使用组合分割方法检测 X 光片上的椎体

Brian C Chang, Jonathan Renslo, Qifei Dong, Sandra K Johnston, Jessica Perry, David R Haynor, Gang Luo, Nancy E Lane, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Nathan M Cross
{"title":"使用组合分割方法检测 X 光片上的椎体","authors":"Brian C Chang, Jonathan Renslo, Qifei Dong, Sandra K Johnston, Jessica Perry, David R Haynor, Gang Luo, Nancy E Lane, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Nathan M Cross","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Vertebral compression fractures may indicate osteoporosis but are underdiagnosed and underreported by radiologists. We have developed an ensemble of vertebral body (VB) segmentation models for lateral radiographs as a critical component of an automated, opportunistic screening tool. Our goal is to detect the approximate location of thoracic and lumbar VBs, including fractured vertebra, on lateral radiographs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) data set includes spine radiographs of 5994 men aged ≥65 years from 6 clinical centers. Two segmentation models, U-Net and Mask-RCNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network), were independently trained on the MrOS data set retrospectively, and an ensemble was created by combining them. Primary performance metrics for VB detection success included precision, recall, and F1 score for object detection on a held-out test set. Intersection over union (IoU) and Dice coefficient were also calculated as secondary metrics of performance for the test set. A separate external data set from a quaternary health care enterprise was acquired to test generalizability, comprising diagnostic clinical radiographs from men and women aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 83.42%, Mask-RCNN = 86.30%, and ensemble = 88.34% in detecting all VBs, and F1 score of U-Net = 87.88%, Mask-RCNN = 92.31%, and ensemble = 97.14% in detecting severely fractured vertebrae. The trained models achieved an average IoU per VB of 0.759 for U-Net and 0.709 for Mask-RCNN. The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 81.11%, Mask-RCNN = 79.24%, and ensemble = 87.72% in detecting all VBs in the external data set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ensemble model combining predictions from U-Net and Mask-RCNN resulted in the best performance in detecting VBs on lateral radiographs and generalized well to an external data set. This model could be a key component of a pipeline to detect fractures on all vertebrae in a radiograph in an automated, opportunistic screening tool under development.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using an Ensemble of Segmentation Methods to Detect Vertebral Bodies on Radiographs.\",\"authors\":\"Brian C Chang, Jonathan Renslo, Qifei Dong, Sandra K Johnston, Jessica Perry, David R Haynor, Gang Luo, Nancy E Lane, Jeffrey G Jarvik, Nathan M Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.3174/ajnr.A8343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Vertebral compression fractures may indicate osteoporosis but are underdiagnosed and underreported by radiologists. We have developed an ensemble of vertebral body (VB) segmentation models for lateral radiographs as a critical component of an automated, opportunistic screening tool. Our goal is to detect the approximate location of thoracic and lumbar VBs, including fractured vertebra, on lateral radiographs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) data set includes spine radiographs of 5994 men aged ≥65 years from 6 clinical centers. Two segmentation models, U-Net and Mask-RCNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network), were independently trained on the MrOS data set retrospectively, and an ensemble was created by combining them. Primary performance metrics for VB detection success included precision, recall, and F1 score for object detection on a held-out test set. Intersection over union (IoU) and Dice coefficient were also calculated as secondary metrics of performance for the test set. A separate external data set from a quaternary health care enterprise was acquired to test generalizability, comprising diagnostic clinical radiographs from men and women aged ≥65 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 83.42%, Mask-RCNN = 86.30%, and ensemble = 88.34% in detecting all VBs, and F1 score of U-Net = 87.88%, Mask-RCNN = 92.31%, and ensemble = 97.14% in detecting severely fractured vertebrae. The trained models achieved an average IoU per VB of 0.759 for U-Net and 0.709 for Mask-RCNN. The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 81.11%, Mask-RCNN = 79.24%, and ensemble = 87.72% in detecting all VBs in the external data set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An ensemble model combining predictions from U-Net and Mask-RCNN resulted in the best performance in detecting VBs on lateral radiographs and generalized well to an external data set. This model could be a key component of a pipeline to detect fractures on all vertebrae in a radiograph in an automated, opportunistic screening tool under development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:椎体压缩性骨折可能预示着骨质疏松症,但放射科医生对其诊断和报告不足。我们为侧位片开发了一组椎体(VB)分割模型,作为自动机会性筛查工具的重要组成部分。我们的目标是在侧位X光片上检测胸椎和腰椎椎体(包括骨折椎体)的大致位置:男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)数据集包括来自 6 个临床中心的 5994 名年龄≥65 岁男性的脊柱X光片。两个分割模型--U-Net 和 Mask-RCNN(基于区域的卷积神经网络)--分别在 MrOS 数据集上进行了回顾性训练,并通过组合创建了一个集合。VB 检测成功与否的主要性能指标包括精确度、召回率和在保留测试集上进行物体检测的 F1 分数。此外,还计算了交集大于联合(IoU)和骰子系数,作为测试集的次要性能指标。为了测试通用性,还从一家四级医疗保健企业获取了一个单独的外部数据集,其中包括年龄≥65 岁的男性和女性的临床放射诊断照片:在检测所有 VB 方面,训练模型的 F1 得分分别为 U-Net = 83.42%、Mask-RCNN = 86.30%、ensemble = 88.34%;在检测严重椎体骨折方面,训练模型的 F1 得分分别为 U-Net = 87.88%、Mask-RCNN = 92.31%、ensemble = 97.14%。U-Net 和 Mask-RCNN 的训练模型在检测严重椎体骨折方面的平均 IoU 分别为 0.759 和 0.709。在检测外部数据集中的所有 VB 时,训练模型的 F1 分数分别为 U-Net = 81.11%、Mask-RCNN = 79.24%、ensemble = 87.72%:结合 U-Net 和 Mask-RCNN 预测的集合模型在检测侧位X光片上的 VB 方面表现最佳,并能很好地推广到外部数据集。该模型可以成为正在开发的自动机会性筛查工具中检测X光片上所有椎体骨折的管道的关键组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using an Ensemble of Segmentation Methods to Detect Vertebral Bodies on Radiographs.

