COP28 关于动员私人投资化石燃料开采业以应对气候变化的目标

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105285
{"title":"COP28 关于动员私人投资化石燃料开采业以应对气候变化的目标","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes data from the Sovereign ESG Data Portal to assess how macroeconomic factors influence ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments in the fossil fuels extraction sector across G7 countries from 2005 to 2022. Using the PMG-ARDL technique, findings reveal that a 1% rise in income inequality leads to a 0.14% decrease in ESG investment in the short term and 0.43% in the long term. Conversely, a 1% increase in household spending on education results in a 0.12% short-term and 0.16% long-term boost in ESG investment. Economic growth does not significantly affect ESG investment, likely due to the sector's profit-driven nature. Additionally, a 1% increase in industry value decreases ESG investment, while better governance practices enhance it. The study suggests that policies focusing on improving governance, reducing inequality, and increasing education spending are crucial for promoting sustainable investments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COP28 targets for mobilizing private investment in fossil fuels extraction industry to cope with the climate change\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyzes data from the Sovereign ESG Data Portal to assess how macroeconomic factors influence ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments in the fossil fuels extraction sector across G7 countries from 2005 to 2022. Using the PMG-ARDL technique, findings reveal that a 1% rise in income inequality leads to a 0.14% decrease in ESG investment in the short term and 0.43% in the long term. Conversely, a 1% increase in household spending on education results in a 0.12% short-term and 0.16% long-term boost in ESG investment. Economic growth does not significantly affect ESG investment, likely due to the sector's profit-driven nature. Additionally, a 1% increase in industry value decreases ESG investment, while better governance practices enhance it. The study suggests that policies focusing on improving governance, reducing inequality, and increasing education spending are crucial for promoting sustainable investments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006524\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420724006524","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究分析了主权ESG数据门户网站的数据,以评估宏观经济因素如何影响2005年至2022年七国集团(G7)化石燃料开采行业的ESG(环境、社会和治理)投资。利用 PMG-ARDL 技术,研究结果表明,收入不平等每增加 1%,ESG 投资在短期内就会减少 0.14%,在长期内减少 0.43%。相反,家庭教育支出每增加 1%,ESG 投资短期增长 0.12%,长期增长 0.16%。经济增长对环境、社会和治理投资的影响不大,这可能是由于该行业的利润驱动性质。此外,行业价值每增加 1%,ESG 投资就会减少,而更好的治理实践则会增加 ESG 投资。研究表明,以改善治理、减少不平等和增加教育支出为重点的政策对于促进可持续投资至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COP28 targets for mobilizing private investment in fossil fuels extraction industry to cope with the climate change

This study analyzes data from the Sovereign ESG Data Portal to assess how macroeconomic factors influence ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investments in the fossil fuels extraction sector across G7 countries from 2005 to 2022. Using the PMG-ARDL technique, findings reveal that a 1% rise in income inequality leads to a 0.14% decrease in ESG investment in the short term and 0.43% in the long term. Conversely, a 1% increase in household spending on education results in a 0.12% short-term and 0.16% long-term boost in ESG investment. Economic growth does not significantly affect ESG investment, likely due to the sector's profit-driven nature. Additionally, a 1% increase in industry value decreases ESG investment, while better governance practices enhance it. The study suggests that policies focusing on improving governance, reducing inequality, and increasing education spending are crucial for promoting sustainable investments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Uncertainty and entrepreneurship in oil-rich developing countries: Does institution matter? Impact of natural resource rents on global trade dynamics in RCEP: Economic and geopolitical interdependencies Asymmetric relationship between crude oil price and remittance inflows in a small island economy: Evidence from non-linear ARDL approach Institutions as a determinant of FDI and the role of natural resources
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1