预测脑小血管疾病中的痴呆症:机器学习与传统统计模型的比较

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100235
Rui Li , Eric Harshfield , Steven Bell , Michael Burkhart , Anil Tuladhar , Saima Hilal , Daniel Tozer , Francesca Chappell , Stephen Makin , Jessica Lo , Joanna Wardlaw , Frank-Erik de Leeuw , Christopher Chen , Zoe Kourtzi , Hugh Markus
{"title":"预测脑小血管疾病中的痴呆症:机器学习与传统统计模型的比较","authors":"Rui Li ,&nbsp;Eric Harshfield ,&nbsp;Steven Bell ,&nbsp;Michael Burkhart ,&nbsp;Anil Tuladhar ,&nbsp;Saima Hilal ,&nbsp;Daniel Tozer ,&nbsp;Francesca Chappell ,&nbsp;Stephen Makin ,&nbsp;Jessica Lo ,&nbsp;Joanna Wardlaw ,&nbsp;Frank-Erik de Leeuw ,&nbsp;Christopher Chen ,&nbsp;Zoe Kourtzi ,&nbsp;Hugh Markus","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) contributes to 45% of dementia cases worldwide. Only a minority of SVD patients develop dementia, yet we lack a reliable model for predicting incident dementia in SVD. Most attempts to date have relied on traditional statistical approaches, whereas machine learning (ML) methods are increasingly used for clinical prediction in other settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We investigated whether ML methods improved prediction of incident dementia in SVD over traditional statistical. We included three cohorts with varying SVD severity (RUN DMC, n=503; SCANS, n=121; HARMONISATION, n=265). Baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, cognitive scores, and MRI features of SVD were used for prediction. We conducted both survival analysis and classification analysis predicting 3-year dementia risk. For each analysis, several ML methods were evaluated against standard Cox or logistic regression. Finally, we compared the feature importance ranking by different models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 789 participants without missing data in the survival analysis, among whom 108 (13.7%) developed dementia during a median (IQR) follow-up period of 5.4 (4.1, 8.7) years. After excluding those censored before three years, we included 750 participants in the classification analysis, among whom 48 (6.4%) developed dementia by year 3. Comparing statistical and ML models, only the regularised Cox/logistic regression models outperformed their statistical counterparts overall, but not significantly so in survival analysis. Baseline cognitive scores were highly predictive, and all methods ranked global cognition as the most important feature.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>ML survival or classification models brought little improvement over traditional statistical approaches in predicting incident dementia in SVD. ML approaches may be better suited to prediction problems using a larger number of input variables.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100235"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000369/pdfft?md5=1a8a1ebdfff1743e3d65cbda2e2d4fe6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666245024000369-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Incident Dementia in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Comparison of Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Models\",\"authors\":\"Rui Li ,&nbsp;Eric Harshfield ,&nbsp;Steven Bell ,&nbsp;Michael Burkhart ,&nbsp;Anil Tuladhar ,&nbsp;Saima Hilal ,&nbsp;Daniel Tozer ,&nbsp;Francesca Chappell ,&nbsp;Stephen Makin ,&nbsp;Jessica Lo ,&nbsp;Joanna Wardlaw ,&nbsp;Frank-Erik de Leeuw ,&nbsp;Christopher Chen ,&nbsp;Zoe Kourtzi ,&nbsp;Hugh Markus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) contributes to 45% of dementia cases worldwide. Only a minority of SVD patients develop dementia, yet we lack a reliable model for predicting incident dementia in SVD. Most attempts to date have relied on traditional statistical approaches, whereas machine learning (ML) methods are increasingly used for clinical prediction in other settings.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We investigated whether ML methods improved prediction of incident dementia in SVD over traditional statistical. We included three cohorts with varying SVD severity (RUN DMC, n=503; SCANS, n=121; HARMONISATION, n=265). Baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, cognitive scores, and MRI features of SVD were used for prediction. We conducted both survival analysis and classification analysis predicting 3-year dementia risk. For each analysis, several ML methods were evaluated against standard Cox or logistic regression. Finally, we compared the feature importance ranking by different models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 789 participants without missing data in the survival analysis, among whom 108 (13.7%) developed dementia during a median (IQR) follow-up period of 5.4 (4.1, 8.7) years. After excluding those censored before three years, we included 750 participants in the classification analysis, among whom 48 (6.4%) developed dementia by year 3. Comparing statistical and ML models, only the regularised Cox/logistic regression models outperformed their statistical counterparts overall, but not significantly so in survival analysis. Baseline cognitive scores were highly predictive, and all methods ranked global cognition as the most important feature.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>ML survival or classification models brought little improvement over traditional statistical approaches in predicting incident dementia in SVD. ML approaches may be better suited to prediction problems using a larger number of input variables.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000369/pdfft?md5=1a8a1ebdfff1743e3d65cbda2e2d4fe6&pid=1-s2.0-S2666245024000369-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000369\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666245024000369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言全世界45%的痴呆症病例是由脑小血管疾病(SVD)引起的。只有少数 SVD 患者会发展成痴呆症,但我们缺乏预测 SVD 患者痴呆症的可靠模型。迄今为止,大多数尝试都依赖于传统的统计学方法,而机器学习(ML)方法正越来越多地用于其他情况下的临床预测。我们纳入了三个SVD严重程度不同的队列(RUN DMC,n=503;SCANS,n=121;HARMONISATION,n=265)。基线人口统计学、血管风险因素、认知评分和 SVD 的 MRI 特征均用于预测。我们进行了预测 3 年痴呆风险的生存分析和分类分析。在每项分析中,我们都对几种 ML 方法与标准 Cox 或逻辑回归进行了评估。最后,我们比较了不同模型的特征重要性排序。结果我们在生存分析中纳入了 789 名无数据缺失的参与者,其中 108 人(13.7%)在中位数(IQR)为 5.4(4.1,8.7)年的随访期间患上了痴呆症。在剔除三年前的剔除者后,我们将 750 名参与者纳入了分类分析,其中 48 人(6.4%)在第三年患上了痴呆症。比较统计模型和 ML 模型,只有正则化 Cox/logistic 回归模型的总体表现优于统计模型,但在生存分析中表现并不明显。基线认知评分具有很高的预测性,所有方法都将整体认知列为最重要的特征。ML方法可能更适用于使用较多输入变量的预测问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting Incident Dementia in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease: Comparison of Machine Learning and Traditional Statistical Models