Background and purpose: Vertebral compression fractures may indicate osteoporosis but are underdiagnosed and underreported by radiologists. We have developed an ensemble of vertebral body (VB) segmentation models for lateral radiographs as a critical component of an automated, opportunistic screening tool. Our goal is to detect the approximate location of thoracic and lumbar VBs, including fractured vertebra, on lateral radiographs.

Materials and methods: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study (MrOS) data set includes spine radiographs of 5994 men aged ≥65 years from 6 clinical centers. Two segmentation models, U-Net and Mask-RCNN (Region-based Convolutional Neural Network), were independently trained on the MrOS data set retrospectively, and an ensemble was created by combining them. Primary performance metrics for VB detection success included precision, recall, and F1 score for object detection on a held-out test set. Intersection over union (IoU) and Dice coefficient were also calculated as secondary metrics of performance for the test set. A separate external data set from a quaternary health care enterprise was acquired to test generalizability, comprising diagnostic clinical radiographs from men and women aged ≥65 years.

Results: The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 83.42%, Mask-RCNN = 86.30%, and ensemble = 88.34% in detecting all VBs, and F1 score of U-Net = 87.88%, Mask-RCNN = 92.31%, and ensemble = 97.14% in detecting severely fractured vertebrae. The trained models achieved an average IoU per VB of 0.759 for U-Net and 0.709 for Mask-RCNN. The trained models achieved F1 score of U-Net = 81.11%, Mask-RCNN = 79.24%, and ensemble = 87.72% in detecting all VBs in the external data set.

Conclusions: An ensemble model combining predictions from U-Net and Mask-RCNN resulted in the best performance in detecting VBs on lateral radiographs and generalized well to an external data set. This model could be a key component of a pipeline to detect fractures on all vertebrae in a radiograph in an automated, opportunistic screening tool under development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantification of Infarct Core Volume in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Using Cerebral Metabolic Rate of Oxygen in CT Perfusion. Cerebrovascular Anomalies in the Fetus. Imaging Findings in Giant Cell Arteritis: Don't Turn a Blind Eye to the Obvious! An Extended Follow-up of Spinal Instrumentation Rescue with Cement Augmentation. Prevalence of Rathke Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1 MPRAGE at 7T MRI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1