Yonathan Agung , Emily Hladkowicz , Laura Boland , Husein Moloo , Luke T. Lavallée , Manoj M. Lalu , Daniel I. McIsaac
{"title":"择期非心脏手术后的虚弱与决策后悔:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Yonathan Agung , Emily Hladkowicz , Laura Boland , Husein Moloo , Luke T. Lavallée , Manoj M. Lalu , Daniel I. McIsaac","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality after surgery. The association of frailty with decisional regret is poorly defined. Our objective was to estimate the association of preoperative frailty with decisional regret status in the year after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicentre cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective noncardiac surgery. Decisional regret about having undergone surgery was ascertained at 30, 90, and 365 (primary time point) days after surgery using a 3-point ordinal scale. Bayesian ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the association of frailty with decisional regret, adjusted for surgery type, age, sex, and mental health conditions. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 669 patients; 293 (43.8%) lived with frailty. At 365 days after surgery, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) associating frailty with greater decisional regret was 2.21 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.98–5.09; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.97), which was attenuated after confounder adjustment (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CrI 0.84–3.36; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.93). Similar results were estimated at 30 and 90 days. Additional adjustment for baseline comorbidities and disability score substantially altered the OR at 365 days (0.89, 95% CrI 0.37–2.12; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.39). There was a high probability that surgery type was an effect modifier (non-orthopaedic: OR 1.90, 95% CrI 1.00–3.59; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.98); orthopaedic: OR 0.87, 95% CrI 0.41–1.91; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.36).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among older surgical patients, there appears to be a complex association with frailty and decisional regret, with substantial heterogeneity based on assumed causal pathways and surgery type. Future studies are required to untangle the complex interplay between these factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty and decisional regret after elective noncardiac surgery: a multicentre prospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Yonathan Agung , Emily Hladkowicz , Laura Boland , Husein Moloo , Luke T. Lavallée , Manoj M. Lalu , Daniel I. McIsaac\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality after surgery. The association of frailty with decisional regret is poorly defined. Our objective was to estimate the association of preoperative frailty with decisional regret status in the year after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicentre cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective noncardiac surgery. Decisional regret about having undergone surgery was ascertained at 30, 90, and 365 (primary time point) days after surgery using a 3-point ordinal scale. Bayesian ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the association of frailty with decisional regret, adjusted for surgery type, age, sex, and mental health conditions. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 669 patients; 293 (43.8%) lived with frailty. At 365 days after surgery, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) associating frailty with greater decisional regret was 2.21 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.98–5.09; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.97), which was attenuated after confounder adjustment (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CrI 0.84–3.36; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.93). Similar results were estimated at 30 and 90 days. Additional adjustment for baseline comorbidities and disability score substantially altered the OR at 365 days (0.89, 95% CrI 0.37–2.12; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.39). There was a high probability that surgery type was an effect modifier (non-orthopaedic: OR 1.90, 95% CrI 1.00–3.59; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.98); orthopaedic: OR 0.87, 95% CrI 0.41–1.91; <em>P</em>(OR>1)=0.36).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Among older surgical patients, there appears to be a complex association with frailty and decisional regret, with substantial heterogeneity based on assumed causal pathways and surgery type. Future studies are required to untangle the complex interplay between these factors.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224004641\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091224004641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Frailty and decisional regret after elective noncardiac surgery: a multicentre prospective cohort study
Background
Frailty is associated with morbidity and mortality after surgery. The association of frailty with decisional regret is poorly defined. Our objective was to estimate the association of preoperative frailty with decisional regret status in the year after surgery.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of a prospective, multicentre cohort study of patients aged ≥65 years who underwent elective noncardiac surgery. Decisional regret about having undergone surgery was ascertained at 30, 90, and 365 (primary time point) days after surgery using a 3-point ordinal scale. Bayesian ordinal logistic regression was used to estimate the association of frailty with decisional regret, adjusted for surgery type, age, sex, and mental health conditions. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted.
Results
We identified 669 patients; 293 (43.8%) lived with frailty. At 365 days after surgery, the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) associating frailty with greater decisional regret was 2.21 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0.98–5.09; P(OR>1)=0.97), which was attenuated after confounder adjustment (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CrI 0.84–3.36; P(OR>1)=0.93). Similar results were estimated at 30 and 90 days. Additional adjustment for baseline comorbidities and disability score substantially altered the OR at 365 days (0.89, 95% CrI 0.37–2.12; P(OR>1)=0.39). There was a high probability that surgery type was an effect modifier (non-orthopaedic: OR 1.90, 95% CrI 1.00–3.59; P(OR>1)=0.98); orthopaedic: OR 0.87, 95% CrI 0.41–1.91; P(OR>1)=0.36).
Conclusions
Among older surgical patients, there appears to be a complex association with frailty and decisional regret, with substantial heterogeneity based on assumed causal pathways and surgery type. Future studies are required to untangle the complex interplay between these factors.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience.
The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence.
Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.