Pauline Ali MD, MSc, Pauline Renaud MD, Manuel Montero-Odasso MD, FRCPC, PhD, AGSF, FGSA, Jennifer Gautier MS, Mickaël Dinomais MD, PhD, Cédric Annweiler MD, PhD
{"title":"不同认知能力的老年人的步态表现:GAIT队列的结果。","authors":"Pauline Ali MD, MSc, Pauline Renaud MD, Manuel Montero-Odasso MD, FRCPC, PhD, AGSF, FGSA, Jennifer Gautier MS, Mickaël Dinomais MD, PhD, Cédric Annweiler MD, PhD","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Gait performance can provide valuable insights into cognitive functioning in older adult and may be used to screen for cognitive impairment. However, the optimal test condition and spatiotemporal parameter for accuracy have not yet been determined. This study aims to determine the gait measure with the highest accuracy identifying cognitive decline.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 711 participants were recruited, including 332 cognitively healthy individuals, 264 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 115 with dementia, with a mean age of 72 years (interquartile range 69–76), and 43% (<i>n</i> = 307) of women. The participants underwent gait assessment in three different conditions, including a single task and dual tasks of counting backward by ones and naming animals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Gait performance was deteriorated as cognitive impairment progressed. The gait test performed during naming animals condition was the most accurate in differentiating between cognitive groups. Specifically, the naming animals gait speed was more accurate in discriminating control participants from those with cognitive impairment (area under the curve [AUC] = 76.9% for MCI and 99.7% for people with dementia with control group as reference). The coefficient of stride length variability while naming animals was the most effective parameter in discriminating between MCI and dementia groups (AUC = 96.7%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The naming animals dual-task gait test can be a valuable assessment for screening cognitive impairment in older adults, regardless of their cognitive abilities. The test is useful in clinical settings for subjects with a range of cognitive profiles.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"72 11","pages":"3437-3447"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gait performance in older adults across the cognitive spectrum: Results from the GAIT cohort\",\"authors\":\"Pauline Ali MD, MSc, Pauline Renaud MD, Manuel Montero-Odasso MD, FRCPC, PhD, AGSF, FGSA, Jennifer Gautier MS, Mickaël Dinomais MD, PhD, Cédric Annweiler MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Gait performance can provide valuable insights into cognitive functioning in older adult and may be used to screen for cognitive impairment. However, the optimal test condition and spatiotemporal parameter for accuracy have not yet been determined. This study aims to determine the gait measure with the highest accuracy identifying cognitive decline.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 711 participants were recruited, including 332 cognitively healthy individuals, 264 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 115 with dementia, with a mean age of 72 years (interquartile range 69–76), and 43% (<i>n</i> = 307) of women. The participants underwent gait assessment in three different conditions, including a single task and dual tasks of counting backward by ones and naming animals.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Gait performance was deteriorated as cognitive impairment progressed. The gait test performed during naming animals condition was the most accurate in differentiating between cognitive groups. Specifically, the naming animals gait speed was more accurate in discriminating control participants from those with cognitive impairment (area under the curve [AUC] = 76.9% for MCI and 99.7% for people with dementia with control group as reference). The coefficient of stride length variability while naming animals was the most effective parameter in discriminating between MCI and dementia groups (AUC = 96.7%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The naming animals dual-task gait test can be a valuable assessment for screening cognitive impairment in older adults, regardless of their cognitive abilities. The test is useful in clinical settings for subjects with a range of cognitive profiles.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"72 11\",\"pages\":\"3437-3447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.19162\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gait performance in older adults across the cognitive spectrum: Results from the GAIT cohort
Background
Gait performance can provide valuable insights into cognitive functioning in older adult and may be used to screen for cognitive impairment. However, the optimal test condition and spatiotemporal parameter for accuracy have not yet been determined. This study aims to determine the gait measure with the highest accuracy identifying cognitive decline.
Methods
A total of 711 participants were recruited, including 332 cognitively healthy individuals, 264 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 115 with dementia, with a mean age of 72 years (interquartile range 69–76), and 43% (n = 307) of women. The participants underwent gait assessment in three different conditions, including a single task and dual tasks of counting backward by ones and naming animals.
Results
Gait performance was deteriorated as cognitive impairment progressed. The gait test performed during naming animals condition was the most accurate in differentiating between cognitive groups. Specifically, the naming animals gait speed was more accurate in discriminating control participants from those with cognitive impairment (area under the curve [AUC] = 76.9% for MCI and 99.7% for people with dementia with control group as reference). The coefficient of stride length variability while naming animals was the most effective parameter in discriminating between MCI and dementia groups (AUC = 96.7%).
Conclusions
The naming animals dual-task gait test can be a valuable assessment for screening cognitive impairment in older adults, regardless of their cognitive abilities. The test is useful in clinical settings for subjects with a range of cognitive profiles.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.