与控球游戏相比,小范围篮筐游戏在增强神经肌肉力量参数方面更为有效:一项针对年轻男性篮球运动员的随机对照研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Sports Science and Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.52082/jssm.2024.638
JianChun Cao, Wiradee Eakronnarongchai, Jakrin Duangkam
{"title":"与控球游戏相比,小范围篮筐游戏在增强神经肌肉力量参数方面更为有效:一项针对年轻男性篮球运动员的随机对照研究。","authors":"JianChun Cao, Wiradee Eakronnarongchai, Jakrin Duangkam","doi":"10.52082/jssm.2024.638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 8 weeks of small-sided basketball games (SSG) training using baskets (SSGbk) and ball possession games without baskets (SSGbpg) on various neuromuscular parameters in young male basketball players. Specifically, the study examined unilateral isometric knee flexor strength (KFS), unilateral isometric knee extensor strength (KES), bilateral countermovement jump peak power and peak landing force (CMJ), and leg land and hold test (LHT) peak landing force. This randomized controlled study included two experimental groups (SSGbk and SSGbpg) and one control group. Fifty regional competitive-level male youth basketball players (16.7 ± 0.5 years) were assigned to the groups. The experimental groups participated in two additional SSG weekly training sessions over 8 weeks. Both experimental groups were exposed to the same 2v2 to 4v4 formats of play and training volume, with the only difference being that one group performed ball possession games while the other participated in games targeting to score in the basket. Players were evaluated twice: once at baseline in the week prior to the intervention period, and again in the week post-intervention. The neuromuscular tests were conducted using force platforms. Significant interactions between time and groups were observed in KES (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.902), KFS (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.880), and CMJ peak power (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.630). Significant differences between groups were found post-intervention for the variables of KES (<i>p</i> = 0.017; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.159), KFS (<i>p</i> = 0.011; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.174), CMJ peak power (<i>p</i> = 0.017; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.160), CMJ peak landing force (<i>p</i> = 0.020; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.154), and LHT peak power (<i>p</i> = 0.012; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.171). In conclusion, our study highlights that the SSGbk significantly increases neuromuscular adaptations in young male basketball players. Conversely, our findings do not support the efficacy of SSGbpg in targeting these specific physical fitness variables. Therefore, the use of SSGs must be carefully considered, particularly in selecting task conditions, to ensure efficacy in interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Small-Sided Games with Baskets Are Significantly More Effective at Enhancing Neuromuscular Force Parameters Compared to Ball Possession Games: A Randomized Controlled Study in Young Male Basketball Players.\",\"authors\":\"JianChun Cao, Wiradee Eakronnarongchai, Jakrin Duangkam\",\"doi\":\"10.52082/jssm.2024.638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 8 weeks of small-sided basketball games (SSG) training using baskets (SSGbk) and ball possession games without baskets (SSGbpg) on various neuromuscular parameters in young male basketball players. Specifically, the study examined unilateral isometric knee flexor strength (KFS), unilateral isometric knee extensor strength (KES), bilateral countermovement jump peak power and peak landing force (CMJ), and leg land and hold test (LHT) peak landing force. This randomized controlled study included two experimental groups (SSGbk and SSGbpg) and one control group. Fifty regional competitive-level male youth basketball players (16.7 ± 0.5 years) were assigned to the groups. The experimental groups participated in two additional SSG weekly training sessions over 8 weeks. Both experimental groups were exposed to the same 2v2 to 4v4 formats of play and training volume, with the only difference being that one group performed ball possession games while the other participated in games targeting to score in the basket. Players were evaluated twice: once at baseline in the week prior to the intervention period, and again in the week post-intervention. The neuromuscular tests were conducted using force platforms. Significant interactions between time and groups were observed in KES (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.902), KFS (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.880), and CMJ peak power (<i>p</i> < 0.001; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.630). Significant differences between groups were found post-intervention for the variables of KES (<i>p</i> = 0.017; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.159), KFS (<i>p</i> = 0.011; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.174), CMJ peak power (<i>p</i> = 0.017; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.160), CMJ peak landing force (<i>p</i> = 0.020; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.154), and LHT peak power (<i>p</i> = 0.012; η <sub><i>p</i></sub> <sup>2</sup> = 0.171). In conclusion, our study highlights that the SSGbk significantly increases neuromuscular adaptations in young male basketball players. Conversely, our findings do not support the efficacy of SSGbpg in targeting these specific physical fitness variables. Therefore, the use of SSGs must be carefully considered, particularly in selecting task conditions, to ensure efficacy in interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366856/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.638\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Science and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2024.638","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较为期 8 周的使用篮筐的小范围篮球比赛(SSG)训练(SSGbk)和不使用篮筐的持球比赛(SSGbpg)对年轻男性篮球运动员各种神经肌肉参数的影响。