利用剂量组学和放射组学模型中的分段剂量分布预测鼻咽癌患者放疗期间的口干症状

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Oral oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107000
Xushi ZHANG , Wanjia ZHENG , Sijuan HUANG , Haojiang LI , Zhisheng BI , Xin YANG
{"title":"利用剂量组学和放射组学模型中的分段剂量分布预测鼻咽癌患者放疗期间的口干症状","authors":"Xushi ZHANG ,&nbsp;Wanjia ZHENG ,&nbsp;Sijuan HUANG ,&nbsp;Haojiang LI ,&nbsp;Zhisheng BI ,&nbsp;Xin YANG","doi":"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19716,"journal":{"name":"Oral oncology","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107000"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Xerostomia prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy using segmental dose distribution in dosiomics and radiomics models\",\"authors\":\"Xushi ZHANG ,&nbsp;Wanjia ZHENG ,&nbsp;Sijuan HUANG ,&nbsp;Haojiang LI ,&nbsp;Zhisheng BI ,&nbsp;Xin YANG\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).</p></div><div><h3>Results and conclusion</h3><p>Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oral oncology\",\"volume\":\"158 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107000\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oral oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136883752400318X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136883752400318X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在整合放射组学和剂量组学特征,建立鼻咽癌放疗后口干舌燥(XM)的预测模型。该研究探讨了不同的特征提取方法和剂量范围对模型性能的影响。材料与方法对363名鼻咽癌患者的数据进行了回顾性分析。我们首创了一种剂量分段策略,将总体剂量分布(OD)以 15 Gy 的间隔分为四个分段剂量分布(SD)。通过手动定义和深度学习提取特征,应用 OD 或 SD 并整合放射组学和剂量组学,得出相应的特征得分(手动定义放射组学,MDR;手动定义剂量组学,MDD;基于深度学习的放射组学,DLR;基于深度学习的剂量组学,DLD)。结果和结论在 OD 下,O(DLR_DLD) 表现出卓越的性能,最佳曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.81,平均曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.71。在 SD 范围内,S(DLR_DLD) 超越了其他模型,最佳曲线下面积为 0.90,平均曲线下面积为 0.85。因此,将剂量组学整合到放射组学中可以提高预测效果。剂量分割策略有助于提取更深层次的信息。这表明 ScoreDLR 和 ScoreMDR 与 XM 呈负相关,而从超过 15 Gy 的 SD 导出的 ScoreDLD 与 XM 呈正相关。在特征提取方面,深度学习优于人工定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Xerostomia prediction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma during radiotherapy using segmental dose distribution in dosiomics and radiomics models

Objectives

This study aimed to integrate radiomics and dosiomics features to develop a predictive model for xerostomia (XM) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy. It explores the influence of distinct feature extraction methods and dose ranges on the performance.

Materials and methods

Data from 363 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. We pioneered a dose-segmentation strategy, where the overall dose distribution (OD) was divided into four segmental dose distributions (SDs) at intervals of 15 Gy. Features were extracted using manual definition and deep learning, applying OD or SD and integrating radiomics and dosiomics, yielding corresponding feature scores (manually defined radiomics, MDR; manually defined dosiomics, MDD; deep learning-based radiomics, DLR; deep learning-based dosiomics, DLD). Subsequently, 18 models were developed by combining features and model types (random forest and support vector machine).

Results and conclusion

Under OD, O(DLR_DLD) demonstrated exceptional performance, with an optimal area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 and an average AUC of 0.71. Within SD, S(DLR_DLD) surpassed the other models, achieving an optimal AUC of 0.90 and an average AUC of 0.85. Therefore, the integration of dosiomics into radiomics can augment predictive efficacy. The dose-segmentation strategy can facilitate the extraction of more profound information. This indicates that ScoreDLR and ScoreMDR were negatively associated with XM, whereas ScoreDLD, derived from SD exceeding 15 Gy, displayed a positive association with XM. For feature extraction, deep learning was superior to manual definition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oral oncology
Oral oncology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
505
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Oral Oncology is an international interdisciplinary journal which publishes high quality original research, clinical trials and review articles, editorials, and commentaries relating to the etiopathogenesis, epidemiology, prevention, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neoplasms in the head and neck. Oral Oncology is of interest to head and neck surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists, maxillo-facial surgeons, oto-rhino-laryngologists, plastic surgeons, pathologists, scientists, oral medical specialists, special care dentists, dental care professionals, general dental practitioners, public health physicians, palliative care physicians, nurses, radiologists, radiographers, dieticians, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, nutritionists, clinical and health psychologists and counselors, professionals in end of life care, as well as others interested in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in the diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma compared with conventional papillary thyroid carcinoma in pediatric populations Induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Efficacy and safety of the TPC regimen compared to GP and TPF Delayed diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) in head & neck cancers – A systematic review and meta-analysis Critical reflections on the clinical implementation of 3D-Printed oral stents for radiotherapy patients Evaluation of the 10 %-rule in sentinel lymph node biopsy for clinically node-negative oral squamous cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1