在新加坡,重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症和强迫症。

IF 2.5 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496
Si Jia Ye, LinShan Lu, Hui Huang Phu, Xiao Wei Tan, Phern Chern Tor
{"title":"在新加坡,重复经颅磁刺激治疗重度抑郁症和强迫症。","authors":"Si Jia Ye, LinShan Lu, Hui Huang Phu, Xiao Wei Tan, Phern Chern Tor","doi":"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there are few studies on patient outcomes in Southeast Asia. In this study, we describe the clinical profile and outcome of patients with MDD and OCD treated with rTMS in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A naturalistic retrospective study of 71 patients (inpatient and outpatient) who received rTMS treatment between June 2018 and April 2023 was conducted. The depressive and obsessive outcome rating scales used were clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and self-rated Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinician-rated and self-rated mood and general condition improved significantly. MADRS mean score improved from 28.1 (standard deviation [SD] 7.3) to 20.7 (SD 10.1) (<i>P</i><0.0001) (20.8% response rate/17% remission rate). CGI-S mean 4.6 (SD 0.8) improved to 3.3 (SD 1.2) (<i>P</i><0.0001). DASS-21 total mean improved from 67.3 (SD 24.6) to 49.6 (SD 28.0) (<i>P</i><0.0001). Y-BOCS mean score displayed a trend towards improvement from 30.1 (SD 7.5) to 27.2 (SD 6.9) (<i>P</i>=0.799). However, 44.4% of patients with OCD responded with a minimal 20% reduction in baseline Y-BOCS. Moreover, the subgroup of 35.8% of patients with less than 30 rTMS sessions had contributed disproportionately to nonresponse (85.7%). Patients who received rTMS treatment (>30 sessions) had a trend of larger improvement of MADRS score when compared to patients with (≤30 sessions) (9.4 [SD 9.7] versus 3.8 [SD 12.3] [<i>P</i>=0.078]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response and remission rates for MDD and OCD suggest patients have a good response to rTMS treatment. Dosing longer rTMS sessions after an acute course helps to maximise effectiveness. Further research to determine predictors of outcome and characterise clinical features of late responders to target treatment more effectively is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":502093,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"Si Jia Ye, LinShan Lu, Hui Huang Phu, Xiao Wei Tan, Phern Chern Tor\",\"doi\":\"10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there are few studies on patient outcomes in Southeast Asia. In this study, we describe the clinical profile and outcome of patients with MDD and OCD treated with rTMS in Singapore.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A naturalistic retrospective study of 71 patients (inpatient and outpatient) who received rTMS treatment between June 2018 and April 2023 was conducted. The depressive and obsessive outcome rating scales used were clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and self-rated Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinician-rated and self-rated mood and general condition improved significantly. MADRS mean score improved from 28.1 (standard deviation [SD] 7.3) to 20.7 (SD 10.1) (<i>P</i><0.0001) (20.8% response rate/17% remission rate). CGI-S mean 4.6 (SD 0.8) improved to 3.3 (SD 1.2) (<i>P</i><0.0001). DASS-21 total mean improved from 67.3 (SD 24.6) to 49.6 (SD 28.0) (<i>P</i><0.0001). Y-BOCS mean score displayed a trend towards improvement from 30.1 (SD 7.5) to 27.2 (SD 6.9) (<i>P</i>=0.799). However, 44.4% of patients with OCD responded with a minimal 20% reduction in baseline Y-BOCS. Moreover, the subgroup of 35.8% of patients with less than 30 rTMS sessions had contributed disproportionately to nonresponse (85.7%). Patients who received rTMS treatment (>30 sessions) had a trend of larger improvement of MADRS score when compared to patients with (≤30 sessions) (9.4 [SD 9.7] versus 3.8 [SD 12.3] [<i>P</i>=0.078]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response and remission rates for MDD and OCD suggest patients have a good response to rTMS treatment. Dosing longer rTMS sessions after an acute course helps to maximise effectiveness. Further research to determine predictors of outcome and characterise clinical features of late responders to target treatment more effectively is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":502093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)可用于治疗耐药性重度抑郁症(MDD)和强迫症(OCD),但在东南亚有关患者疗效的研究很少。在本研究中,我们描述了在新加坡接受经颅磁刺激治疗的 MDD 和 OCD 患者的临床概况和疗效:我们对 2018 年 6 月至 2023 年 4 月期间接受经颅磁刺激治疗的 71 名患者(住院和门诊患者)进行了自然回顾性研究。使用的抑郁和强迫结果评定量表为临床医生评定的蒙哥马利-奥斯伯格抑郁量表(MADRS)、耶鲁-布朗强迫量表(Y-BOCS)、临床整体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)和自我评定的抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21(DASS-21):结果:临床医生评分和自我评分的情绪和总体状况均有明显改善。MADRS平均分从28.1(标准差[SD] 7.3)提高到20.7(标准差10.1)(PPPP=0.799)。然而,44.4%的强迫症患者的基线Y-BOCS最低下降了20%。此外,35.8%的患者接受了少于30次的经颅磁刺激治疗,这部分患者的无应答比例过高(85.7%)。接受经颅磁刺激治疗(大于30次)的患者与接受经颅磁刺激治疗(小于30次)的患者相比,MADRS评分有更大的改善趋势(9.4 [SD 9.7] 对 3.8 [SD 12.3] [P=0.078]):MDD 和 OCD 的应答率和缓解率表明,患者对经颅磁刺激治疗有良好的应答。在急性疗程后,延长经颅磁刺激治疗的疗程有助于最大限度地提高疗效。建议开展进一步研究,以确定疗效预测因素和晚期反应者的临床特征,从而更有效地进行针对性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders in Singapore.