Introduction

Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) contributes to 45% of dementia cases worldwide. Only a minority of SVD patients develop dementia, yet we lack a reliable model for predicting incident dementia in SVD. Most attempts to date have relied on traditional statistical approaches, whereas machine learning (ML) methods are increasingly used for clinical prediction in other settings.

Methods

We investigated whether ML methods improved prediction of incident dementia in SVD over traditional statistical. We included three cohorts with varying SVD severity (RUN DMC, n=503; SCANS, n=121; HARMONISATION, n=265). Baseline demographics, vascular risk factors, cognitive scores, and MRI features of SVD were used for prediction. We conducted both survival analysis and classification analysis predicting 3-year dementia risk. For each analysis, several ML methods were evaluated against standard Cox or logistic regression. Finally, we compared the feature importance ranking by different models.

Results

We included 789 participants without missing data in the survival analysis, among whom 108 (13.7%) developed dementia during a median (IQR) follow-up period of 5.4 (4.1, 8.7) years. After excluding those censored before three years, we included 750 participants in the classification analysis, among whom 48 (6.4%) developed dementia by year 3. Comparing statistical and ML models, only the regularised Cox/logistic regression models outperformed their statistical counterparts overall, but not significantly so in survival analysis. Baseline cognitive scores were highly predictive, and all methods ranked global cognition as the most important feature.

Discussion

ML survival or classification models brought little improvement over traditional statistical approaches in predicting incident dementia in SVD. ML approaches may be better suited to prediction problems using a larger number of input variables.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Brain health assessment. An exploratory review of tools related to its cognitive dimension What is brain health? In search of a marker of altered cerebrovascular function in hypertension: Analysis of the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations in UK Biobank resting state fMRI data Lifetime influences on imaging markers of adverse brain health and vascular disease What have clinical trials taught us about brain health?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1