医疗不信任和虐待经历与曾考虑自行管理人工流产的关系。

Aliza Adler, M Antonia Biggs, Shelly Kaller, Rosalyn Schroeder, Ndola Prata, Karen Scott, Lauren Ralph
{"title":"医疗不信任和虐待经历与曾考虑自行管理人工流产的关系。","authors":"Aliza Adler, M Antonia Biggs, Shelly Kaller, Rosalyn Schroeder, Ndola Prata, Karen Scott, Lauren Ralph","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of ever considering self-managing an abortion (SMA) and its associations with experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment in a nationally representative sample.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2021-22, we conducted a national, cross-sectional, online probability-based survey of US people assigned female at birth ages 15-49. Among those who had ever been pregnant, we ran weighted multivariable logistic regressions to examine whether having had difficulty trusting medical providers and/or experiencing medical mistreatment was associated with SMA consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4260 participants who had ever been pregnant, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.3%-6.3%) ever considered SMA. Additionally, 38.8% (95% CI, 36.8%-40.9%) reported prior moderate medical mistrust; 17.0% (15.4%-18.6%) experienced neglect of symptoms only, and 22.2% (20.6%-24.0%) experienced ridicule or humiliation in a previous healthcare encounter. In multivariable analyses, those who reported prior high medical mistrust had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=5.2, [95% CI, 2.9-9.2]), compared to those who had no prior medical mistrust. Those who had experienced ridicule or humiliation by healthcare providers had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=3.8, [95% CI, 2.3-6.1]), compared to those without such experiences. Participants who believed others perceived them as Black or Arab/Middle Eastern, were poor in their youth, or identified as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and other had higher proportions of considering SMA (p-values<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment are common and are associated with increased likelihood of considering SMA. Those who identified with a structurally minoritized group were more likely to consider SMA, and those whose \"street race\" was Arab/Middle Eastern had the highest likelihood.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>If restrictions on abortion continue to increase, individuals may further consider SMA. Our findings suggest a need to create healthcare environments that foster trust and respect, as well as to ensure people have access to safe options for SMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association of experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment and ever considering self-managing an abortion.\",\"authors\":\"Aliza Adler, M Antonia Biggs, Shelly Kaller, Rosalyn Schroeder, Ndola Prata, Karen Scott, Lauren Ralph\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the prevalence of ever considering self-managing an abortion (SMA) and its associations with experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment in a nationally representative sample.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>In 2021-22, we conducted a national, cross-sectional, online probability-based survey of US people assigned female at birth ages 15-49. Among those who had ever been pregnant, we ran weighted multivariable logistic regressions to examine whether having had difficulty trusting medical providers and/or experiencing medical mistreatment was associated with SMA consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4260 participants who had ever been pregnant, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.3%-6.3%) ever considered SMA. Additionally, 38.8% (95% CI, 36.8%-40.9%) reported prior moderate medical mistrust; 17.0% (15.4%-18.6%) experienced neglect of symptoms only, and 22.2% (20.6%-24.0%) experienced ridicule or humiliation in a previous healthcare encounter. In multivariable analyses, those who reported prior high medical mistrust had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=5.2, [95% CI, 2.9-9.2]), compared to those who had no prior medical mistrust. Those who had experienced ridicule or humiliation by healthcare providers had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=3.8, [95% CI, 2.3-6.1]), compared to those without such experiences. Participants who believed others perceived them as Black or Arab/Middle Eastern, were poor in their youth, or identified as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and other had higher proportions of considering SMA (p-values<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment are common and are associated with increased likelihood of considering SMA. Those who identified with a structurally minoritized group were more likely to consider SMA, and those whose \\\"street race\\\" was Arab/Middle Eastern had the highest likelihood.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>If restrictions on abortion continue to increase, individuals may further consider SMA. Our findings suggest a need to create healthcare environments that foster trust and respect, as well as to ensure people have access to safe options for SMA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在全国具有代表性的样本中,评估曾经考虑自我管理人工流产(SMA)的发生率及其与医疗不信任和虐待经历的关联:在一个具有全国代表性的样本中,评估曾经考虑自我管理人工流产(SMA)的流行率及其与医疗不信任和虐待经历的关联:研究设计:2021-22 年,我们对 15-49 岁出生时即被指定为女性的美国人进行了一次全国性、横断面、在线概率调查。在曾经怀孕的人群中,我们进行了加权多变量逻辑回归,以研究难以信任医疗服务提供者和/或遭受医疗虐待是否与考虑 SMA 有关:在 4260 名曾经怀孕的参与者中,5.2%(95% CI,4.3%-6.3%)曾经考虑过 SMA。此外,38.8%(95% CI,36.8%-40.9%)的受试者表示曾有过中度的医疗不信任;17.0%(15.4%-18.6%)的受试者仅有过忽视症状的经历,22.2%(20.6%-24.0%)的受试者在之前的医疗经历中受到过嘲笑或羞辱。在多变量分析中,与之前没有医疗不信任经历的人相比,之前报告过高度医疗不信任经历的人考虑 SMA 的几率更高(aOR=5.2,[95% CI,2.9-9.2])。经历过医疗服务提供者嘲笑或羞辱的参与者与无此类经历者相比,考虑 SMA 的几率增加(aOR=3.8,[95% CI,2.3-6.1])。认为他人认为自己是黑人或阿拉伯/中东人、年轻时贫穷或被认定为 LGBTQ+ 的参与者考虑 SMA 的比例更高(p 值 < 0.01):医疗不信任和虐待的经历很常见,与考虑接受 SMA 的可能性增加有关。那些被认定为结构上属于少数群体的人更有可能考虑 SMA,而那些 "街头种族 "为阿拉伯/中东人的人考虑 SMA 的可能性最大:如果对堕胎的限制继续增加,人们可能会进一步考虑 SMA。我们的研究结果表明,有必要营造一种促进信任和尊重的医疗环境,并确保人们能够获得安全的 SMA 选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The association of experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment and ever considering self-managing an abortion.

