开发临床预测模型:分步指南

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2023-078276
Orestis Efthimiou, Michael Seo, Konstantina Chalkou, Thomas Debray, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti
{"title":"开发临床预测模型:分步指南","authors":"Orestis Efthimiou, Michael Seo, Konstantina Chalkou, Thomas Debray, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2023-078276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Predicting future outcomes of patients is essential to clinical practice, with many prediction models published each year. Empirical evidence suggests that published studies often have severe methodological limitations, which undermine their usefulness. This article presents a step-by-step guide to help researchers develop and evaluate a clinical prediction model. The guide covers best practices in defining the aim and users, selecting data sources, addressing missing data, exploring alternative modelling options, and assessing model performance. The steps are illustrated using an example from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Comprehensive R code is also provided. Clinical prediction models aim to forecast future health outcomes given a set of baseline predictors to facilitate medical decision making and improve people’s health outcomes.1 Prediction models are becoming increasingly popular, with many new ones published each year. For example, a review of prediction models identified 263 prediction models in obstetrics alone2; another review found 606 models related to covid-19.3 Interest in predicting health outcomes has been heightened by the increasing availability of big data,4 which has also led to the uptake of machine learning methods for prognostic research in medicine.56 Several resources are available to support prognostic research. The PROGRESS (prognosis research strategy) framework provides detailed guidance on different types of prognostic research.789 The TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement gives recommendations for reporting and has recently been extended to address prediction model research in clustered datasets.1011121314 PROBAST (prediction model risk-of-bias assessment tool) provides a structured way to assess the risk of bias in a prediction modelling study.15 Several papers further outline good practices and provide software code.161718 Despite these resources, published prediction modelling studies often have severe methodological limitations. For instance, …","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide\",\"authors\":\"Orestis Efthimiou, Michael Seo, Konstantina Chalkou, Thomas Debray, Matthias Egger, Georgia Salanti\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2023-078276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Predicting future outcomes of patients is essential to clinical practice, with many prediction models published each year. Empirical evidence suggests that published studies often have severe methodological limitations, which undermine their usefulness. This article presents a step-by-step guide to help researchers develop and evaluate a clinical prediction model. The guide covers best practices in defining the aim and users, selecting data sources, addressing missing data, exploring alternative modelling options, and assessing model performance. The steps are illustrated using an example from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Comprehensive R code is also provided. Clinical prediction models aim to forecast future health outcomes given a set of baseline predictors to facilitate medical decision making and improve people’s health outcomes.1 Prediction models are becoming increasingly popular, with many new ones published each year. For example, a review of prediction models identified 263 prediction models in obstetrics alone2; another review found 606 models related to covid-19.3 Interest in predicting health outcomes has been heightened by the increasing availability of big data,4 which has also led to the uptake of machine learning methods for prognostic research in medicine.56 Several resources are available to support prognostic research. The PROGRESS (prognosis research strategy) framework provides detailed guidance on different types of prognostic research.789 The TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement gives recommendations for reporting and has recently been extended to address prediction model research in clustered datasets.1011121314 PROBAST (prediction model risk-of-bias assessment tool) provides a structured way to assess the risk of bias in a prediction modelling study.15 Several papers further outline good practices and provide software code.161718 Despite these resources, published prediction modelling studies often have severe methodological limitations. For instance, …\",\"PeriodicalId\":22388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The BMJ\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The BMJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测患者的未来预后对临床实践至关重要,每年都有许多预测模型发表。经验证据表明,已发表的研究往往存在严重的方法论局限性,从而削弱了其实用性。本文提供了一份循序渐进的指南,帮助研究人员开发和评估临床预测模型。该指南涵盖了定义目标和用户、选择数据源、处理缺失数据、探索其他建模方案以及评估模型性能等方面的最佳实践。以复发缓解型多发性硬化症为例对这些步骤进行了说明。此外还提供了全面的 R 代码。临床预测模型旨在根据一组基线预测因子预测未来的健康结果,以促进医疗决策并改善人们的健康状况1。例如,一项关于预测模型的综述发现,仅产科就有 263 个预测模型2 ;另一项综述发现,与 covid-19 相关的模型有 606 个。3 人们对预测健康结果的兴趣因大数据4 的日益普及而提高,这也导致了机器学习方法在医学预后研究中的应用。PROGRESS(预后研究策略)框架为不同类型的预后研究提供了详细指导。789 TRIPOD(针对个体预后或诊断的多变量预测模型的透明报告)声明为报告提供了建议,并在近期扩展到聚类数据集中的预测模型研究。PROBAST(预测模型偏倚风险评估工具)为评估预测建模研究中的偏倚风险提供了一种结构化的方法。例如,...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing clinical prediction models: a step-by-step guide
Predicting future outcomes of patients is essential to clinical practice, with many prediction models published each year. Empirical evidence suggests that published studies often have severe methodological limitations, which undermine their usefulness. This article presents a step-by-step guide to help researchers develop and evaluate a clinical prediction model. The guide covers best practices in defining the aim and users, selecting data sources, addressing missing data, exploring alternative modelling options, and assessing model performance. The steps are illustrated using an example from relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Comprehensive R code is also provided. Clinical prediction models aim to forecast future health outcomes given a set of baseline predictors to facilitate medical decision making and improve people’s health outcomes.1 Prediction models are becoming increasingly popular, with many new ones published each year. For example, a review of prediction models identified 263 prediction models in obstetrics alone2; another review found 606 models related to covid-19.3 Interest in predicting health outcomes has been heightened by the increasing availability of big data,4 which has also led to the uptake of machine learning methods for prognostic research in medicine.56 Several resources are available to support prognostic research. The PROGRESS (prognosis research strategy) framework provides detailed guidance on different types of prognostic research.789 The TRIPOD (transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis) statement gives recommendations for reporting and has recently been extended to address prediction model research in clustered datasets.1011121314 PROBAST (prediction model risk-of-bias assessment tool) provides a structured way to assess the risk of bias in a prediction modelling study.15 Several papers further outline good practices and provide software code.161718 Despite these resources, published prediction modelling studies often have severe methodological limitations. For instance, …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leprosy: Jordan becomes first country to eliminate disease. Partha Kar: We need honest, sensible conversation about physician associates-not false promises. Abolish NHS England and overhaul management to improve NHS productivity, says think tank. Optimising inhaled therapy for patients with asthma. Are India's regulatory gaps leaving patients with substandard mental health counsellors?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1