将烟草的法定最低销售年龄提高到 20 岁以上与吸烟之间有什么关系?系统综述。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Nicotine & Tobacco Research Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntae206
Nathan Davies, Ilze Bogdanovica, Shaun McGill, Rachael L Murray
{"title":"将烟草的法定最低销售年龄提高到 20 岁以上与吸烟之间有什么关系?系统综述。","authors":"Nathan Davies, Ilze Bogdanovica, Shaun McGill, Rachael L Murray","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is considerable interest in raising the age of sale of tobacco above the conventional age of 18 years. We systematically reviewed whether raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco (MLSA) to 20 or above is associated with a reduced prevalence of smoking compared to an MLSA set at 18 or below.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Following a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42022347604), six databases of peer-reviewed journals were searched from January 2015 to April 2024. Backward and forward reference searching was conducted. Included studies assessed the association between MLSAs ≥20 with cigarette smoking or cigarette sales for those aged 11-20 years. Assessments on e-cigarettes were excluded. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted study data. We used ROBINS-I to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Findings were also synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were reviewed and 34 estimates of association were extracted. All extracted studies related to Tobacco 21 laws in the United States. Moderate quality evidence was found for reduced cigarette sales, moderate quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 18-20-year-olds, and low-quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 11-17-year-olds. The positive association was stronger for those with lower education. Study bias was variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is moderate quality evidence that Tobacco 21 can reduce overall cigarette sales and current cigarette smoking amongst those aged 18-20 years. It has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Research in settings other than the United States is required.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This systematic review on raising the minimum legal sale age of tobacco to 20 or above demonstrates there is moderate quality evidence that such laws reduce cigarette sales and moderate quality evidence they reduce smoking prevalence amongst those aged 18-20 years compared to a minimum legal sale age of 18 years or below. The research highlights potential benefits in reducing health inequalities, especially for individuals from lower educational backgrounds. Studies are limited to the United States, highlighting a need for more global research to assess the impact of these policies in other settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"369-377"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Davies, Ilze Bogdanovica, Shaun McGill, Rachael L Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ntr/ntae206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is considerable interest in raising the age of sale of tobacco above the conventional age of 18 years. We systematically reviewed whether raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco (MLSA) to 20 or above is associated with a reduced prevalence of smoking compared to an MLSA set at 18 or below.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>Following a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42022347604), six databases of peer-reviewed journals were searched from January 2015 to April 2024. Backward and forward reference searching was conducted. Included studies assessed the association between MLSAs ≥20 with cigarette smoking or cigarette sales for those aged 11-20 years. Assessments on e-cigarettes were excluded. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted study data. We used ROBINS-I to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Findings were also synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies were reviewed and 34 estimates of association were extracted. All extracted studies related to Tobacco 21 laws in the United States. Moderate quality evidence was found for reduced cigarette sales, moderate quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 18-20-year-olds, and low-quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 11-17-year-olds. The positive association was stronger for those with lower education. Study bias was variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is moderate quality evidence that Tobacco 21 can reduce overall cigarette sales and current cigarette smoking amongst those aged 18-20 years. It has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Research in settings other than the United States is required.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This systematic review on raising the minimum legal sale age of tobacco to 20 or above demonstrates there is moderate quality evidence that such laws reduce cigarette sales and moderate quality evidence they reduce smoking prevalence amongst those aged 18-20 years compared to a minimum legal sale age of 18 years or below. The research highlights potential benefits in reducing health inequalities, especially for individuals from lower educational backgrounds. Studies are limited to the United States, highlighting a need for more global research to assess the impact of these policies in other settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"369-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nicotine & Tobacco Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:人们对将烟草销售年龄提高到传统的 18 岁以上颇感兴趣。我们系统地研究了将烟草法定最低销售年龄提高到 20 岁或以上与将法定最低销售年龄设定在 18 岁或以下相比,是否会降低吸烟率:按照在 PROSPERO 上预先登记的方案(参考文献:CRD42022347604),检索了 2015 年 1 月至 2024 年 4 月期间的六个同行评审期刊数据库。进行了向前和向后的参考文献检索。纳入的研究评估了 11-20 岁人群中,MLSA ≥20 与吸烟或卷烟销售之间的关联。有关电子烟的评估被排除在外。一对审稿人独立提取研究数据。我们使用 ROBINS-I 评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 评估证据质量。结果:我们对 23 项研究进行了综述,并提取了 34 项关联估计值。所有提取的研究都与美国的 "烟草 21 "法律有关。在减少卷烟销售方面发现了中等质量的证据,在减少18-20岁青少年当前吸烟方面发现了中等质量的证据,在减少11-17岁青少年当前吸烟方面发现了低质量的证据。教育程度较低的人群与吸烟的正相关性更强。研究偏差不一:有中等质量的证据表明,"烟草 21 "可以减少 18-20 岁人群的总体卷烟销售量和当前吸烟量。它具有减少健康不平等的潜力。需要对美国以外的环境进行研究:这篇关于将烟草最低合法销售年龄提高到 20 岁或以上的系统综述表明,与最低合法销售年龄为 18 岁或以下相比,有中等质量的证据表明此类法律可减少卷烟销售,并可减少 18-20 岁人群的吸烟率。研究强调了减少健康不平等的潜在益处,尤其是对教育背景较低的个人。研究仅限于美国,因此需要开展更多全球性研究,以评估这些政策在其他环境中的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.