Objective: To assess the prevalence of ever considering self-managing an abortion (SMA) and its associations with experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment in a nationally representative sample.

Study design: In 2021-22, we conducted a national, cross-sectional, online probability-based survey of US people assigned female at birth ages 15-49. Among those who had ever been pregnant, we ran weighted multivariable logistic regressions to examine whether having had difficulty trusting medical providers and/or experiencing medical mistreatment was associated with SMA consideration.

Results: Of 4260 participants who had ever been pregnant, 5.2% (95% CI, 4.3%-6.3%) ever considered SMA. Additionally, 38.8% (95% CI, 36.8%-40.9%) reported prior moderate medical mistrust; 17.0% (15.4%-18.6%) experienced neglect of symptoms only, and 22.2% (20.6%-24.0%) experienced ridicule or humiliation in a previous healthcare encounter. In multivariable analyses, those who reported prior high medical mistrust had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=5.2, [95% CI, 2.9-9.2]), compared to those who had no prior medical mistrust. Those who had experienced ridicule or humiliation by healthcare providers had increased odds of considering SMA (aOR=3.8, [95% CI, 2.3-6.1]), compared to those without such experiences. Participants who believed others perceived them as Black or Arab/Middle Eastern, were poor in their youth, or identified as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and other had higher proportions of considering SMA (p-values<0.01).

Conclusions: Experiences of medical mistrust and mistreatment are common and are associated with increased likelihood of considering SMA. Those who identified with a structurally minoritized group were more likely to consider SMA, and those whose "street race" was Arab/Middle Eastern had the highest likelihood.

Implications: If restrictions on abortion continue to increase, individuals may further consider SMA. Our findings suggest a need to create healthcare environments that foster trust and respect, as well as to ensure people have access to safe options for SMA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1