Katrin Bisterfeld , Marie-Kristin Raulf , Andrea Springer , Johannes Lang , Michael Lierz , Christina Strube , Ursula Siebert
{"title":"德国欧洲野猫(Felis silvestris)的体外寄生虫","authors":"Katrin Bisterfeld , Marie-Kristin Raulf , Andrea Springer , Johannes Lang , Michael Lierz , Christina Strube , Ursula Siebert","doi":"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.100977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the impact of parasites on wildlife populations is an important aspect of conservation management. However, research on ectoparasites in wildlife can be difficult, as examinations of live animals which are not habituated to human handling are often impossible. The European wildcat (<em>Felis silvestris</em>) is a strictly protected wildlife species whose population has been recovering in Germany in recent decades. Several studies from different European countries have investigated the parasitological status of European wildcat populations. However, most of these studies assessed endoparasite infections, whereas ectoparasite infestations have often been neglected. To fill this knowledge gap for wildcats in Germany, 131 dead found specimens were examined for ectoparasites by macroscopic and microscopic examination of the fur and the ear canals. Infestation with ectoparasites was present in 84.0% (110/131) of the wildcats. Ticks showed the highest prevalence with 72.5% (95/131) of wildcats infested, with 49.6% (65/131) infested with <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> and 36.6% (48/131) with <em>Ixodes hexagonus</em>/<em>canisuga</em>. A total of 27.5% (36/131) of the wildcats were positive for at least one flea species. Of the nine different flea species identified by morphology and/or molecular analyses, Ceratophyllidae were most common (16.8% [22/131]), with <em>Ceratophyllus sciurorum</em> confirmed on 12.2% (16/131) and <em>Nosopsyllus fasciatus</em> on 1.5% (2/131) animals, followed by <em>Pulex irritans</em> (5.3% [7/131]), <em>Spilopsyllus cuniculi</em> (3.8% [5/131]), <em>Chaetopsylla</em> spp. (3.1% [4/131]) (2/131 <em>Chaetopsylla trichosa</em> and 1/131 <em>Chaetopsylla globiceps</em>), <em>Ctenocephalides felis</em> (1.5% [2/131]), <em>Archaeopsylla erinacei</em> (1.5% [2/131]) and <em>Ctenophthalmus baeticus</em> (0.8% [1/131]). Further, 23.7% (31/131) of the wildcats harboured mites, identified as <em>Trombicula autumnalis</em> in 12.2% (16/131) and <em>Otodectes cynotis</em> in 4.8% (6/124) of cases. The only louse species detected was <em>Felicola hercynianus</em> with a prevalence of 2.3% (3/131). Infestation intensities ranged from 1 to 86 ticks, 1–49 fleas, 1–1896 mites, and 1–92 <em>F. hercynianus</em> per wildcat. This study demonstrates that a variety of ectoparasites infests wildcats in Germany, but they do not seem to have a serious impact on the general health of wildcats, as judged by the hosts' mostly good or very good nutritional condition. In addition, the potential risk to domestic cats (<em>Felis catus</em>) and humans posed by the wildcats’ ectoparasites, appears to be low but present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54278,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 100977"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424000737/pdfft?md5=ef8ab052c75594513213c919a6fb3b0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2213224424000737-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ectoparasites of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Bisterfeld , Marie-Kristin Raulf , Andrea Springer , Johannes Lang , Michael Lierz , Christina Strube , Ursula Siebert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijppaw.2024.100977\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding the impact of parasites on wildlife populations is an important aspect of conservation management. However, research on ectoparasites in wildlife can be difficult, as examinations of live animals which are not habituated to human handling are often impossible. The European wildcat (<em>Felis silvestris</em>) is a strictly protected wildlife species whose population has been recovering in Germany in recent decades. Several studies from different European countries have investigated the parasitological status of European wildcat populations. However, most of these studies assessed endoparasite infections, whereas ectoparasite infestations have often been neglected. To fill this knowledge gap for wildcats in Germany, 131 dead found specimens were examined for ectoparasites by macroscopic and microscopic examination of the fur and the ear canals. Infestation with ectoparasites was present in 84.0% (110/131) of the wildcats. Ticks showed the highest prevalence with 72.5% (95/131) of wildcats infested, with 49.6% (65/131) infested with <em>Ixodes ricinus</em> and 36.6% (48/131) with <em>Ixodes hexagonus</em>/<em>canisuga</em>. A total of 27.5% (36/131) of the wildcats were positive for at least one flea species. Of the nine different flea species identified by morphology and/or molecular analyses, Ceratophyllidae were most common (16.8% [22/131]), with <em>Ceratophyllus sciurorum</em> confirmed on 12.2% (16/131) and <em>Nosopsyllus fasciatus</em> on 1.5% (2/131) animals, followed by <em>Pulex irritans</em> (5.3% [7/131]), <em>Spilopsyllus cuniculi</em> (3.8% [5/131]), <em>Chaetopsylla</em> spp. (3.1% [4/131]) (2/131 <em>Chaetopsylla trichosa</em> and 1/131 <em>Chaetopsylla globiceps</em>), <em>Ctenocephalides felis</em> (1.5% [2/131]), <em>Archaeopsylla erinacei</em> (1.5% [2/131]) and <em>Ctenophthalmus baeticus</em> (0.8% [1/131]). Further, 23.7% (31/131) of the wildcats harboured mites, identified as <em>Trombicula autumnalis</em> in 12.2% (16/131) and <em>Otodectes cynotis</em> in 4.8% (6/124) of cases. The only louse species detected was <em>Felicola hercynianus</em> with a prevalence of 2.3% (3/131). Infestation intensities ranged from 1 to 86 ticks, 1–49 fleas, 1–1896 mites, and 1–92 <em>F. hercynianus</em> per wildcat. This study demonstrates that a variety of ectoparasites infests wildcats in Germany, but they do not seem to have a serious impact on the general health of wildcats, as judged by the hosts' mostly good or very good nutritional condition. In addition, the potential risk to domestic cats (<em>Felis catus</em>) and humans posed by the wildcats’ ectoparasites, appears to be low but present.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife\",\"volume\":\"25 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424000737/pdfft?md5=ef8ab052c75594513213c919a6fb3b0e&pid=1-s2.0-S2213224424000737-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424000737\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Parasitology-Parasites and Wildlife","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213224424000737","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ectoparasites of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Germany
Understanding the impact of parasites on wildlife populations is an important aspect of conservation management. However, research on ectoparasites in wildlife can be difficult, as examinations of live animals which are not habituated to human handling are often impossible. The European wildcat (Felis silvestris) is a strictly protected wildlife species whose population has been recovering in Germany in recent decades. Several studies from different European countries have investigated the parasitological status of European wildcat populations. However, most of these studies assessed endoparasite infections, whereas ectoparasite infestations have often been neglected. To fill this knowledge gap for wildcats in Germany, 131 dead found specimens were examined for ectoparasites by macroscopic and microscopic examination of the fur and the ear canals. Infestation with ectoparasites was present in 84.0% (110/131) of the wildcats. Ticks showed the highest prevalence with 72.5% (95/131) of wildcats infested, with 49.6% (65/131) infested with Ixodes ricinus and 36.6% (48/131) with Ixodes hexagonus/canisuga. A total of 27.5% (36/131) of the wildcats were positive for at least one flea species. Of the nine different flea species identified by morphology and/or molecular analyses, Ceratophyllidae were most common (16.8% [22/131]), with Ceratophyllus sciurorum confirmed on 12.2% (16/131) and Nosopsyllus fasciatus on 1.5% (2/131) animals, followed by Pulex irritans (5.3% [7/131]), Spilopsyllus cuniculi (3.8% [5/131]), Chaetopsylla spp. (3.1% [4/131]) (2/131 Chaetopsylla trichosa and 1/131 Chaetopsylla globiceps), Ctenocephalides felis (1.5% [2/131]), Archaeopsylla erinacei (1.5% [2/131]) and Ctenophthalmus baeticus (0.8% [1/131]). Further, 23.7% (31/131) of the wildcats harboured mites, identified as Trombicula autumnalis in 12.2% (16/131) and Otodectes cynotis in 4.8% (6/124) of cases. The only louse species detected was Felicola hercynianus with a prevalence of 2.3% (3/131). Infestation intensities ranged from 1 to 86 ticks, 1–49 fleas, 1–1896 mites, and 1–92 F. hercynianus per wildcat. This study demonstrates that a variety of ectoparasites infests wildcats in Germany, but they do not seem to have a serious impact on the general health of wildcats, as judged by the hosts' mostly good or very good nutritional condition. In addition, the potential risk to domestic cats (Felis catus) and humans posed by the wildcats’ ectoparasites, appears to be low but present.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife (IJP-PAW) publishes the results of original research on parasites of all wildlife, invertebrate and vertebrate. This includes free-ranging, wild populations, as well as captive wildlife, semi-domesticated species (e.g. reindeer) and farmed populations of recently domesticated or wild-captured species (e.g. cultured fishes). Articles on all aspects of wildlife parasitology are welcomed including taxonomy, biodiversity and distribution, ecology and epidemiology, population biology and host-parasite relationships. The impact of parasites on the health and conservation of wildlife is seen as an important area covered by the journal especially the potential role of environmental factors, for example climate. Also important to the journal is ''one health'' and the nature of interactions between wildlife, people and domestic animals, including disease emergence and zoonoses.