使用DA-EPOCH-R与R-CHOP治疗DLBCL时初始肿瘤体积的影响:对alliance/CALGB 50303的二次分析。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753
Claire M Lanier, Niema B Razavian, Sydney Smith, Ralph B D'Agostino, Ryan T Hughes
{"title":"使用DA-EPOCH-R与R-CHOP治疗DLBCL时初始肿瘤体积的影响:对alliance/CALGB 50303的二次分析。","authors":"Claire M Lanier, Niema B Razavian, Sydney Smith, Ralph B D'Agostino, Ryan T Hughes","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.10-<i>p</i> = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R <i>vs.</i> R-CHOP: a secondary analysis of alliance/CALGB 50303.\",\"authors\":\"Claire M Lanier, Niema B Razavian, Sydney Smith, Ralph B D'Agostino, Ryan T Hughes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (<i>p</i> = 0.10-<i>p</i> = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2393753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于体积巨大的弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),理想的治疗模式仍不确定。我们通过Alliance/CALGB 50303研究了肿瘤体积对仅接受全身治疗的患者的影响。该试验的数据来自美国国立癌症研究所(National Cancer Institute)的NCTN/NCORP数据档案。该研究评估了结节部位的大小,并使用 Cox 比例危险模型估算了无进展生存期(PFS)。分层分析考虑了国际预后指数(IPI)风险评分。在 524 例患者中,155 例接受了治疗前扫描。以7.5厘米为界限,44%的患者被归类为体积过大。无论是连续测量,还是以>5或>7.5厘米为临界值测量,肿块对无进展生存期(PFS)的影响都不大(p = 0.10-p = 0.99)。按治疗组和 IPI 风险组进行的分层分析也不显著。在这项二次分析中,未发现体积与 PFS 之间存在显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of initial tumor bulk in DLBCL treated with DA-EPOCH-R vs. R-CHOP: a secondary analysis of alliance/CALGB 50303.

The ideal treatment paradigm for bulky diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remains uncertain. We investigated the impact of tumor bulk in patients treated with systemic therapy alone through Alliance/CALGB 50303. Data from this trial were obtained from the National Cancer Institute's NCTN/NCORP Data Archive. The study assessed the size of nodal sites and estimated progression-free survival (PFS) using Cox proportional hazards models. Stratified analysis factored in International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk scores. Out of 524 patients, 155 had pretreatment scans. Using a 7.5 cm cutoff, 44% were classified as bulky. Bulk did not significantly impact progression-free survival (PFS), whether measured continuously or at thresholds of >5 or >7.5 cm (p = 0.10-p = 0.99). Stratified analyses by treatment group and IPI risk group were also non-significant. In this secondary analysis, a significant association between bulk and PFS was not identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
期刊最新文献
Thromboprophylaxis with intermediate dose enoxaparin during asparaginase containing induction for young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Vaccination strategies for patients with lymphoma treated in early lines of therapies: a real-world practice survey among Fondazione Italiana Linfomi centers. The interplay of knowledge, motivation, and treatment response in medication adherence among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with Imatinib. CD274 structural variants for guiding treatment with PD-1 blockade in a patient with relapsed/refractory chronic active EBV transformed to NK lymphoma. A novel murine syngeneic CD8 peripheral T-cell lymphoma model with preclinical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1