家庭外照料儿童与家庭和文化联系的权利:澳大利亚土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民以及非土著儿童的观点。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107009
Jemma Venables, Jenny Povey, Iryna Kolesnikova, Kate Thompson, Madonna Boman, Juli Richmond, Karen Healy, Janeen Baxter, Isobel Thwaite, Aariyana Hussain
{"title":"家庭外照料儿童与家庭和文化联系的权利:澳大利亚土著和/或托雷斯海峡岛民以及非土著儿童的观点。","authors":"Jemma Venables, Jenny Povey, Iryna Kolesnikova, Kate Thompson, Madonna Boman, Juli Richmond, Karen Healy, Janeen Baxter, Isobel Thwaite, Aariyana Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children have a right to participate in decisions about their lives. They also have the right to family and cultural connection, including when they are removed due to child protection concerns. However, the literature highlights barriers children in out-of-home care experience connecting to family-of-origin and culture. Moreover, this literature is predominantly from the perspective of practitioners and carers, with children's perspectives notably absent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This qualitative study addresses this gap by exploring Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children's perspectives and experiences of family and cultural connection while in out-of-home care. It seeks to uphold children's right to express their views on matters that impact their lives.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>The participants were 62 children aged 4-15 years (x̄=9 years), who were in out-of-home care in Queensland (Australia). Forty-two of the children were non-Indigenous and 20 identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lundy's (2007) model of participation guided the data collection approach. Art-based graphic-elicitation interviews were conducted. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children had differing levels of understanding as to why they could not reside with their family. Most children referred to a family-of-origin member not living with them as important in their lives, but it was not always their parent/s. Siblings were mentioned frequently. Barriers to connections with family included distance and cost of travel, parents not attending visits and being uncontactable, incarcerated or deceased. Whilst most children desired increased connection with family, a few wished for reduction or cessation. Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children showed varying levels of connection to culture with both siblings and carers playing key roles in enabling greater connection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Graphic-elicitation interviews provided an important opportunity for children to voice their experiences of and preferences regarding family and cultural connection. The inclusion of children's voices is needed to inform responsive policies and practices that safely support their rights to family and culture when in out-of-home care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":" ","pages":"107009"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children in out-of-home care's right to family and cultural connection: Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children's perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Jemma Venables, Jenny Povey, Iryna Kolesnikova, Kate Thompson, Madonna Boman, Juli Richmond, Karen Healy, Janeen Baxter, Isobel Thwaite, Aariyana Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children have a right to participate in decisions about their lives. They also have the right to family and cultural connection, including when they are removed due to child protection concerns. However, the literature highlights barriers children in out-of-home care experience connecting to family-of-origin and culture. Moreover, this literature is predominantly from the perspective of practitioners and carers, with children's perspectives notably absent.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This qualitative study addresses this gap by exploring Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children's perspectives and experiences of family and cultural connection while in out-of-home care. It seeks to uphold children's right to express their views on matters that impact their lives.</p><p><strong>Participants and setting: </strong>The participants were 62 children aged 4-15 years (x̄=9 years), who were in out-of-home care in Queensland (Australia). Forty-two of the children were non-Indigenous and 20 identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lundy's (2007) model of participation guided the data collection approach. Art-based graphic-elicitation interviews were conducted. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Children had differing levels of understanding as to why they could not reside with their family. Most children referred to a family-of-origin member not living with them as important in their lives, but it was not always their parent/s. Siblings were mentioned frequently. Barriers to connections with family included distance and cost of travel, parents not attending visits and being uncontactable, incarcerated or deceased. Whilst most children desired increased connection with family, a few wished for reduction or cessation. Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children showed varying levels of connection to culture with both siblings and carers playing key roles in enabling greater connection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Graphic-elicitation interviews provided an important opportunity for children to voice their experiences of and preferences regarding family and cultural connection. The inclusion of children's voices is needed to inform responsive policies and practices that safely support their rights to family and culture when in out-of-home care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107009\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:儿童有权参与有关其生活的决策。他们也有权与家庭和文化建立联系,包括因儿童保护问题而被带走时。然而,文献强调了家庭外照料的儿童在与原生家庭和文化联系方面遇到的障碍。此外,这些文献主要是从从业人员和照护者的角度出发,儿童的视角明显缺失:本定性研究通过探讨澳大利亚原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民以及非原住民儿童在接受家庭外照料时对家庭和文化联系的看法和体验,填补了这一空白。它旨在维护儿童就影响其生活的问题发表意见的权利:参与者为澳大利亚昆士兰州 62 名接受家庭外照料的 4-15 岁儿童(x̄=9 岁)。其中 42 名儿童为非土著儿童,20 名儿童被认定为土著儿童和/或托雷斯海峡岛民儿童:Lundy 的参与模式(2007 年)指导了数据收集方法。进行了以艺术为基础的图形启发式访谈。对逐字记录稿进行了专题分析:儿童对不能与家人同住的原因有不同程度的理解。大多数儿童都提到不与他们同住的原生家庭成员对他们的生活很重要,但并不总是他们的父母。兄弟姐妹也经常被提及。与家人联系的障碍包括距离和旅行费用、父母不参加探访、无法联系、被监禁或去世。虽然大多数儿童希望加强与家人的联系,但也有少数儿童希望减少或停止与家人的联系。原住民和/或托雷斯海峡岛民儿童表现出不同程度的文化联系,兄弟姐妹和照顾者在加强联系方面发挥了关键作用:图解启发式访谈为儿童提供了一个重要的机会,让他们表达自己对家庭和文化联系的体验和偏好。有必要将儿童的声音纳入其中,以便为有针对性的政策和实践提供信息,从而在家庭外照料时安全地支持儿童的家庭和文化权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Children in out-of-home care's right to family and cultural connection: Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children's perspectives.

