Liyan Zhao, Bin Li, Ningkang Li, Jiamin Bao, Xiaoning Zhu, Kerong Hai
{"title":"评估术中利多卡因对妇科腹腔镜手术术后肩痛的预防作用:前瞻性随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。","authors":"Liyan Zhao, Bin Li, Ningkang Li, Jiamin Bao, Xiaoning Zhu, Kerong Hai","doi":"10.1111/jog.16053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative lidocaine in reducing the incidence of post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) after gynecologic laparoscopy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the lidocaine group, receiving an initial intravenous dose of lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) before anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/h, and the placebo group, receiving saline. The primary endpoint was the determination of PLSP incidence over a 72-h period post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included a comprehensive evaluation of pain intensity, as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), for shoulder, abdominal, and incisional pain within a 72-hour period postoperatively. Additionally, the endpoints involved the assessment of Lofencodeine or Parexib Sodium usage frequency, incidence of nausea and vomiting, duration of anesthesia and surgical procedure, as well as the duration of hospital stay.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our study did not demonstrate any significant benefit in the incidence of PLSP during the postoperative period. PLSP occurred in 14 out of 41 patients (34.1%) in the lidocaine group, compared with 15 out of 41 patients (36.6%) in the placebo group (<i>p</i> = 0.817). Intravenous lidocaine reduced abdominal pain scores and decreased the need for postoperative analgesics within 72 h after surgery. No significant differences were found in incisional and shoulder pain intensity, nausea and vomiting rates, or hospitalization duration between groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The infusion of lidocaine did not yield a reduction in the incidence or severity of PLSP in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","volume":"50 10","pages":"1902-1908"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of intraoperative lidocaine on the prevention of postoperative shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study\",\"authors\":\"Liyan Zhao, Bin Li, Ningkang Li, Jiamin Bao, Xiaoning Zhu, Kerong Hai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jog.16053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative lidocaine in reducing the incidence of post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) after gynecologic laparoscopy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the lidocaine group, receiving an initial intravenous dose of lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) before anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/h, and the placebo group, receiving saline. The primary endpoint was the determination of PLSP incidence over a 72-h period post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included a comprehensive evaluation of pain intensity, as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), for shoulder, abdominal, and incisional pain within a 72-hour period postoperatively. Additionally, the endpoints involved the assessment of Lofencodeine or Parexib Sodium usage frequency, incidence of nausea and vomiting, duration of anesthesia and surgical procedure, as well as the duration of hospital stay.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Our study did not demonstrate any significant benefit in the incidence of PLSP during the postoperative period. PLSP occurred in 14 out of 41 patients (34.1%) in the lidocaine group, compared with 15 out of 41 patients (36.6%) in the placebo group (<i>p</i> = 0.817). Intravenous lidocaine reduced abdominal pain scores and decreased the need for postoperative analgesics within 72 h after surgery. No significant differences were found in incisional and shoulder pain intensity, nausea and vomiting rates, or hospitalization duration between groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The infusion of lidocaine did not yield a reduction in the incidence or severity of PLSP in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"volume\":\"50 10\",\"pages\":\"1902-1908\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jog.16053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of intraoperative lidocaine on the prevention of postoperative shoulder pain in gynecologic laparoscopy: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Aim
To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative lidocaine in reducing the incidence of post-laparoscopic shoulder pain (PLSP) after gynecologic laparoscopy.
Methods
Patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the lidocaine group, receiving an initial intravenous dose of lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) before anesthesia induction, followed by a continuous infusion at 2 mg/kg/h, and the placebo group, receiving saline. The primary endpoint was the determination of PLSP incidence over a 72-h period post-surgery. Secondary endpoints included a comprehensive evaluation of pain intensity, as measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), for shoulder, abdominal, and incisional pain within a 72-hour period postoperatively. Additionally, the endpoints involved the assessment of Lofencodeine or Parexib Sodium usage frequency, incidence of nausea and vomiting, duration of anesthesia and surgical procedure, as well as the duration of hospital stay.
Results
Our study did not demonstrate any significant benefit in the incidence of PLSP during the postoperative period. PLSP occurred in 14 out of 41 patients (34.1%) in the lidocaine group, compared with 15 out of 41 patients (36.6%) in the placebo group (p = 0.817). Intravenous lidocaine reduced abdominal pain scores and decreased the need for postoperative analgesics within 72 h after surgery. No significant differences were found in incisional and shoulder pain intensity, nausea and vomiting rates, or hospitalization duration between groups.
Conclusions
The infusion of lidocaine did not yield a reduction in the incidence or severity of PLSP in patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research is the official Journal of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology and of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and aims to provide a medium for the publication of articles in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology.
The Journal publishes original research articles, case reports, review articles and letters to the editor. The Journal will give publication priority to original research articles over case reports. Accepted papers become the exclusive licence of the Journal. Manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two referees and/or Associate Editors expert in the field of the submitted paper.