Mina Sadat Mahmoudi , Seyed Abolfazl Motahari , Babak Khalaj
{"title":"关于从交叉样本中学习稀疏线性模型","authors":"Mina Sadat Mahmoudi , Seyed Abolfazl Motahari , Babak Khalaj","doi":"10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The sample complexity of a sparse linear model where samples are dependent is studied in this paper. We consider a specific dependency structure of the samples which arises in some experimental designs such as drug sensitivity studies, where two sets of objects (drugs and cells) are sampled independently, and after crossing (making all possible combinations of drugs and cells), the resulting output (efficacy of drugs) is measured. We call these types of samples as “cross samples”. The dependency among such samples is strong, and existing theoretical studies are either inapplicable or fail to provide realistic bounds. We aim at analyzing the performance of the Lasso estimator where the underlying distributions are mixtures of Gaussians and the data dependency arises from the crossing procedure. Our theoretical results show that the performance of the Lasso estimator in case of cross samples follows that of the i.i.d. samples with differences in constant factors. Through numerical results, we observe a phase transition: When datasets are too small, the error for cross samples is much larger than for i.i.d. samples, but once the size is large enough, cross samples are nearly as useful as i.i.d. samples. Our theoretical analysis suggests that the transition threshold is governed by the level of sparsity of the true parameter vector being estimated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49523,"journal":{"name":"Signal Processing","volume":"227 ","pages":"Article 109680"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On learning sparse linear models from cross samples\",\"authors\":\"Mina Sadat Mahmoudi , Seyed Abolfazl Motahari , Babak Khalaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sigpro.2024.109680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The sample complexity of a sparse linear model where samples are dependent is studied in this paper. We consider a specific dependency structure of the samples which arises in some experimental designs such as drug sensitivity studies, where two sets of objects (drugs and cells) are sampled independently, and after crossing (making all possible combinations of drugs and cells), the resulting output (efficacy of drugs) is measured. We call these types of samples as “cross samples”. The dependency among such samples is strong, and existing theoretical studies are either inapplicable or fail to provide realistic bounds. We aim at analyzing the performance of the Lasso estimator where the underlying distributions are mixtures of Gaussians and the data dependency arises from the crossing procedure. Our theoretical results show that the performance of the Lasso estimator in case of cross samples follows that of the i.i.d. samples with differences in constant factors. Through numerical results, we observe a phase transition: When datasets are too small, the error for cross samples is much larger than for i.i.d. samples, but once the size is large enough, cross samples are nearly as useful as i.i.d. samples. Our theoretical analysis suggests that the transition threshold is governed by the level of sparsity of the true parameter vector being estimated.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Signal Processing\",\"volume\":\"227 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109680\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165168424003001\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165168424003001","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
On learning sparse linear models from cross samples
The sample complexity of a sparse linear model where samples are dependent is studied in this paper. We consider a specific dependency structure of the samples which arises in some experimental designs such as drug sensitivity studies, where two sets of objects (drugs and cells) are sampled independently, and after crossing (making all possible combinations of drugs and cells), the resulting output (efficacy of drugs) is measured. We call these types of samples as “cross samples”. The dependency among such samples is strong, and existing theoretical studies are either inapplicable or fail to provide realistic bounds. We aim at analyzing the performance of the Lasso estimator where the underlying distributions are mixtures of Gaussians and the data dependency arises from the crossing procedure. Our theoretical results show that the performance of the Lasso estimator in case of cross samples follows that of the i.i.d. samples with differences in constant factors. Through numerical results, we observe a phase transition: When datasets are too small, the error for cross samples is much larger than for i.i.d. samples, but once the size is large enough, cross samples are nearly as useful as i.i.d. samples. Our theoretical analysis suggests that the transition threshold is governed by the level of sparsity of the true parameter vector being estimated.
期刊介绍:
Signal Processing incorporates all aspects of the theory and practice of signal processing. It features original research work, tutorial and review articles, and accounts of practical developments. It is intended for a rapid dissemination of knowledge and experience to engineers and scientists working in the research, development or practical application of signal processing.
Subject areas covered by the journal include: Signal Theory; Stochastic Processes; Detection and Estimation; Spectral Analysis; Filtering; Signal Processing Systems; Software Developments; Image Processing; Pattern Recognition; Optical Signal Processing; Digital Signal Processing; Multi-dimensional Signal Processing; Communication Signal Processing; Biomedical Signal Processing; Geophysical and Astrophysical Signal Processing; Earth Resources Signal Processing; Acoustic and Vibration Signal Processing; Data Processing; Remote Sensing; Signal Processing Technology; Radar Signal Processing; Sonar Signal Processing; Industrial Applications; New Applications.