Chengyue Zhang, Lianfang Yu, Xiaoming Pan, Yuwei Lu, Kaiyu Pan
{"title":"1990-2019年中国和美国早发和晚发新生儿败血症的疾病负担比较及相关风险因素。","authors":"Chengyue Zhang, Lianfang Yu, Xiaoming Pan, Yuwei Lu, Kaiyu Pan","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2024.2396734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The morbidity and mortality rates of neonatal sepsis are high, with significant differences in risk factors and disease burden observed between developing and developed countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide evidence to support recommendations on improving public health policies using a comparative systematic analysis of the disease burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, the prevalence and incidence of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis and the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to both countries in both China and the United States of America (USA) were assessed. Furthermore, the DALYs and summary exposure values for the primary risk factors (short gestation and low birthweight) were analysed. Joinpoint regression models were used to analyse temporal trends in epidemiological indicators of neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1990 and 2019, the incidence and prevalence of neonatal sepsis demonstrated a significant upwards trend in China, whereas both were largely stable in the USA. A decreasing trend in the DALYs due to neonatal sepsis caused by short gestation and low birthweight in both sexes was observed in both countries, whereas a fluctuating increasing trend in years lived with disability was observed in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aim of the Chinese public health policy should be to control risk factors, learning from the advanced health policy planning and perinatal management experiences of developed countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"17 1","pages":"2396734"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disease burden comparison and associated risk factors of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis in China and the USA, 1990-2019.\",\"authors\":\"Chengyue Zhang, Lianfang Yu, Xiaoming Pan, Yuwei Lu, Kaiyu Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/16549716.2024.2396734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The morbidity and mortality rates of neonatal sepsis are high, with significant differences in risk factors and disease burden observed between developing and developed countries.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide evidence to support recommendations on improving public health policies using a comparative systematic analysis of the disease burden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, the prevalence and incidence of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis and the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to both countries in both China and the United States of America (USA) were assessed. Furthermore, the DALYs and summary exposure values for the primary risk factors (short gestation and low birthweight) were analysed. Joinpoint regression models were used to analyse temporal trends in epidemiological indicators of neonatal sepsis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1990 and 2019, the incidence and prevalence of neonatal sepsis demonstrated a significant upwards trend in China, whereas both were largely stable in the USA. A decreasing trend in the DALYs due to neonatal sepsis caused by short gestation and low birthweight in both sexes was observed in both countries, whereas a fluctuating increasing trend in years lived with disability was observed in China.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The aim of the Chinese public health policy should be to control risk factors, learning from the advanced health policy planning and perinatal management experiences of developed countries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Health Action\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"2396734\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Health Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2396734\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2396734","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新生儿败血症的发病率和死亡率都很高:新生儿败血症的发病率和死亡率很高,发展中国家和发达国家之间在风险因素和疾病负担方面存在显著差异:通过对疾病负担的比较性系统分析,为改进公共卫生政策的建议提供证据支持:方法:利用 2019 年全球疾病负担研究(Global Burden of Disease Study 2019)的数据,评估了中国和美利坚合众国(USA)早发和晚发新生儿败血症的流行率和发病率,以及由这两个国家造成的残疾调整生命年(DALYs)。此外,还分析了残疾调整生命年和主要风险因素(妊娠期短和出生体重低)的暴露值。采用连接点回归模型分析了新生儿败血症流行病学指标的时间趋势:结果:1990 年至 2019 年间,中国新生儿败血症的发病率和流行率呈显著上升趋势,而美国则基本保持稳定。两国因妊娠期短和出生体重低导致的新生儿败血症造成的残疾调整寿命年数均呈下降趋势,而中国的残疾调整寿命年数呈波动上升趋势:结论:中国公共卫生政策的目标应是控制风险因素,学习发达国家先进的卫生政策规划和围产期管理经验。
Disease burden comparison and associated risk factors of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis in China and the USA, 1990-2019.
Background: The morbidity and mortality rates of neonatal sepsis are high, with significant differences in risk factors and disease burden observed between developing and developed countries.
Objective: To provide evidence to support recommendations on improving public health policies using a comparative systematic analysis of the disease burden.
Methods: Using data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019, the prevalence and incidence of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis and the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) due to both countries in both China and the United States of America (USA) were assessed. Furthermore, the DALYs and summary exposure values for the primary risk factors (short gestation and low birthweight) were analysed. Joinpoint regression models were used to analyse temporal trends in epidemiological indicators of neonatal sepsis.
Results: Between 1990 and 2019, the incidence and prevalence of neonatal sepsis demonstrated a significant upwards trend in China, whereas both were largely stable in the USA. A decreasing trend in the DALYs due to neonatal sepsis caused by short gestation and low birthweight in both sexes was observed in both countries, whereas a fluctuating increasing trend in years lived with disability was observed in China.
Conclusions: The aim of the Chinese public health policy should be to control risk factors, learning from the advanced health policy planning and perinatal management experiences of developed countries.
期刊介绍:
Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research.
Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health.
Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.