Xushi ZHANG , Wanjia ZHENG , Sijuan HUANG , Haojiang LI , Zhisheng BI , Xin YANG
{"title":"利用剂量组学和放射组学模型中的分段剂量分布预测鼻咽癌患者放疗期间的口干症状","authors":"Xushi ZHANG , Wanjia ZHENG , Sijuan HUANG , Haojiang LI , Zhisheng BI , Xin YANG","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Xerostomia prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy using segmental dose distribution in dosiomics and radiomics models\",\"authors\":\"Xushi ZHANG , Wanjia ZHENG , Sijuan HUANG , Haojiang LI , Zhisheng BI , Xin YANG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136883752400318X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136883752400318X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Xerostomia prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy using segmental dose distribution in dosiomics and radiomics models
Objectives
This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.
Materials and methods
Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).
Results and conclusion
Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.
期刊介绍:
Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck.
Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.