对经股截肢者接受骨结合手术后的生活体验进行定性分析。

0 REHABILITATION Advances in rehabilitation science and practice Pub Date : 2024-08-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536351241271538
Michael Furtado, Joseph Carneglia, Rebecca Fletcher, Lindsay Spitaletto, Summer Swift
{"title":"对经股截肢者接受骨结合手术后的生活体验进行定性分析。","authors":"Michael Furtado, Joseph Carneglia, Rebecca Fletcher, Lindsay Spitaletto, Summer Swift","doi":"10.1177/27536351241271538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess the first-hand lived experiences of patients with amputation who had transitioned from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI) to impact their overall quality of life (QOL) and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative phenomenological study. Participants who had a unilateral transfemoral amputation and fit the study's inclusion criteria were interviewed in a semi-structured format regarding their quality of life and function before and after transitioning from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI). Responses were then analyzed through line-by-line coding to determine themes that were relevant to QOL outcomes for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants were interviewed in this study. The qualitative analysis demonstrated an emergence of 6 main themes consisting of \"Improved Quality of Life,\" \"Supportive Community,\" \"Previous Ill-fitting Socket,\" \"Greater Function,\" \"Improved Osseo-perception,\" and \"Promotion of Community Accessibility\". Strengths included the use of an OI-specific quality of life assessment with adapted questions from validated outcome measures, international participants, and use of thematic analysis for data analysis. Weaknesses included sample size, niche participant population, and OI as a revision procedure only. More research is still necessary to explore/determine the benefits and detriments of Osseointegration as an alternative to traditional sockets for prosthetic devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals who have undergone Osseointegration procedure discuss being more satisfied with their prosthesis and quality of life when compared to their previous experience of a traditional socket.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>This is a first of its kind study reporting on the lived experiences of those who have undergone OI. The field of amputation rehabilitation is expanding rapidly and knowing how this procedure impacts quality of life is important for healthcare professionals to understand as new frontiers are explored in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366099/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualitative Analysis of the Lived Experience of Individuals After Undergoing Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Furtado, Joseph Carneglia, Rebecca Fletcher, Lindsay Spitaletto, Summer Swift\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/27536351241271538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess the first-hand lived experiences of patients with amputation who had transitioned from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI) to impact their overall quality of life (QOL) and function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative phenomenological study. Participants who had a unilateral transfemoral amputation and fit the study's inclusion criteria were interviewed in a semi-structured format regarding their quality of life and function before and after transitioning from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI). Responses were then analyzed through line-by-line coding to determine themes that were relevant to QOL outcomes for this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants were interviewed in this study. The qualitative analysis demonstrated an emergence of 6 main themes consisting of \\\"Improved Quality of Life,\\\" \\\"Supportive Community,\\\" \\\"Previous Ill-fitting Socket,\\\" \\\"Greater Function,\\\" \\\"Improved Osseo-perception,\\\" and \\\"Promotion of Community Accessibility\\\". Strengths included the use of an OI-specific quality of life assessment with adapted questions from validated outcome measures, international participants, and use of thematic analysis for data analysis. Weaknesses included sample size, niche participant population, and OI as a revision procedure only. More research is still necessary to explore/determine the benefits and detriments of Osseointegration as an alternative to traditional sockets for prosthetic devices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individuals who have undergone Osseointegration procedure discuss being more satisfied with their prosthesis and quality of life when compared to their previous experience of a traditional socket.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>This is a first of its kind study reporting on the lived experiences of those who have undergone OI. The field of amputation rehabilitation is expanding rapidly and knowing how this procedure impacts quality of life is important for healthcare professionals to understand as new frontiers are explored in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366099/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241271538\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351241271538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究的目的是定性评估从传统插座(TS)过渡到骨结合(OI)的截肢患者的第一手生活经验对其整体生活质量(QOL)和功能的影响:这是一项定性现象学研究。我们以半结构化的形式采访了单侧经股截肢且符合研究纳入标准的参与者,了解他们从传统插座(TS)过渡到骨结合(OI)前后的生活质量和功能。然后通过逐行编码对回答进行分析,以确定与本研究的 QOL 结果相关的主题:本研究共采访了 11 位参与者。定性分析显示出现了 6 个主题,包括 "提高生活质量"、"支持性社区"、"以前不合适的插座"、"更强的功能"、"改善 Osseo 感知 "和 "促进社区无障碍"。该研究的优点包括:使用了专门针对骨关节炎的生活质量评估方法,并从已验证的结果测量中改编了问题;有国际参与者;使用主题分析法进行数据分析。不足之处包括样本大小、参与人群小众化,以及只将 OI 作为一种修正程序。仍有必要进行更多的研究,以探索/确定骨结合作为传统义齿套筒替代品的利弊:结论:接受过骨结合手术的患者认为,与之前使用传统义齿套筒的经历相比,他们对义齿和生活质量更加满意:这项研究首次报告了接受骨整合术者的生活体验。截肢康复领域正在迅速扩展,随着这一领域新领域的探索,了解这种手术对生活质量的影响对医护人员来说非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualitative Analysis of the Lived Experience of Individuals After Undergoing Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputation.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to qualitatively assess the first-hand lived experiences of patients with amputation who had transitioned from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI) to impact their overall quality of life (QOL) and function.

Methods: This was a qualitative phenomenological study. Participants who had a unilateral transfemoral amputation and fit the study's inclusion criteria were interviewed in a semi-structured format regarding their quality of life and function before and after transitioning from a traditional socket (TS) to Osseointegration (OI). Responses were then analyzed through line-by-line coding to determine themes that were relevant to QOL outcomes for this study.

Results: Eleven participants were interviewed in this study. The qualitative analysis demonstrated an emergence of 6 main themes consisting of "Improved Quality of Life," "Supportive Community," "Previous Ill-fitting Socket," "Greater Function," "Improved Osseo-perception," and "Promotion of Community Accessibility". Strengths included the use of an OI-specific quality of life assessment with adapted questions from validated outcome measures, international participants, and use of thematic analysis for data analysis. Weaknesses included sample size, niche participant population, and OI as a revision procedure only. More research is still necessary to explore/determine the benefits and detriments of Osseointegration as an alternative to traditional sockets for prosthetic devices.

Conclusion: Individuals who have undergone Osseointegration procedure discuss being more satisfied with their prosthesis and quality of life when compared to their previous experience of a traditional socket.

Impact statement: This is a first of its kind study reporting on the lived experiences of those who have undergone OI. The field of amputation rehabilitation is expanding rapidly and knowing how this procedure impacts quality of life is important for healthcare professionals to understand as new frontiers are explored in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of the Lived Experience of Individuals After Undergoing Osseointegration for Transfemoral Amputation. Feasibility of Freedom of Information Requests for Amputee Epidemiology in the United Kingdom. Floor-hugging Intervention: A Perspective on Floor Exposure and After-Fall Contingency Intervention. Clinical Determinants of Knee Joint Loads While Sidestepping: An Exploratory Study With Male Rugby Union Athletes. Primary Motor Area Activity in Phantom Limb Imagery of Traumatic Unilateral Lower Limb Amputees With Phantom Limb Pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1