恐惧发作对丛集性头痛患者疼痛相关残疾的影响:恐惧回避模型的启示

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Headache Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/head.14823
Janosch Fox, Charly Gaul, Mirjana Slijepcevic, Julia Ohse, Nicolina Peperkorn, Youssef Shiban
{"title":"恐惧发作对丛集性头痛患者疼痛相关残疾的影响:恐惧回避模型的启示","authors":"Janosch Fox, Charly Gaul, Mirjana Slijepcevic, Julia Ohse, Nicolina Peperkorn, Youssef Shiban","doi":"10.1111/head.14823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study utilized the theoretical framework of the \"fear avoidance model\" (FAM) and investigated the role of fear of attack in pain-related disability. To this end, a measurement specific to cluster headache (CH) was used to investigate whether fear of attacks, alongside attack frequency, is a significant predictor of pain-related disability in CH.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cluster headache substantially impacts daily functioning, yet empirical research exploring specific contributing factors is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken in patients with CH, gathering sociodemographic, clinical data, and responses on the Cluster Headache Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of data from 640 patients (chronic CH: 287/640 [44.8%]; female: 264/640 [41.3%]; male: 373/640 [58.3%]; gender diverse: three of 640 [0.5%]; age range: 18-86 years; mean [standard deviation] Cluster Headache Scales subscale disability score: 36.9 [9.8]; out of 869 respondents) revealed that both attack frequency and fear of attacks significantly predicted pain-related disability (p < 0.001, percentage of variance explained: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.24). More variance was explained by fear of attacks (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.22) than by attack frequency (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02). This relationship remained significant even when controlling for depression and anxiety, which were also identified as independent predictors of pain-related disability (p < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the relevance of psychological factors in CH-related disability. Fear of attacks was found to be an independent predictor, while attack frequency was of minor relevance. Empirical investigation of the FAM in CH could improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying disability and contribute to the development of CH-specific interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of fear of attacks on pain-related disability in cluster headache: Insights from the fear avoidance model.\",\"authors\":\"Janosch Fox, Charly Gaul, Mirjana Slijepcevic, Julia Ohse, Nicolina Peperkorn, Youssef Shiban\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study utilized the theoretical framework of the \\\"fear avoidance model\\\" (FAM) and investigated the role of fear of attack in pain-related disability. To this end, a measurement specific to cluster headache (CH) was used to investigate whether fear of attacks, alongside attack frequency, is a significant predictor of pain-related disability in CH.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Cluster headache substantially impacts daily functioning, yet empirical research exploring specific contributing factors is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken in patients with CH, gathering sociodemographic, clinical data, and responses on the Cluster Headache Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of data from 640 patients (chronic CH: 287/640 [44.8%]; female: 264/640 [41.3%]; male: 373/640 [58.3%]; gender diverse: three of 640 [0.5%]; age range: 18-86 years; mean [standard deviation] Cluster Headache Scales subscale disability score: 36.9 [9.8]; out of 869 respondents) revealed that both attack frequency and fear of attacks significantly predicted pain-related disability (p < 0.001, percentage of variance explained: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.24). More variance was explained by fear of attacks (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.22) than by attack frequency (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.02). This relationship remained significant even when controlling for depression and anxiety, which were also identified as independent predictors of pain-related disability (p < 0.001, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study emphasizes the relevance of psychological factors in CH-related disability. Fear of attacks was found to be an independent predictor, while attack frequency was of minor relevance. Empirical investigation of the FAM in CH could improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying disability and contribute to the development of CH-specific interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14823\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14823","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究利用 "恐惧回避模型"(FAM)的理论框架,调查了恐惧发作在疼痛相关残疾中的作用。为此,研究人员使用了集束性头痛(CH)特有的测量方法,以调查对发作的恐惧以及发作频率是否是集束性头痛患者疼痛相关残疾的重要预测因素:背景:丛集性头痛严重影响了患者的日常功能,但探索具体诱因的实证研究却十分有限:方法:对丛集性头痛患者进行横断面在线调查,收集社会人口学、临床数据以及对丛集性头痛量表和抑郁、焦虑与压力量表的回答:对 640 名患者的数据进行了分析(慢性头痛患者:287/640 [44.8%];女性:264/640 [41.3%];男性:373/640 [58.3%];性别差异:640 人中有 3 人 [0.5%];年龄范围:18-86 岁;平均 [标准]:1.5%;性别差异:640 人中有 3 人 [0.5%]:在 869 名受访者中,平均[标准差]丛集性头痛量表分量表残疾评分:36.9 [9.8])显示,发作频率和对发作的恐惧可显著预测与疼痛相关的残疾(p 2 = 0.24)。对发作的恐惧(R2 = 0.22)比发作频率(R2 = 0.02)能解释更多的变异。即使在控制抑郁和焦虑的情况下,这种关系仍然很重要,因为抑郁和焦虑也是疼痛相关残疾的独立预测因素(p 2 = 0.44):本研究强调了心理因素与 CH 相关残疾的相关性。结论:本研究强调了心理因素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病相关残疾的相关性。研究发现,对疾病发作的恐惧是一个独立的预测因素,而疾病发作频率则与此关系不大。对慢性阻塞性肺病患者的心理障碍进行实证调查,可加深对残疾发生机制的理解,并有助于开发针对慢性阻塞性肺病的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of fear of attacks on pain-related disability in cluster headache: Insights from the fear avoidance model.

Objective: This study utilized the theoretical framework of the "fear avoidance model" (FAM) and investigated the role of fear of attack in pain-related disability. To this end, a measurement specific to cluster headache (CH) was used to investigate whether fear of attacks, alongside attack frequency, is a significant predictor of pain-related disability in CH.

Background: Cluster headache substantially impacts daily functioning, yet empirical research exploring specific contributing factors is limited.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was undertaken in patients with CH, gathering sociodemographic, clinical data, and responses on the Cluster Headache Scale and the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale.

Results: Analysis of data from 640 patients (chronic CH: 287/640 [44.8%]; female: 264/640 [41.3%]; male: 373/640 [58.3%]; gender diverse: three of 640 [0.5%]; age range: 18-86 years; mean [standard deviation] Cluster Headache Scales subscale disability score: 36.9 [9.8]; out of 869 respondents) revealed that both attack frequency and fear of attacks significantly predicted pain-related disability (p < 0.001, percentage of variance explained: R2 = 0.24). More variance was explained by fear of attacks (R2 = 0.22) than by attack frequency (R2 = 0.02). This relationship remained significant even when controlling for depression and anxiety, which were also identified as independent predictors of pain-related disability (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.44).

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the relevance of psychological factors in CH-related disability. Fear of attacks was found to be an independent predictor, while attack frequency was of minor relevance. Empirical investigation of the FAM in CH could improve the understanding of the mechanisms underlying disability and contribute to the development of CH-specific interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
期刊最新文献
Safety and tolerability of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine in participants taking atogepant for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine: Results from the TANDEM study. Anxiety, depression, and headache-related disability in a large pediatric clinic-based sample. Associations of comorbid headache disorders and depression with leisure-time physical activity among 14,088 adults in The Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. Magnetoencephalography studies in migraine and headache disorders: A systematic review. Comparative bioavailability of single-dose zavegepant during and between migraine attacks: A phase 1, randomized, open-label, fixed-sequence, two-period study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1