描述有腘绳肌拉伤史的足球运动员在加速冲刺时的肌肉活动特征。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.52082/jssm.2024.656
Ryo Ohtsubo, Hiromi Saito, Norikazu Hirose
{"title":"描述有腘绳肌拉伤史的足球运动员在加速冲刺时的肌肉活动特征。","authors":"Ryo Ohtsubo, Hiromi Saito, Norikazu Hirose","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2024.656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to characterize muscle activity in male soccer players with a history of hamstring strain injuries (HSI) during accelerated sprinting. Thirteen patients each in the HSI group (history of HSI) and in the healthy group (with no history of HSI) were included. 26 male soccer players of which 13 with and 13 without HSI history were included in this study. Ten muscles were evaluated on electromyography activity during overground sprinting. The testing protocol consisted of a maximal sprint over a distance of 30 meters. One running stride was divided into the early stance phase, late stance phase, early swing phase, mid-swing phase, and late swing phase, and the average muscle activity per phase and the timing of the peak root-mean-square value appearance during each stride were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA (group × phase), and multiple comparison tests were performed using the Bonferroni method when the interaction or main effect was significant. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Gluteus maximus (Gmax), gluteus medius (Gmed), and external oblique (EO) showed activity differences based on HSI history. Gmax was 30% lower, EO was 20% lower, and Gmed was 40% higher in HSI group. This study suggests that, despite previous findings that HSI is most likely during the late swing phase, the HSI group shows a higher injury risk in the early stance phase. This is due to differences in trunk and gluteal muscle activity between the late swing and early stance phases compared to the healthy group. In summary, HSI group had lower activity in the muscles contributing to trunk instability, especially EO and Gmax, before and after ground impact during accelerated sprinting, compared to Healthy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"656-662"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Muscle Activity in Soccer Players with a History of Hamstring Strain Injuries during Accelerated Sprinting.\",\"authors\":\"Ryo Ohtsubo, Hiromi Saito, Norikazu Hirose\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2024.656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to characterize muscle activity in male soccer players with a history of hamstring strain injuries (HSI) during accelerated sprinting. Thirteen patients each in the HSI group (history of HSI) and in the healthy group (with no history of HSI) were included. 26 male soccer players of which 13 with and 13 without HSI history were included in this study. Ten muscles were evaluated on electromyography activity during overground sprinting. The testing protocol consisted of a maximal sprint over a distance of 30 meters. One running stride was divided into the early stance phase, late stance phase, early swing phase, mid-swing phase, and late swing phase, and the average muscle activity per phase and the timing of the peak root-mean-square value appearance during each stride were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA (group × phase), and multiple comparison tests were performed using the Bonferroni method when the interaction or main effect was significant. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Gluteus maximus (Gmax), gluteus medius (Gmed), and external oblique (EO) showed activity differences based on HSI history. Gmax was 30% lower, EO was 20% lower, and Gmed was 40% higher in HSI group. This study suggests that, despite previous findings that HSI is most likely during the late swing phase, the HSI group shows a higher injury risk in the early stance phase. This is due to differences in trunk and gluteal muscle activity between the late swing and early stance phases compared to the healthy group. In summary, HSI group had lower activity in the muscles contributing to trunk instability, especially EO and Gmax, before and after ground impact during accelerated sprinting, compared to Healthy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"656-662\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.656\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.656","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在分析有腿筋拉伤(HSI)病史的男性足球运动员在加速冲刺时的肌肉活动特征。研究对象包括 HSI 组(有 HSI 史)和健康组(无 HSI 史)各 13 名患者。研究对象包括 26 名男性足球运动员,其中 13 人有 HSI 史,13 人无 HSI 史。在地面冲刺时,对十块肌肉的肌电图活动进行了评估。测试方案包括在 30 米距离内进行最大冲刺。一个跑步步幅分为早期站立阶段、晚期站立阶段、早期摆动阶段、中期摆动阶段和晚期摆动阶段,并计算每个阶段的平均肌肉活动和每个步幅中出现峰值均方根值的时间。统计分析采用重复测量双向方差分析(组别 × 阶段),当交互作用或主效应显著时,采用 Bonferroni 方法进行多重比较检验。统计显著性水平设定为 p < 0.05。臀大肌(Gmax)、臀中肌(Gmed)和臀外斜肌(EO)在恒定压力指数历史记录中显示出活动差异。在 HSI 组中,Gmax 低 30%,EO 低 20%,Gmed 高 40%。这项研究表明,尽管之前的研究结果表明,在挥杆晚期阶段最有可能发生 HSI,但 HSI 组在站立早期阶段的受伤风险更高。这是因为与健康组相比,躯干和臀部肌肉在挥杆晚期和站立早期的活动存在差异。总之,与健康组相比,在加速冲刺过程中,加速冲刺组在地面冲击前后,导致躯干不稳定的肌肉活动较低,特别是 EO 和 Gmax。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Muscle Activity in Soccer Players with a History of Hamstring Strain Injuries during Accelerated Sprinting.

This study aimed to characterize muscle activity in male soccer players with a history of hamstring strain injuries (HSI) during accelerated sprinting. Thirteen patients each in the HSI group (history of HSI) and in the healthy group (with no history of HSI) were included. 26 male soccer players of which 13 with and 13 without HSI history were included in this study. Ten muscles were evaluated on electromyography activity during overground sprinting. The testing protocol consisted of a maximal sprint over a distance of 30 meters. One running stride was divided into the early stance phase, late stance phase, early swing phase, mid-swing phase, and late swing phase, and the average muscle activity per phase and the timing of the peak root-mean-square value appearance during each stride were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA (group × phase), and multiple comparison tests were performed using the Bonferroni method when the interaction or main effect was significant. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. Gluteus maximus (Gmax), gluteus medius (Gmed), and external oblique (EO) showed activity differences based on HSI history. Gmax was 30% lower, EO was 20% lower, and Gmed was 40% higher in HSI group. This study suggests that, despite previous findings that HSI is most likely during the late swing phase, the HSI group shows a higher injury risk in the early stance phase. This is due to differences in trunk and gluteal muscle activity between the late swing and early stance phases compared to the healthy group. In summary, HSI group had lower activity in the muscles contributing to trunk instability, especially EO and Gmax, before and after ground impact during accelerated sprinting, compared to Healthy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
期刊最新文献
The Release of Lipolytic Hormones during Various High-Intensity Interval and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Regimens and Their Effects on Fat Loss. Unilateral Plyometric Jump Training Shows Significantly More Effective than Bilateral Training in Improving Both Time to Stabilization and Peak Landing Force in Single-Leg Lend and Hold Test: A Randomized Multi-Arm Study Conducted Among Young Male Basketball Players. Validity and Reliability of OpenPose-Based Motion Analysis in Measuring Knee Valgus during Drop Vertical Jump Test. A Comparative Analysis of High-Intensity Technique-Specific Intervals and Short Sprint Interval Training in Taekwondo Athletes: Effects on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Anaerobic Power. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Impact of Resistance Training versus Aerobic Training on the Management of FGF-21 and Related Physiological Variables in Obese Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1