纽带稳定性与创新绩效的双向因果关系

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Research Policy Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2024.105102
Yinghuan Wang , Jingjing Zhang , Yan Yan , Jiancheng Guan
{"title":"纽带稳定性与创新绩效的双向因果关系","authors":"Yinghuan Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan Yan ,&nbsp;Jiancheng Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Scholars increasingly focus on the tie stability of firms' alliance networks and regard innovation as its consequence. However, they overlook that a firm's innovation performance may shape its tie stability. This potential simultaneous causality is poorly accommodated in the empirical literature, which impedes progress in innovation and network research. From the relational embeddedness and behavioral perspectives, we propose a mutually reinforcing relationship between tie stability and innovation performance. A stochastic actor-oriented SIENA model enables us to investigate bidirectional causality. Longitudinal data on 876 firms from 2003 to 2014 were analyzed to find evidence of a self-reinforcing force; this relationship was moderated by collaborative purpose diversity. These findings support the bidirectional causality between tie stability and innovation and the contingency effect of alliance relationships, providing new insights into network research, the innovation literature, and practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48466,"journal":{"name":"Research Policy","volume":"53 10","pages":"Article 105102"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance\",\"authors\":\"Yinghuan Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Yan Yan ,&nbsp;Jiancheng Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.respol.2024.105102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Scholars increasingly focus on the tie stability of firms' alliance networks and regard innovation as its consequence. However, they overlook that a firm's innovation performance may shape its tie stability. This potential simultaneous causality is poorly accommodated in the empirical literature, which impedes progress in innovation and network research. From the relational embeddedness and behavioral perspectives, we propose a mutually reinforcing relationship between tie stability and innovation performance. A stochastic actor-oriented SIENA model enables us to investigate bidirectional causality. Longitudinal data on 876 firms from 2003 to 2014 were analyzed to find evidence of a self-reinforcing force; this relationship was moderated by collaborative purpose diversity. These findings support the bidirectional causality between tie stability and innovation and the contingency effect of alliance relationships, providing new insights into network research, the innovation literature, and practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Policy\",\"volume\":\"53 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 105102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001513\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733324001513","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的学者关注企业联盟网络的纽带稳定性,并将创新视为其结果。然而,他们忽略了企业的创新绩效可能会影响其纽带稳定性。这种潜在的同步因果关系在实证文献中没有得到很好的体现,从而阻碍了创新与网络研究的进展。我们从关系嵌入性和行为学的角度出发,提出了纽带稳定性与创新绩效之间相辅相成的关系。以随机行为者为导向的 SIENA 模型使我们能够研究双向因果关系。我们分析了 2003 年至 2014 年 876 家公司的纵向数据,发现了自我强化力量的证据;这种关系受到合作目的多样性的调节。这些研究结果支持纽带稳定性与创新之间的双向因果关系以及联盟关系的权变效应,为网络研究、创新文献和实践提供了新的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The bidirectional causality of tie stability and innovation performance

Scholars increasingly focus on the tie stability of firms' alliance networks and regard innovation as its consequence. However, they overlook that a firm's innovation performance may shape its tie stability. This potential simultaneous causality is poorly accommodated in the empirical literature, which impedes progress in innovation and network research. From the relational embeddedness and behavioral perspectives, we propose a mutually reinforcing relationship between tie stability and innovation performance. A stochastic actor-oriented SIENA model enables us to investigate bidirectional causality. Longitudinal data on 876 firms from 2003 to 2014 were analyzed to find evidence of a self-reinforcing force; this relationship was moderated by collaborative purpose diversity. These findings support the bidirectional causality between tie stability and innovation and the contingency effect of alliance relationships, providing new insights into network research, the innovation literature, and practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research Policy
Research Policy MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
182
期刊介绍: Research Policy (RP) articles explore the interaction between innovation, technology, or research, and economic, social, political, and organizational processes, both empirically and theoretically. All RP papers are expected to provide insights with implications for policy or management. Research Policy (RP) is a multidisciplinary journal focused on analyzing, understanding, and effectively addressing the challenges posed by innovation, technology, R&D, and science. This includes activities related to knowledge creation, diffusion, acquisition, and exploitation in the form of new or improved products, processes, or services, across economic, policy, management, organizational, and environmental dimensions.
期刊最新文献
“Meet me at the backdoor”: A multiple case study of academic entrepreneurs bypassing their technology transfer offices Governance of knowledge development in a public-private partnership: NASA's efforts to design the Space Shuttle Editorial Board Interfaces, social information processing, and diversity cascades: How board diversity influences invention output The Government Patent Register: A new resource for measuring U.S. government-funded patenting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1