2010-2019 年美国城乡颗粒物 (PM2.5) 浓度的地域变化

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Geohealth Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000920
Daniel J. Kilpatrick, Peiyin Hung, Elizabeth Crouch, Stella Self, Jeremy Cothran, Dwayne E. Porter, Jan M. Eberth
{"title":"2010-2019 年美国城乡颗粒物 (PM2.5) 浓度的地域变化","authors":"Daniel J. Kilpatrick,&nbsp;Peiyin Hung,&nbsp;Elizabeth Crouch,&nbsp;Stella Self,&nbsp;Jeremy Cothran,&nbsp;Dwayne E. Porter,&nbsp;Jan M. Eberth","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is a widely studied pollutant with substantial health impacts, yet little is known about the urban-rural differences across the United States. Trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in urban and rural census tracts between 2010 and 2019 were assessed alongside sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, poverty, and age. For 2010, we identified 13,474 rural tracts and 59,065 urban tracts. In 2019, 13,462 were rural and 59,055 urban. Urban tracts had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than rural tracts during this period. Levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were lower in rural tracts compared to urban and fell more rapidly in rural than urban. Rural tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 8.51 [2.24] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 6.41 [1.29] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Urban tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 9.56 [2.04] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.51 [1.40] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Rural and urban majority Black communities had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution levels (10.19 [1.64] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 9.79 [1.10] μg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively), in 2010. In 2019, they were: 7.75 [1.1] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.09 [0.78] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Majority Hispanic communities had higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels and were the highest urban concentration among all races/ethnicities (8.01 [1.73] μg/m<sup>3</sup>), however they were not the highest rural concentration among all races/ethnicities (6.22 [1.60] μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in 2019. Associations with higher levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were found with communities in the poorest quartile and with higher proportions of residents age&lt;15 years old. These findings suggest greater protections for those disproportionately exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> are needed, such as, increasing the availability of low-cost air quality monitors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000920","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geographic Variations in Urban-Rural Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019\",\"authors\":\"Daniel J. Kilpatrick,&nbsp;Peiyin Hung,&nbsp;Elizabeth Crouch,&nbsp;Stella Self,&nbsp;Jeremy Cothran,&nbsp;Dwayne E. Porter,&nbsp;Jan M. Eberth\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023GH000920\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) is a widely studied pollutant with substantial health impacts, yet little is known about the urban-rural differences across the United States. Trends of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in urban and rural census tracts between 2010 and 2019 were assessed alongside sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, poverty, and age. For 2010, we identified 13,474 rural tracts and 59,065 urban tracts. In 2019, 13,462 were rural and 59,055 urban. Urban tracts had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations than rural tracts during this period. Levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were lower in rural tracts compared to urban and fell more rapidly in rural than urban. Rural tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 8.51 [2.24] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 6.41 [1.29] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Urban tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 9.56 [2.04] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.51 [1.40] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Rural and urban majority Black communities had significantly higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution levels (10.19 [1.64] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 9.79 [1.10] μg/m<sup>3</sup> respectively), in 2010. In 2019, they were: 7.75 [1.1] μg/m<sup>3</sup> and 7.09 [0.78] μg/m<sup>3</sup>, respectively. Majority Hispanic communities had higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> levels and were the highest urban concentration among all races/ethnicities (8.01 [1.73] μg/m<sup>3</sup>), however they were not the highest rural concentration among all races/ethnicities (6.22 [1.60] μg/m<sup>3</sup>) in 2019. Associations with higher levels of PM<sub>2.5</sub> were found with communities in the poorest quartile and with higher proportions of residents age&lt;15 years old. These findings suggest greater protections for those disproportionately exposed to PM<sub>2.5</sub> are needed, such as, increasing the availability of low-cost air quality monitors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohealth\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000920\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000920\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

细颗粒物 2.5(PM2.5)是一种被广泛研究的对健康有重大影响的污染物,但人们对美国的城乡差异知之甚少。我们评估了 2010 年至 2019 年期间城市和农村人口普查区 PM2.5 的变化趋势以及社会人口特征,包括种族/民族、贫困和年龄。2010 年,我们确定了 13,474 个农村普查区和 59,065 个城市普查区。2019 年,农村地区为 13,462 个,城市地区为 59,055 个。在此期间,城市地区的 PM2.5 浓度明显高于农村地区。与城市相比,农村地区的 PM2.5 浓度较低,而且农村地区的 PM2.5 浓度下降速度快于城市地区。2010 年和 2019 年农村地区的年均值分别为 8.51 [2.24] μg/m3 和 6.41 [1.29] μg/m3。城市地区 2010 年和 2019 年的年均值分别为 9.56 [2.04] μg/m3 和 7.51 [1.40] μg/m3。2010 年,农村和城市黑人占多数的社区的 PM2.5 污染水平明显更高(分别为 10.19 [1.64] μg/m3 和 9.79 [1.10] μg/m3)。2019 年则为分别为 7.75 [1.1] μg/m3 和 7.09 [0.78] μg/m3。西班牙裔多数人社区的PM2.5水平较高,是所有种族/族裔中城市浓度最高的社区(8.01 [1.73] μg/m3),但在2019年,他们并不是所有种族/族裔中农村浓度最高的社区(6.22 [1.60] μg/m3)。PM2.5水平较高与最贫穷的四分位数社区和年龄在15岁以下的居民比例较高有关。这些研究结果表明,需要为那些过多暴露于 PM2.5 的人群提供更多保护,例如增加低成本空气质量监测器的供应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geographic Variations in Urban-Rural Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Concentrations in the United States, 2010–2019

Fine particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) is a widely studied pollutant with substantial health impacts, yet little is known about the urban-rural differences across the United States. Trends of PM2.5 in urban and rural census tracts between 2010 and 2019 were assessed alongside sociodemographic characteristics including race/ethnicity, poverty, and age. For 2010, we identified 13,474 rural tracts and 59,065 urban tracts. In 2019, 13,462 were rural and 59,055 urban. Urban tracts had significantly higher PM2.5 concentrations than rural tracts during this period. Levels of PM2.5 were lower in rural tracts compared to urban and fell more rapidly in rural than urban. Rural tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 8.51 [2.24] μg/m3 and 6.41 [1.29] μg/m3, respectively. Urban tract annual means for 2010 and 2019 were 9.56 [2.04] μg/m3 and 7.51 [1.40] μg/m3, respectively. Rural and urban majority Black communities had significantly higher PM2.5 pollution levels (10.19 [1.64] μg/m3 and 9.79 [1.10] μg/m3 respectively), in 2010. In 2019, they were: 7.75 [1.1] μg/m3 and 7.09 [0.78] μg/m3, respectively. Majority Hispanic communities had higher PM2.5 levels and were the highest urban concentration among all races/ethnicities (8.01 [1.73] μg/m3), however they were not the highest rural concentration among all races/ethnicities (6.22 [1.60] μg/m3) in 2019. Associations with higher levels of PM2.5 were found with communities in the poorest quartile and with higher proportions of residents age<15 years old. These findings suggest greater protections for those disproportionately exposed to PM2.5 are needed, such as, increasing the availability of low-cost air quality monitors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Planetary Health Booms: Unpacking the Surge in Research Across the Globe Through Joint-Point Analysis Satellite-Derived, Smartphone-Delivered Geospatial Cholera Risk Information for Vulnerable Populations Upstream Oil and Gas Production and Community COVID-19 Case and Mortality Rates in California, USA Association of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Constituents and Green Space With Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Methods for Quantifying Source-Specific Air Pollution Exposure to Serve Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Environmental Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1