Background: Children have a right to participate in decisions about their lives. They also have the right to family and cultural connection, including when they are removed due to child protection concerns. However, the literature highlights barriers children in out-of-home care experience connecting to family-of-origin and culture. Moreover, this literature is predominantly from the perspective of practitioners and carers, with children's perspectives notably absent.

Objective: This qualitative study addresses this gap by exploring Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous Australian children's perspectives and experiences of family and cultural connection while in out-of-home care. It seeks to uphold children's right to express their views on matters that impact their lives.

Participants and setting: The participants were 62 children aged 4-15 years (x̄=9 years), who were in out-of-home care in Queensland (Australia). Forty-two of the children were non-Indigenous and 20 identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children.

Methods: Lundy's (2007) model of participation guided the data collection approach. Art-based graphic-elicitation interviews were conducted. Verbatim transcripts were analysed thematically.

Results: Children had differing levels of understanding as to why they could not reside with their family. Most children referred to a family-of-origin member not living with them as important in their lives, but it was not always their parent/s. Siblings were mentioned frequently. Barriers to connections with family included distance and cost of travel, parents not attending visits and being uncontactable, incarcerated or deceased. Whilst most children desired increased connection with family, a few wished for reduction or cessation. Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children showed varying levels of connection to culture with both siblings and carers playing key roles in enabling greater connection.

Conclusions: Graphic-elicitation interviews provided an important opportunity for children to voice their experiences of and preferences regarding family and cultural connection. The inclusion of children's voices is needed to inform responsive policies and practices that safely support their rights to family and culture when in out-of-home care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Intracranial findings associated with low odds of retinal hemorrhage among children under 2 years of age at a single pediatric trauma center. Exposure to family violence and school violence among Palestinian high schoolers: The moderating effect of gender and school climate. Children exposed to sibling sexual abuse: Sociodemographic and trauma symptom differences. Attachment & biobehavioral catch-up participation & reunification in a family treatment court. How youth of color with mental disabilities are excluded from school: A DisCrit and logistic regression analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1