评估和比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者使用彩色显微切割针、手术刀片和切割电烧进行颈部切开术的效果:一项前瞻性研究。

National journal of maxillofacial surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_194_22
Priyatam Mishra, Nitin Bhola, Anchal Agarwal, Mrinalini Mathur, Saurabh Pillai, Raj K Chakraborty, Shubhanshi Kangloo
{"title":"评估和比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者使用彩色显微切割针、手术刀片和切割电烧进行颈部切开术的效果:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Priyatam Mishra, Nitin Bhola, Anchal Agarwal, Mrinalini Mathur, Saurabh Pillai, Raj K Chakraborty, Shubhanshi Kangloo","doi":"10.4103/njms.njms_194_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incisions taken by Colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized control, comparative study was carried out on 21 patients. These patients were divided into 3 groups containing 7 patients in each group. The intra operative and post operative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics using Chisquare test, Fisher's Exact Test, one way ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey Test and software used in the analysis were SPSS 27.0 version and GraphPad Prism 7.0 version and <i>P</i> < 0.05 is considered as level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time taken for placing cutaneous skin incision and blood loss was more in the surgical blade group as compared to the Colorado microdissection needle and electrocautery. Statistically no significant difference between the three group while comparing the cutaneous neck incision healing and post operative scar formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proves the superiority of the Colorado microdissection needle in terms of time taken and blood loss with similar aesthetic outcome in terms of cutaneous wound healing and post operative scar formation when compared to surgical blade and cutting electrocautery.</p>","PeriodicalId":101444,"journal":{"name":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incision taken by colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Priyatam Mishra, Nitin Bhola, Anchal Agarwal, Mrinalini Mathur, Saurabh Pillai, Raj K Chakraborty, Shubhanshi Kangloo\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/njms.njms_194_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incisions taken by Colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A prospective, randomized control, comparative study was carried out on 21 patients. These patients were divided into 3 groups containing 7 patients in each group. The intra operative and post operative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics using Chisquare test, Fisher's Exact Test, one way ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey Test and software used in the analysis were SPSS 27.0 version and GraphPad Prism 7.0 version and <i>P</i> < 0.05 is considered as level of significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time taken for placing cutaneous skin incision and blood loss was more in the surgical blade group as compared to the Colorado microdissection needle and electrocautery. Statistically no significant difference between the three group while comparing the cutaneous neck incision healing and post operative scar formation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proves the superiority of the Colorado microdissection needle in terms of time taken and blood loss with similar aesthetic outcome in terms of cutaneous wound healing and post operative scar formation when compared to surgical blade and cutting electrocautery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National journal of maxillofacial surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_194_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of maxillofacial surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.njms_194_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估和比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者采用科罗拉多显微解剖针、手术刀片和切割电烧进行颈部皮肤解剖切口的效果:对 21 名患者进行了前瞻性随机对照比较研究。这些患者被分为 3 组,每组 7 人。对术中和术后结果进行了评估。统计分析采用描述性和推论性统计方法,使用了Chisquare检验、Fisher's Exact检验、单向方差分析和多重比较Tukey检验,分析中使用的软件是SPSS 27.0版和GraphPad Prism 7.0版,P<0.05为显著性水平:与科罗拉多显微切割针和电烙术相比,手术刀组切开皮肤所需的时间和失血量更多。在颈部皮肤切口愈合和术后疤痕形成方面,三组之间的差异无统计学意义:本研究证明,与手术刀片和切割电烧相比,科罗拉多微分割针在耗时和失血方面更具优势,在皮肤伤口愈合和术后疤痕形成方面具有相似的美学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incision taken by colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study.

Aim: To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incisions taken by Colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Materials and methods: A prospective, randomized control, comparative study was carried out on 21 patients. These patients were divided into 3 groups containing 7 patients in each group. The intra operative and post operative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics using Chisquare test, Fisher's Exact Test, one way ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey Test and software used in the analysis were SPSS 27.0 version and GraphPad Prism 7.0 version and P < 0.05 is considered as level of significance.

Results: The time taken for placing cutaneous skin incision and blood loss was more in the surgical blade group as compared to the Colorado microdissection needle and electrocautery. Statistically no significant difference between the three group while comparing the cutaneous neck incision healing and post operative scar formation.

Conclusion: This study proves the superiority of the Colorado microdissection needle in terms of time taken and blood loss with similar aesthetic outcome in terms of cutaneous wound healing and post operative scar formation when compared to surgical blade and cutting electrocautery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Patterns and characteristics of maxillofacial trauma among children and adolescents: A Bi-institutional retrospective study. Presence of antilingula and its relationship to mandibular foramen-An anatomical study. Primary non-radiation induced angiosarcoma of the parotid with epithelioid morphology. Radiation effects in head and neck and role of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: An adjunct to management. The surgical outcome of sutureless skin closures using Octyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond™) versus Steri-Strip™.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1