具体而言,该研究考察了单侧等长膝关节屈肌力量(KFS)、单侧等长膝关节伸肌力量(KES)、双侧反运动跳跃峰值力量和着地峰值力量(CMJ)以及腿部着地和保持测试(LHT)着地峰值力量。这项随机对照研究包括两个实验组(SSGbk 和 SSGbpg)和一个对照组。50 名地区竞技水平的青少年男子篮球运动员(16.7 ± 0.5 岁)被分配到各组。实验组在 8 周内每周参加两次额外的 SSG 训练。两个实验组均采用相同的 2v2 至 4v4 的比赛形式和训练量,唯一不同的是,一组进行控球比赛,而另一组则参加以篮下得分为目标的比赛。对球员进行了两次评估:一次是干预期前一周的基线评估,另一次是干预期后一周的评估。神经肌肉测试使用力量平台进行。在 KES(p < 0.001;η p 2 = 0.902)、KFS(p < 0.001;η p 2 = 0.880)和 CMJ 峰值功率(p < 0.001;η p 2 = 0.630)方面,观察到时间和组别之间存在显著的交互作用。在 KES (p = 0.017; η p 2 = 0.159)、KFS (p = 0.011; η p 2 = 0.174)、CMJ 峰值功率 (p = 0.017; η p 2 = 0.160)、CMJ 峰值着地力 (p = 0.020; η p 2 = 0.154)和 LHT 峰值功率 (p = 0.012; η p 2 = 0.171)等变量方面,干预后发现组间存在显著差异。总之,我们的研究突出表明,SSGbk 能显著提高年轻男子篮球运动员的神经肌肉适应能力。相反,我们的研究结果并不支持 SSGbpg 针对这些特定体能变量的功效。因此,必须仔细考虑 SSG 的使用,尤其是在选择任务条件时,以确保干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Small-Sided Games with Baskets Are Significantly More Effective at Enhancing Neuromuscular Force Parameters Compared to Ball Possession Games: A Randomized Controlled Study in Young Male Basketball Players.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 8 weeks of small-sided basketball games (SSG) training using baskets (SSGbk) and ball possession games without baskets (SSGbpg) on various neuromuscular parameters in young male basketball players. Specifically, the study examined unilateral isometric knee flexor strength (KFS), unilateral isometric knee extensor strength (KES), bilateral countermovement jump peak power and peak landing force (CMJ), and leg land and hold test (LHT) peak landing force. This randomized controlled study included two experimental groups (SSGbk and SSGbpg) and one control group. Fifty regional competitive-level male youth basketball players (16.7 ± 0.5 years) were assigned to the groups. The experimental groups participated in two additional SSG weekly training sessions over 8 weeks. Both experimental groups were exposed to the same 2v2 to 4v4 formats of play and training volume, with the only difference being that one group performed ball possession games while the other participated in games targeting to score in the basket. Players were evaluated twice: once at baseline in the week prior to the intervention period, and again in the week post-intervention. The neuromuscular tests were conducted using force platforms. Significant interactions between time and groups were observed in KES (p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.902), KFS (p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.880), and CMJ peak power (p < 0.001; η p 2 = 0.630). Significant differences between groups were found post-intervention for the variables of KES (p = 0.017; η p 2 = 0.159), KFS (p = 0.011; η p 2 = 0.174), CMJ peak power (p = 0.017; η p 2 = 0.160), CMJ peak landing force (p = 0.020; η p 2 = 0.154), and LHT peak power (p = 0.012; η p 2 = 0.171). In conclusion, our study highlights that the SSGbk significantly increases neuromuscular adaptations in young male basketball players. Conversely, our findings do not support the efficacy of SSGbpg in targeting these specific physical fitness variables. Therefore, the use of SSGs must be carefully considered, particularly in selecting task conditions, to ensure efficacy in interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Science and Medicine (JSSM) is a non-profit making scientific electronic journal, publishing research and review articles, together with case studies, in the fields of sports medicine and the exercise sciences. JSSM is published quarterly in March, June, September and December. JSSM also publishes editorials, a "letter to the editor" section, abstracts from international and national congresses, panel meetings, conferences and symposia, and can function as an open discussion forum on significant issues of current interest.
期刊最新文献
The Release of Lipolytic Hormones during Various High-Intensity Interval and Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training Regimens and Their Effects on Fat Loss. Unilateral Plyometric Jump Training Shows Significantly More Effective than Bilateral Training in Improving Both Time to Stabilization and Peak Landing Force in Single-Leg Lend and Hold Test: A Randomized Multi-Arm Study Conducted Among Young Male Basketball Players. Validity and Reliability of OpenPose-Based Motion Analysis in Measuring Knee Valgus during Drop Vertical Jump Test. A Comparative Analysis of High-Intensity Technique-Specific Intervals and Short Sprint Interval Training in Taekwondo Athletes: Effects on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Anaerobic Power. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Determine the Impact of Resistance Training versus Aerobic Training on the Management of FGF-21 and Related Physiological Variables in Obese Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1