Introduction: There is considerable interest in raising the age of sale of tobacco above the conventional age of 18 years. We systematically reviewed whether raising the minimum legal sales age of tobacco (MLSA) to 20 or above is associated with a reduced prevalence of smoking compared to an MLSA set at 18 or below.

Aims and methods: Following a preregistered protocol on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42022347604), six databases of peer-reviewed journals were searched from January 2015 to April 2024. Backward and forward reference searching was conducted. Included studies assessed the association between MLSAs ≥20 with cigarette smoking or cigarette sales for those aged 11-20 years. Assessments on e-cigarettes were excluded. Pairs of reviewers independently extracted study data. We used ROBINS-I to assess the risk of bias and GRADE to assess the quality of evidence. Findings were also synthesized narratively.

Results: Twenty-three studies were reviewed and 34 estimates of association were extracted. All extracted studies related to Tobacco 21 laws in the United States. Moderate quality evidence was found for reduced cigarette sales, moderate quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 18-20-year-olds, and low-quality evidence was found for reduced current smoking for 11-17-year-olds. The positive association was stronger for those with lower education. Study bias was variable.

Conclusions: There is moderate quality evidence that Tobacco 21 can reduce overall cigarette sales and current cigarette smoking amongst those aged 18-20 years. It has the potential to reduce health inequalities. Research in settings other than the United States is required.

Implications: This systematic review on raising the minimum legal sale age of tobacco to 20 or above demonstrates there is moderate quality evidence that such laws reduce cigarette sales and moderate quality evidence they reduce smoking prevalence amongst those aged 18-20 years compared to a minimum legal sale age of 18 years or below. The research highlights potential benefits in reducing health inequalities, especially for individuals from lower educational backgrounds. Studies are limited to the United States, highlighting a need for more global research to assess the impact of these policies in other settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
期刊最新文献
Demographic trends in e-cigarette social media marketing: perceiving gender presentation and facial age via computer vision. Bidirectional relationships between sleep quality and nicotine vaping: studying young adult e-cigarette users in real time and real life. Evaluation of Dual Use: Real Time Reductions in Combustible Cigarette Smoking During Co-Occurring Use of E-Cigarettes A Secondary Analysis of a Naturalistic Randomized Clinical Trial. Psychological Distress is Associated with Blunt Use Among Youth in the US: Insights from the 2021-2023 National Youth Tobacco Surveys. The Influence of Perimenstrual Daily Ovarian Hormones on Anxiety and Cigarette Craving.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1