全科医生对特应性皮炎患者的医疗保健--德国全国调查。

IF 5.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1111/ddg.15529
Anna Langenbruch, Valerie Andrees, Martin Scherer, Matthias Augustin
{"title":"全科医生对特应性皮炎患者的医疗保健--德国全国调查。","authors":"Anna Langenbruch, Valerie Andrees, Martin Scherer, Matthias Augustin","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epidemiological studies on the health care of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in dermatological treatment in Germany indicate no improvements within 10 years. In addition to dermatologists, general practitioners (GPs) are particularly involved in AD treatment. This study analyzed the health care situation of adult patients with AD by GPs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The cross-sectional questionnaire survey \"PsoADA\" was conducted from 2019 to 2021 in general practices throughout Germany and the results were compared with previous data from dermatology care (AtopicHealth2, 2017-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 patients (mean age: 40 years, 62.2% female), 39.2% received additional treatment by a dermatologist (GP+D). 20.7% of GP+D and 5.7% of patients in GP treatment only (GP only) had severe AD (p < 0.01, AtopicHealth2: 27.6%). Major limitations in quality of life were reported by 31.0% (GP+D) versus 3.4% (GP only) (p < 0.001, AtopicHealth2: 31.6%). Most patients received topicals, mainly glucocorticosteroids. Calcineurin inhibitors were currently administered by 2.7% (PsoADA total). Patient education was reported by 5.7% (PsoADA total).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A considerable proportion of patients with AD in GP care shows poor outcomes, as has been observed in dermatological care - possibly due to the lack of use of modern systemic therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare of patients with atopic dermatitis by general practitioners - a nationwide survey in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Langenbruch, Valerie Andrees, Martin Scherer, Matthias Augustin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddg.15529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Epidemiological studies on the health care of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in dermatological treatment in Germany indicate no improvements within 10 years. In addition to dermatologists, general practitioners (GPs) are particularly involved in AD treatment. This study analyzed the health care situation of adult patients with AD by GPs.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The cross-sectional questionnaire survey \\\"PsoADA\\\" was conducted from 2019 to 2021 in general practices throughout Germany and the results were compared with previous data from dermatology care (AtopicHealth2, 2017-19).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 patients (mean age: 40 years, 62.2% female), 39.2% received additional treatment by a dermatologist (GP+D). 20.7% of GP+D and 5.7% of patients in GP treatment only (GP only) had severe AD (p < 0.01, AtopicHealth2: 27.6%). Major limitations in quality of life were reported by 31.0% (GP+D) versus 3.4% (GP only) (p < 0.001, AtopicHealth2: 31.6%). Most patients received topicals, mainly glucocorticosteroids. Calcineurin inhibitors were currently administered by 2.7% (PsoADA total). Patient education was reported by 5.7% (PsoADA total).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A considerable proportion of patients with AD in GP care shows poor outcomes, as has been observed in dermatological care - possibly due to the lack of use of modern systemic therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15529\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:对德国特应性皮炎(AD)患者在皮肤病治疗方面的保健情况进行的流行病学研究表明,10 年内情况没有任何改善。除皮肤科医生外,全科医生(GPs)也特别参与特应性皮炎的治疗。本研究分析了全科医生对成人过敏性皮炎患者的医疗保健情况:2019年至2021年,在德国各地的全科医生中开展了横断面问卷调查 "PsoADA",并将调查结果与之前的皮肤病护理数据(AtopicHealth2,2017-19年)进行了比较:在150名患者(平均年龄:40岁,62.2%为女性)中,39.2%接受了皮肤科医生(GP+D)的额外治疗。20.7%的GP+D患者和5.7%的仅接受GP治疗的患者患有严重的注意力缺失症(P 结论:在接受GP+D治疗的患者中,有相当一部分患有严重的注意力缺失症:相当一部分接受全科医生治疗的 AD 患者疗效不佳,皮肤科治疗也是如此,这可能是由于缺乏使用现代系统疗法的缘故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Healthcare of patients with atopic dermatitis by general practitioners - a nationwide survey in Germany.

Background and objectives: Epidemiological studies on the health care of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) in dermatological treatment in Germany indicate no improvements within 10 years. In addition to dermatologists, general practitioners (GPs) are particularly involved in AD treatment. This study analyzed the health care situation of adult patients with AD by GPs.

Patients and methods: The cross-sectional questionnaire survey "PsoADA" was conducted from 2019 to 2021 in general practices throughout Germany and the results were compared with previous data from dermatology care (AtopicHealth2, 2017-19).

Results: Among 150 patients (mean age: 40 years, 62.2% female), 39.2% received additional treatment by a dermatologist (GP+D). 20.7% of GP+D and 5.7% of patients in GP treatment only (GP only) had severe AD (p < 0.01, AtopicHealth2: 27.6%). Major limitations in quality of life were reported by 31.0% (GP+D) versus 3.4% (GP only) (p < 0.001, AtopicHealth2: 31.6%). Most patients received topicals, mainly glucocorticosteroids. Calcineurin inhibitors were currently administered by 2.7% (PsoADA total). Patient education was reported by 5.7% (PsoADA total).

Conclusions: A considerable proportion of patients with AD in GP care shows poor outcomes, as has been observed in dermatological care - possibly due to the lack of use of modern systemic therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
期刊最新文献
Clinical and histopathological features of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with varying responses to cemiplimab. A garden as a habitat of rare keratinophilic fungi - relevant to man and beast. Primary cutaneous nocardiosis of both eyebrows due to eyebrow tattooing. Hyperkeratotic-encrusted plaques on the legs, arthralgias, and chronic otitis in a 11-year-old girl. Porocarcinoma of the foot: How would you handle this case without Mohs surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1