根据偏好将病人分配到疗养院

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2024.100442
R.J. Arntzen , R. Bekker , R.D. van der Mei
{"title":"根据偏好将病人分配到疗养院","authors":"R.J. Arntzen ,&nbsp;R. Bekker ,&nbsp;R.D. van der Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2024.100442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many countries, the rapid aging of the population leads to an additional burden on already stretched long-term care systems. This often manifests itself in excessive waiting times for long-term care centers, and in abandonments (i.e., patients passing away while they are waiting). Interestingly, in practice, long waiting times are not caused by a lack of available total capacity in the system, but by systematic inefficiencies in the allocation of patients, each with their personal preferences and (in)flexibility, to geographically distributed care centers.</p><p>Motivated by this, we propose a new and easy-to-implement method for the optimal allocation of patients-in-need to nursing homes, balancing the trade-off between the waiting time performance and the individual patients’ preferences and levels of flexibility. The optimal placement policy found by solving a Markov Decision Process demonstrates that for small instances, the mean optimality gap of the allocation model is equal to 1. 3%. We validate a simulation model for a real-life use case of allocating somatic patients to nursing homes in the Amsterdam area. The results show that if more patient replacements are approved, the allocation model can reduce the abandonment fraction under the current policy from 32.2% to 7.4% and waiting times at the same time. Moreover, with the allocation model individual preferences can be served better, which thus provides a powerful means to face the increasing need for patient-centered and sustainable long-term care solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"42 ","pages":"Article 100442"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692324000237/pdfft?md5=1ff89ed516df0e27c78fae8dc970cfc3&pid=1-s2.0-S2211692324000237-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes\",\"authors\":\"R.J. Arntzen ,&nbsp;R. Bekker ,&nbsp;R.D. van der Mei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orhc.2024.100442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In many countries, the rapid aging of the population leads to an additional burden on already stretched long-term care systems. This often manifests itself in excessive waiting times for long-term care centers, and in abandonments (i.e., patients passing away while they are waiting). Interestingly, in practice, long waiting times are not caused by a lack of available total capacity in the system, but by systematic inefficiencies in the allocation of patients, each with their personal preferences and (in)flexibility, to geographically distributed care centers.</p><p>Motivated by this, we propose a new and easy-to-implement method for the optimal allocation of patients-in-need to nursing homes, balancing the trade-off between the waiting time performance and the individual patients’ preferences and levels of flexibility. The optimal placement policy found by solving a Markov Decision Process demonstrates that for small instances, the mean optimality gap of the allocation model is equal to 1. 3%. We validate a simulation model for a real-life use case of allocating somatic patients to nursing homes in the Amsterdam area. The results show that if more patient replacements are approved, the allocation model can reduce the abandonment fraction under the current policy from 32.2% to 7.4% and waiting times at the same time. Moreover, with the allocation model individual preferences can be served better, which thus provides a powerful means to face the increasing need for patient-centered and sustainable long-term care solutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692324000237/pdfft?md5=1ff89ed516df0e27c78fae8dc970cfc3&pid=1-s2.0-S2211692324000237-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692324000237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692324000237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多国家,人口的快速老龄化导致本已捉襟见肘的长期护理系统负担加重。这往往表现为长期护理中心的等候时间过长,以及病人被遗弃(即病人在等候期间去世)。有趣的是,在实践中,漫长的等待时间并不是由于系统中可用的总容量不足造成的,而是由于在将病人(每个人都有其个人偏好和(不)灵活性)分配到地理上分散的护理中心时存在系统性的低效率。受此启发,我们提出了一种新的、易于实施的方法,用于将有需要的病人优化分配到护理院,在等待时间表现与病人个人偏好和灵活性水平之间进行权衡。通过求解马尔可夫决策过程找到的最优安置策略表明,对于小实例,分配模型的平均最优性差距等于 1.3%。我们在阿姆斯特丹地区将躯体病人分配到疗养院的真实案例中验证了仿真模型。结果表明,如果批准更多的病人替换,分配模式就能将现行政策下的放弃率从 32.2% 降至 7.4%,同时减少等待时间。此外,分配模式还能更好地满足个人偏好,从而为满足日益增长的以患者为中心和可持续的长期护理解决方案需求提供了有力手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes

In many countries, the rapid aging of the population leads to an additional burden on already stretched long-term care systems. This often manifests itself in excessive waiting times for long-term care centers, and in abandonments (i.e., patients passing away while they are waiting). Interestingly, in practice, long waiting times are not caused by a lack of available total capacity in the system, but by systematic inefficiencies in the allocation of patients, each with their personal preferences and (in)flexibility, to geographically distributed care centers.

Motivated by this, we propose a new and easy-to-implement method for the optimal allocation of patients-in-need to nursing homes, balancing the trade-off between the waiting time performance and the individual patients’ preferences and levels of flexibility. The optimal placement policy found by solving a Markov Decision Process demonstrates that for small instances, the mean optimality gap of the allocation model is equal to 1. 3%. We validate a simulation model for a real-life use case of allocating somatic patients to nursing homes in the Amsterdam area. The results show that if more patient replacements are approved, the allocation model can reduce the abandonment fraction under the current policy from 32.2% to 7.4% and waiting times at the same time. Moreover, with the allocation model individual preferences can be served better, which thus provides a powerful means to face the increasing need for patient-centered and sustainable long-term care solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification A modeling framework for evaluating proactive and reactive nurse rostering strategies — A case study from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1