in ulnar and two in median. All injuries were caused by a 15° beveled needle, the ulnar with a 22G and the median with a 22G and a 27G.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fascicular injury is rare following needle transfixion. Needle injury alone is unlikely to explain postblock neurological dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105803\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105803","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针头创伤与周围神经损伤和神经功能障碍有关。然而,针刺不慎的情况经常发生,而阻滞后的功能障碍却很少见。我们进行了一项尸体研究,以评估针刺与筋膜损伤之间的关联:方法:从新鲜的人体尸体上获取五条正中神经和五条尺神经(孤立的)。穿刺时使用了四种不同的针头:30° 斜面(22G)神经阻滞针和 15° 斜面(22G、25G 和 27G)Quincke 脊髓阻滞针。每种针型在每条神经上穿刺 10 次(每条神经穿刺 40 次)。然后将样本浸泡在 5% 的甲醛溶液中 30 天。获取穿刺段的垂直横截面。将样本包埋在石蜡中,用 H&E 染色法在光学显微镜下进行分析。在每张切片上获得以下变量:筋膜/表皮组织的比例、每条神经的筋膜数量以及受伤筋膜的数量:共进行了 400 次穿刺(200 次正中神经穿刺和 200 次尺神经穿刺),分析了 144 个组织学神经切片(74 个正中神经切片和 70 个尺神经切片)。每个切片中筋膜的中位数分别为 16 个(范围为 7-23 个)和 17 个(范围为 8-27 个),正中神经和尺神经的筋膜/神经外膜组织比率分别为 45%(范围为 35%-52%)和 44%(范围为 39%-54%)。共发现三处筋膜损伤:一处在尺骨,两处在正中。所有损伤均由 15° 斜面针造成,尺侧为 22G 针,正中为 22G 和 27G 针:结论:针刺后筋膜损伤很少见。结论:针刺后筋膜损伤很少见,针刺损伤本身不太可能解释阻滞后的神经功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fascicular injury is rare following needle transfixion: a study on median and ulnar isolated human nerves.

Background: Needle trauma has been associated with peripheral nerve injury and neurological dysfunction. However, inadvertent needle puncture is frequent while postblock dysfunction is rare. We conducted a cadaveric study to evaluate the association between needle puncture and fascicular injury.

Methods: Five median and five ulnar (isolated) nerves were obtained from fresh human cadavers. Four different needles were used for the transfixing punctures: A 30° beveled (22G) nerve block needle, and 15° beveled (22G, 25G and 27G) Quincke spinal block needles. 10 transfixing punctures were made with each needle type on each nerve (40 punctures per nerve). Samples were then immersed in 5% formaldehyde solution for 30 days. Perpendicular cross-sections of the punctured segments were obtained. Samples were embedded in paraffin and analyzed under light microscopy with H&E staining. On each slice, the following variables were obtained: ratio of fascicular/epineurial tissue, the number of fascicles per nerve and the number of injured fascicles.

Results: A total of 400 punctures were made (200 median and 200 ulnar) and 144 histological nerve sections analyzed (74 median and 70 ulnar). The median number of fascicles per section was 16 (range 7-23) and 17 (range 8-27) with a fascicular/epineural tissue ratio of 45% (range 35%-52%) and 44% (range 39%-54%) for median and ulnar, respectively. Three fascicular injuries were identified: one in ulnar and two in median. All injuries were caused by a 15° beveled needle, the ulnar with a 22G and the median with a 22G and a 27G.

Conclusions: Fascicular injury is rare following needle transfixion. Needle injury alone is unlikely to explain postblock neurological dysfunction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and risk factors for chronic postamputation pain requiring analgesia or nerve interventions: a population-based study in East Asia. Clinical study of a micro-implantable pulse generator for the treatment of peripheral neuropathic pain: 12-month results from the COMFORT-randomized controlled trial. Axonal sensitivity and block dynamics. Intra-articular corticosteroid injections versus platelet-rich plasma as a treatment for cervical facetogenic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Structural changes in the nociceptive system induced by long-term conventional spinal cord stimulation in experimental painful diabetic polyneuropathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1