美国肺炎链球菌临床分离株对常用口服抗生素的高不敏感率(2019-2021 年)。

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY Open Forum Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofae470
Lalitagauri M Deshpande, Michael D Huband, Sarah Charbon, Mariana Castanheira, Rodrigo E Mendes
{"title":"美国肺炎链球菌临床分离株对常用口服抗生素的高不敏感率(2019-2021 年)。","authors":"Lalitagauri M Deshpande, Michael D Huband, Sarah Charbon, Mariana Castanheira, Rodrigo E Mendes","doi":"10.1093/ofid/ofae470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> isolates from the United States (n = 1038; 2019-2021) were susceptible to omadacycline (99.8%), levofloxacin (99.7%), and ceftriaxone (98.1%), whereas doxycycline (80.2%), oral penicillin (63.5%), cefpodoxime (76.8%), and azithromycin (54.4%) activity was limited. <i>Tet</i>(M) did not affect omadacycline activity but altered activity of older tetracyclines including doxycycline, suggesting omadacycline is an important option for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19517,"journal":{"name":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","volume":"11 9","pages":"ofae470"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370784/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Rates of Nonsusceptibility to Common Oral Antibiotics in <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> Clinical Isolates From the United States (2019-2021).\",\"authors\":\"Lalitagauri M Deshpande, Michael D Huband, Sarah Charbon, Mariana Castanheira, Rodrigo E Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ofid/ofae470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i> isolates from the United States (n = 1038; 2019-2021) were susceptible to omadacycline (99.8%), levofloxacin (99.7%), and ceftriaxone (98.1%), whereas doxycycline (80.2%), oral penicillin (63.5%), cefpodoxime (76.8%), and azithromycin (54.4%) activity was limited. <i>Tet</i>(M) did not affect omadacycline activity but altered activity of older tetracyclines including doxycycline, suggesting omadacycline is an important option for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"11 9\",\"pages\":\"ofae470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11370784/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Forum Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Forum Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

来自美国的肺炎链球菌分离株(n = 1038;2019-2021年)对奥美拉唑(99.8%)、左氧氟沙星(99.7%)和头孢曲松(98.1%)敏感,而对强力霉素(80.2%)、口服青霉素(63.5%)、头孢泊肟(76.8%)和阿奇霉素(54.4%)的活性有限。Tet(M)不影响奥马大环素的活性,但会改变包括多西环素在内的老式四环素的活性,这表明奥马大环素是治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的一个重要选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High Rates of Nonsusceptibility to Common Oral Antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae Clinical Isolates From the United States (2019-2021).

Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from the United States (n = 1038; 2019-2021) were susceptible to omadacycline (99.8%), levofloxacin (99.7%), and ceftriaxone (98.1%), whereas doxycycline (80.2%), oral penicillin (63.5%), cefpodoxime (76.8%), and azithromycin (54.4%) activity was limited. Tet(M) did not affect omadacycline activity but altered activity of older tetracyclines including doxycycline, suggesting omadacycline is an important option for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Open Forum Infectious Diseases Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
630
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Forum Infectious Diseases provides a global forum for the publication of clinical, translational, and basic research findings in a fully open access, online journal environment. The journal reflects the broad diversity of the field of infectious diseases, and focuses on the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice, with a particular emphasis on knowledge that holds the potential to improve patient care in populations around the world. Fully peer-reviewed, OFID supports the international community of infectious diseases experts by providing a venue for articles that further the understanding of all aspects of infectious diseases.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Cutaneous Opportunistic Mycobacterial and Fungal Infections in Adult-Onset Immunodeficiency Due to Anti-Interferon-Gamma Autoantibodies-Decoding Skin Involvement Patterns. Kinetics of Enteric Pathogen Quantity During Acute Diarrhea in Children in Resource-Limited Settings. Early Experience With Beta-Lactam Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in an Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) Program. Impact of National Policies Promoting Appropriate Antibiotic Use on Outpatient Prescriptions and Hospitalizations for Bacterial Complications of Acute Respiratory Infections in Japan: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis. Comparative Clinical Characteristics of ICU and Non-ICU Hospitalized Patients With Human Anaplasmosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1