Introduction: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), but there are few studies on patient outcomes in Southeast Asia. In this study, we describe the clinical profile and outcome of patients with MDD and OCD treated with rTMS in Singapore.

Method: A naturalistic retrospective study of 71 patients (inpatient and outpatient) who received rTMS treatment between June 2018 and April 2023 was conducted. The depressive and obsessive outcome rating scales used were clinician-rated Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) and self-rated Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).

Results: Clinician-rated and self-rated mood and general condition improved significantly. MADRS mean score improved from 28.1 (standard deviation [SD] 7.3) to 20.7 (SD 10.1) (P<0.0001) (20.8% response rate/17% remission rate). CGI-S mean 4.6 (SD 0.8) improved to 3.3 (SD 1.2) (P<0.0001). DASS-21 total mean improved from 67.3 (SD 24.6) to 49.6 (SD 28.0) (P<0.0001). Y-BOCS mean score displayed a trend towards improvement from 30.1 (SD 7.5) to 27.2 (SD 6.9) (P=0.799). However, 44.4% of patients with OCD responded with a minimal 20% reduction in baseline Y-BOCS. Moreover, the subgroup of 35.8% of patients with less than 30 rTMS sessions had contributed disproportionately to nonresponse (85.7%). Patients who received rTMS treatment (>30 sessions) had a trend of larger improvement of MADRS score when compared to patients with (≤30 sessions) (9.4 [SD 9.7] versus 3.8 [SD 12.3] [P=0.078]).

Conclusion: Response and remission rates for MDD and OCD suggest patients have a good response to rTMS treatment. Dosing longer rTMS sessions after an acute course helps to maximise effectiveness. Further research to determine predictors of outcome and characterise clinical features of late responders to target treatment more effectively is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
2023 guidelines on the management of psoriasis by the Dermatological Society of Singapore. Facing death alone: An exploration of terminally ill individuals living alone in palliative care. Optimising paediatric urinary tract infection diagnos. Predictors of early removal of intragastric balloon due to intolerance: Insights from a multiethnic Asian cohort. Beyond survival: Addressing gaps in psychosocial support for survivors of childhood cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1