英国截肢者流行病学信息自由申请的可行性。

0 REHABILITATION Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2024-08-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351241272390
Stephen G B Kirker
{"title":"英国截肢者流行病学信息自由申请的可行性。","authors":"Stephen G B Kirker","doi":"10.1177/27536351241272390","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While each of the 44 National Health Service commissioned artificial limb clinics in the United Kingdom record information about their own prosthetic limb users, these are not collated to give a national picture of amputee epidemiology. The requirement to respond to Freedom of Information (FoI) requests within 20 working days offers another way of extracting data from all centres, and this study describes a first attempt to use this method to update national epidemiological data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questions were sent to the FoI email addresses of all 44 centres, requesting numbers of adult unilateral below-knee amputees, adult unilateral above or through-knee amputees and child unilateral above or through-knee amputees (all of K2 level mobility), numbers of people consistently using a prosthesis with a single axis myoelectric hand, and access to an occupational therapist with skills to teach someone to use a myoelectric hand. A FoI request was sent to NHS England seeking release of data that they collect every month from all the prosthetic services which they commission in England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All but one of the UK centres responded, the great majority within 31 days. Incomplete results were generally due to centres finding the questions ambiguous and many did not record mobility levels consistently. While 33 centres had access to skilled occupational therapy, only 4 reported more than 10 patients who constantly used a single axis myoelectric hand. Eighteen centres were unable to provide complete data, and the remainder reported a ranges of 5 to 992 below-knee amputees, 7 to 574 adult above-knee amputees and 0 to 137 child above-knee amputees, suggesting different approaches to managing missing mobility level data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Freedom of Information requests are an inexpensive way of gathering data from NHS prosthetic clinics, which can identify age, sex, level of amputation but not activity levels or use of a prosthesis and hence only gives limited demographic information of the amputee cohort.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Freedom of Information Requests for Amputee Epidemiology in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen G B Kirker\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351241272390\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While each of the 44 National Health Service commissioned artificial limb clinics in the United Kingdom record information about their own prosthetic limb users, these are not collated to give a national picture of amputee epidemiology. The requirement to respond to Freedom of Information (FoI) requests within 20 working days offers another way of extracting data from all centres, and this study describes a first attempt to use this method to update national epidemiological data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Questions were sent to the FoI email addresses of all 44 centres, requesting numbers of adult unilateral below-knee amputees, adult unilateral above or through-knee amputees and child unilateral above or through-knee amputees (all of K2 level mobility), numbers of people consistently using a prosthesis with a single axis myoelectric hand, and access to an occupational therapist with skills to teach someone to use a myoelectric hand. A FoI request was sent to NHS England seeking release of data that they collect every month from all the prosthetic services which they commission in England.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All but one of the UK centres responded, the great majority within 31 days. Incomplete results were generally due to centres finding the questions ambiguous and many did not record mobility levels consistently. While 33 centres had access to skilled occupational therapy, only 4 reported more than 10 patients who constantly used a single axis myoelectric hand. Eighteen centres were unable to provide complete data, and the remainder reported a ranges of 5 to 992 below-knee amputees, 7 to 574 adult above-knee amputees and 0 to 137 child above-knee amputees, suggesting different approaches to managing missing mobility level data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Freedom of Information requests are an inexpensive way of gathering data from NHS prosthetic clinics, which can identify age, sex, level of amputation but not activity levels or use of a prosthesis and hence only gives limited demographic information of the amputee cohort.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363036/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241272390\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241272390","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:虽然英国 44 家国家医疗服务机构委托的义肢诊所都记录了各自义肢使用者的信息,但这些信息并没有经过整理,因此无法提供全国截肢者流行病学的情况。要求在 20 个工作日内对信息自由(FoI)请求做出回应的规定为从所有中心提取数据提供了另一种方法,本研究描述了使用这种方法更新全国流行病学数据的首次尝试:我们向所有44个中心的FoI电子邮件地址发送了问题,要求提供成人单侧膝下截肢者、成人单侧膝上或膝下截肢者、儿童单侧膝上或膝下截肢者(均为K2级活动能力)的人数、持续使用单轴肌电手假肢的人数,以及获得具有教人使用肌电手技能的职业治疗师帮助的人数。我们向英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)发出了一份信息公开申请,要求公开他们每月从英国委托的所有假肢服务机构收集的数据:除一家中心外,英国其他所有中心均在 31 天内做出了回复,其中绝大多数中心都在 31 天内做出了回复。不完整的结果通常是由于中心认为问题模棱两可,而且许多中心没有持续记录活动能力水平。虽然有 33 家中心提供了熟练的职业治疗,但只有 4 家中心报告有超过 10 名患者持续使用单轴肌电手。18家中心无法提供完整的数据,其余中心报告的膝下截肢者人数在5至992人之间,成人膝上截肢者人数在7至574人之间,儿童膝上截肢者人数在0至137人之间,这表明这些中心采用了不同的方法来管理缺失的活动度数据:信息自由申请是一种从国家医疗服务系统假肢诊所收集数据的廉价方法,它可以确定年龄、性别、截肢程度,但不能确定活动程度或假肢使用情况,因此只能提供截肢者群体的有限人口统计学信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Feasibility of Freedom of Information Requests for Amputee Epidemiology in the United Kingdom.

Introduction: While each of the 44 National Health Service commissioned artificial limb clinics in the United Kingdom record information about their own prosthetic limb users, these are not collated to give a national picture of amputee epidemiology. The requirement to respond to Freedom of Information (FoI) requests within 20 working days offers another way of extracting data from all centres, and this study describes a first attempt to use this method to update national epidemiological data.

Methods: Questions were sent to the FoI email addresses of all 44 centres, requesting numbers of adult unilateral below-knee amputees, adult unilateral above or through-knee amputees and child unilateral above or through-knee amputees (all of K2 level mobility), numbers of people consistently using a prosthesis with a single axis myoelectric hand, and access to an occupational therapist with skills to teach someone to use a myoelectric hand. A FoI request was sent to NHS England seeking release of data that they collect every month from all the prosthetic services which they commission in England.

Results: All but one of the UK centres responded, the great majority within 31 days. Incomplete results were generally due to centres finding the questions ambiguous and many did not record mobility levels consistently. While 33 centres had access to skilled occupational therapy, only 4 reported more than 10 patients who constantly used a single axis myoelectric hand. Eighteen centres were unable to provide complete data, and the remainder reported a ranges of 5 to 992 below-knee amputees, 7 to 574 adult above-knee amputees and 0 to 137 child above-knee amputees, suggesting different approaches to managing missing mobility level data.

Conclusions: Freedom of Information requests are an inexpensive way of gathering data from NHS prosthetic clinics, which can identify age, sex, level of amputation but not activity levels or use of a prosthesis and hence only gives limited demographic information of the amputee cohort.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of the Lived Experience of Individuals After Undergoing Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputation. Feasibility of Freedom of Information Requests for Amputee Epidemiology in the United Kingdom. Floor-hugging Intervention: A Perspective on Floor Exposure and After-Fall Contingency Intervention. Clinical Determinants of Knee Joint Loads While Sidestepping: An Exploratory Study With Male Rugby Union Athletes. Primary Motor Area Activity in Phantom Limb Imagery of Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees With Phantom Limb Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1