{"title":"利用生物阻抗测定腹膜透析过程中的腹腔外液和腹腔内液","authors":"Fansan Zhu;Laura Rosales Merlo;Lela Tisdale;Maricar Villamar;Peter Kotanko","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2024.3408635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<italic>Objective:</i>\n In peritoneal dialysis (PD), ultrafiltration (UF) failure is commonly attributed to dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane, resulting in decreased ultrafiltration volume (UFV). Our objective was to evaluate whether fluid absorption and UF can be assessed by monitoring intraperitoneal fluid using segmental bioimpedance analysis (sBIA). \n<italic>Methods:</i>\n Twenty PD patients were studied during either a peritoneal equilibration test (PET; n = 7) or automated PD (APD; n = 13). Eight electrodes were positioned on the lower abdomen and connected to a bioimpedance device (Hydra 4200). A physical model of abdominal extracellular volume (V\n<sub>ABD</sub>\n) was introduced, consisting of the fluid in extraperitoneal (V\n<sub>EPF</sub>\n) and the intraperitoneal cavity (V\n<sub>IPF</sub>\n). The change in the fluid surrounding the peritoneal cavity (ΔV\n<sub>EPF</sub>\n) was determined by assessing the difference in V\n<sub>EPF</sub>\n before and after PD. ΔV\n<sub>Dwell</sub>\n was calculated as the difference between V\n<sub>ABD</sub>\n at the end and the start of the dialysate dwell. The rate of ΔV\n<sub>Dwell</sub>\n change due to UF or absorption can be estimated from V\n<sub>ABD</sub>\n profiles. Total fluid (V\n<sub>IPF, D</sub>\n) in the peritoneal cavity was calculated which was used to compare actual drain volume (V\n<sub>Drain</sub>\n). \n<italic>Results:</i>\n V\n<sub>Drain</sub>\n and V\n<sub>IPF, D</sub>\n exhibited a strong correlation (PET: R\n<sup>2</sup>\n=0.98, p<0.0001;>2</sup>\n=0.94, p<0.0001).>EPF</sub>\n (ΔV\n<sub>EPF</sub>\n=0) was linked to rapid glucose transport, as measured by standard PET. \n<italic>Conclusion:</i>\n This study presents a new model utilizing a bioimpedance method to monitor fluid volume across the peritoneal membrane. While the limitation of peritoneal residual volume remains unknown, this approach holds promise for providing a direct measurement of fluid transport during PD.","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"71 12","pages":"3350-3357"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of Extra- and Intraperitoneal Fluid During Peritoneal Dialysis Using Bioimpedance\",\"authors\":\"Fansan Zhu;Laura Rosales Merlo;Lela Tisdale;Maricar Villamar;Peter Kotanko\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBME.2024.3408635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<italic>Objective:</i>\\n In peritoneal dialysis (PD), ultrafiltration (UF) failure is commonly attributed to dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane, resulting in decreased ultrafiltration volume (UFV). Our objective was to evaluate whether fluid absorption and UF can be assessed by monitoring intraperitoneal fluid using segmental bioimpedance analysis (sBIA). \\n<italic>Methods:</i>\\n Twenty PD patients were studied during either a peritoneal equilibration test (PET; n = 7) or automated PD (APD; n = 13). Eight electrodes were positioned on the lower abdomen and connected to a bioimpedance device (Hydra 4200). A physical model of abdominal extracellular volume (V\\n<sub>ABD</sub>\\n) was introduced, consisting of the fluid in extraperitoneal (V\\n<sub>EPF</sub>\\n) and the intraperitoneal cavity (V\\n<sub>IPF</sub>\\n). The change in the fluid surrounding the peritoneal cavity (ΔV\\n<sub>EPF</sub>\\n) was determined by assessing the difference in V\\n<sub>EPF</sub>\\n before and after PD. ΔV\\n<sub>Dwell</sub>\\n was calculated as the difference between V\\n<sub>ABD</sub>\\n at the end and the start of the dialysate dwell. The rate of ΔV\\n<sub>Dwell</sub>\\n change due to UF or absorption can be estimated from V\\n<sub>ABD</sub>\\n profiles. Total fluid (V\\n<sub>IPF, D</sub>\\n) in the peritoneal cavity was calculated which was used to compare actual drain volume (V\\n<sub>Drain</sub>\\n). \\n<italic>Results:</i>\\n V\\n<sub>Drain</sub>\\n and V\\n<sub>IPF, D</sub>\\n exhibited a strong correlation (PET: R\\n<sup>2</sup>\\n=0.98, p<0.0001;>2</sup>\\n=0.94, p<0.0001).>EPF</sub>\\n (ΔV\\n<sub>EPF</sub>\\n=0) was linked to rapid glucose transport, as measured by standard PET. \\n<italic>Conclusion:</i>\\n This study presents a new model utilizing a bioimpedance method to monitor fluid volume across the peritoneal membrane. While the limitation of peritoneal residual volume remains unknown, this approach holds promise for providing a direct measurement of fluid transport during PD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"71 12\",\"pages\":\"3350-3357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10664005/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10664005/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of Extra- and Intraperitoneal Fluid During Peritoneal Dialysis Using Bioimpedance
Objective:
In peritoneal dialysis (PD), ultrafiltration (UF) failure is commonly attributed to dysfunction of the peritoneal membrane, resulting in decreased ultrafiltration volume (UFV). Our objective was to evaluate whether fluid absorption and UF can be assessed by monitoring intraperitoneal fluid using segmental bioimpedance analysis (sBIA).
Methods:
Twenty PD patients were studied during either a peritoneal equilibration test (PET; n = 7) or automated PD (APD; n = 13). Eight electrodes were positioned on the lower abdomen and connected to a bioimpedance device (Hydra 4200). A physical model of abdominal extracellular volume (V
ABD
) was introduced, consisting of the fluid in extraperitoneal (V
EPF
) and the intraperitoneal cavity (V
IPF
). The change in the fluid surrounding the peritoneal cavity (ΔV
EPF
) was determined by assessing the difference in V
EPF
before and after PD. ΔV
Dwell
was calculated as the difference between V
ABD
at the end and the start of the dialysate dwell. The rate of ΔV
Dwell
change due to UF or absorption can be estimated from V
ABD
profiles. Total fluid (V
IPF, D
) in the peritoneal cavity was calculated which was used to compare actual drain volume (V
Drain
).
Results:
V
Drain
and V
IPF, D
exhibited a strong correlation (PET: R
2
=0.98, p<0.0001;>2
=0.94, p<0.0001).>EPF
(ΔV
EPF
=0) was linked to rapid glucose transport, as measured by standard PET.
Conclusion:
This study presents a new model utilizing a bioimpedance method to monitor fluid volume across the peritoneal membrane. While the limitation of peritoneal residual volume remains unknown, this approach holds promise for providing a direct measurement of fluid transport during PD.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.