利用电子健康记录数据识别枪支伤害风险的机器学习预测模型。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae222
Hui Zhou, Claudia Nau, Fagen Xie, Richard Contreras, Deborah Ling Grant, Sonya Negriff, Margo Sidell, Corinna Koebnick, Rulin Hechter
{"title":"利用电子健康记录数据识别枪支伤害风险的机器学习预测模型。","authors":"Hui Zhou, Claudia Nau, Fagen Xie, Richard Contreras, Deborah Ling Grant, Sonya Negriff, Margo Sidell, Corinna Koebnick, Rulin Hechter","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Firearm injuries constitute a public health crisis. At the healthcare encounter level, they are, however, rare events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a predictive model to identify healthcare encounters of adult patients at increased risk of firearm injury to target screening and prevention efforts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic health records data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) were used to identify healthcare encounters of patients with fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries, as well as healthcare visits of a sample of matched controls during 2010-2018. More than 170 predictors, including diagnoses, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood characteristics were identified. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a split sample design were used to train and test a model that predicted risk of firearm injury within the next 3 years at the encounter level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3879 firearm injuries were identified among 5 288 529 KPSC adult members. Prevalence at the healthcare encounter level was 0.01%. The 15 most important predictors included demographics, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood-level socio-economic factors. The sensitivity and specificity of the final model were 0.83 and 0.56, respectively. A very high-risk group (top 1% of predicted risk) yielded a positive predictive value of 0.14% and sensitivity of 13%. This high-risk group potentially reduces screening burden by a factor of 11.7, compared to universal screening. Results for alternative probability cutoffs are presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our model can support more targeted screening in healthcare settings, resulting in improved efficiency of firearm injury risk assessment and prevention efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine-learning prediction model to identify risk of firearm injury using electronic health records data.\",\"authors\":\"Hui Zhou, Claudia Nau, Fagen Xie, Richard Contreras, Deborah Ling Grant, Sonya Negriff, Margo Sidell, Corinna Koebnick, Rulin Hechter\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocae222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Firearm injuries constitute a public health crisis. At the healthcare encounter level, they are, however, rare events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a predictive model to identify healthcare encounters of adult patients at increased risk of firearm injury to target screening and prevention efforts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Electronic health records data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) were used to identify healthcare encounters of patients with fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries, as well as healthcare visits of a sample of matched controls during 2010-2018. More than 170 predictors, including diagnoses, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood characteristics were identified. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a split sample design were used to train and test a model that predicted risk of firearm injury within the next 3 years at the encounter level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3879 firearm injuries were identified among 5 288 529 KPSC adult members. Prevalence at the healthcare encounter level was 0.01%. The 15 most important predictors included demographics, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood-level socio-economic factors. The sensitivity and specificity of the final model were 0.83 and 0.56, respectively. A very high-risk group (top 1% of predicted risk) yielded a positive predictive value of 0.14% and sensitivity of 13%. This high-risk group potentially reduces screening burden by a factor of 11.7, compared to universal screening. Results for alternative probability cutoffs are presented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our model can support more targeted screening in healthcare settings, resulting in improved efficiency of firearm injury risk assessment and prevention efforts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11413429/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:火器伤害是一个公共卫生危机。然而,在医疗保健层面,枪支伤害却是罕见事件:开发一个预测模型,以识别枪支伤害风险较高的成年患者的医疗就诊情况,从而有针对性地开展筛查和预防工作:使用南加州凯撒医疗集团(KPSC)的电子健康记录数据,识别 2010-2018 年间致命和非致命枪支伤害患者的医疗就诊情况,以及匹配对照样本的医疗就诊情况。研究确定了 170 多个预测因子,包括诊断、医疗保健利用率和邻里特征。研究人员使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)和分离样本设计来训练和测试一个模型,该模型可在就诊层面预测未来 3 年内发生枪支伤害的风险:在 5 288 529 名 KPSC 成年成员中,共发现了 3 879 起枪支伤害事件。医疗机构层面的发生率为 0.01%。15个最重要的预测因素包括人口统计学、医疗保健使用情况和邻里层面的社会经济因素。最终模型的灵敏度和特异度分别为 0.83 和 0.56。极高风险组(预测风险的前 1%)的阳性预测值为 0.14%,灵敏度为 13%。与普遍筛查相比,该高风险组可减少 11.7 倍的筛查负担。讨论:我们的模型可以支持在医疗机构中进行更有针对性的筛查,从而提高枪支伤害风险评估和预防工作的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A machine-learning prediction model to identify risk of firearm injury using electronic health records data.

Importance: Firearm injuries constitute a public health crisis. At the healthcare encounter level, they are, however, rare events.

Objective: To develop a predictive model to identify healthcare encounters of adult patients at increased risk of firearm injury to target screening and prevention efforts.

Materials and methods: Electronic health records data from Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) were used to identify healthcare encounters of patients with fatal and non-fatal firearm injuries, as well as healthcare visits of a sample of matched controls during 2010-2018. More than 170 predictors, including diagnoses, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood characteristics were identified. Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and a split sample design were used to train and test a model that predicted risk of firearm injury within the next 3 years at the encounter level.

Results: A total of 3879 firearm injuries were identified among 5 288 529 KPSC adult members. Prevalence at the healthcare encounter level was 0.01%. The 15 most important predictors included demographics, healthcare utilization, and neighborhood-level socio-economic factors. The sensitivity and specificity of the final model were 0.83 and 0.56, respectively. A very high-risk group (top 1% of predicted risk) yielded a positive predictive value of 0.14% and sensitivity of 13%. This high-risk group potentially reduces screening burden by a factor of 11.7, compared to universal screening. Results for alternative probability cutoffs are presented.

Discussion: Our model can support more targeted screening in healthcare settings, resulting in improved efficiency of firearm injury risk assessment and prevention efforts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
Trending in the right direction: critical access hospitals increased adoption of advanced electronic health record functions from 2018 to 2023. Evaluating gradient-based explanation methods for neural network ECG analysis using heatmaps. The role of routine and structured social needs data collection in improving care in US hospitals. Correction to: Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review. Is ChatGPT worthy enough for provisioning clinical decision support?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1