闭环供应链中的融资和在线回收渠道决策

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101414
Ting Tang , Haiyan Xu , Zhichao Zhang , Kebing Chen
{"title":"闭环供应链中的融资和在线回收渠道决策","authors":"Ting Tang ,&nbsp;Haiyan Xu ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhang ,&nbsp;Kebing Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the context of “Internet + recycling”, remanufacturing enterprises<span> seek cooperation with recycling platforms to develop online recycling channels. Given that many manufacturers have capital constraints in the recycling and production process, we consider bank and recycling platform to provide financial assistance to the manufacturer. This paper constructs a Stackelberg game model under bank financing and recycling platform financing based on two forms of online recycling cooperation: entrusted recycling and direct recycling. Through the comparison of equilibrium profits, the participants’ financing and recycling channel preferences are explored. The results show that the recycling platform is willing to provide financing service for the manufacturer with a larger capital gap, but there are feasibility conditions for the setting of its loan interest rate. The manufacturer with less initial capital tends to choose the financing scheme with a relatively low interest rate, while the reduction of capital gap increases the propensity for bank financing. The lower platform commission prompts the manufacturer to implement direct recycling, and the increase in cost saving rate of remanufacturing and platform interest rate makes the superiority of direct recycling even more significant. However, entrusted recycling is always more profitable for the recycling platform regardless of the financing scheme. Furthermore, differentiated product sales and portfolio financing can have a certain impact on the manufacturer’s financing and recycling decisions.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 101414"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financing and online recycling channel decisions in a closed-loop supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Ting Tang ,&nbsp;Haiyan Xu ,&nbsp;Zhichao Zhang ,&nbsp;Kebing Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elerap.2024.101414\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the context of “Internet + recycling”, remanufacturing enterprises<span> seek cooperation with recycling platforms to develop online recycling channels. Given that many manufacturers have capital constraints in the recycling and production process, we consider bank and recycling platform to provide financial assistance to the manufacturer. This paper constructs a Stackelberg game model under bank financing and recycling platform financing based on two forms of online recycling cooperation: entrusted recycling and direct recycling. Through the comparison of equilibrium profits, the participants’ financing and recycling channel preferences are explored. The results show that the recycling platform is willing to provide financing service for the manufacturer with a larger capital gap, but there are feasibility conditions for the setting of its loan interest rate. The manufacturer with less initial capital tends to choose the financing scheme with a relatively low interest rate, while the reduction of capital gap increases the propensity for bank financing. The lower platform commission prompts the manufacturer to implement direct recycling, and the increase in cost saving rate of remanufacturing and platform interest rate makes the superiority of direct recycling even more significant. However, entrusted recycling is always more profitable for the recycling platform regardless of the financing scheme. Furthermore, differentiated product sales and portfolio financing can have a certain impact on the manufacturer’s financing and recycling decisions.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422324000590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 "互联网+回收 "的背景下,再制造企业寻求与回收平台合作,开拓线上回收渠道。鉴于许多制造商在回收生产过程中存在资金约束,我们考虑由银行和回收平台为制造商提供资金援助。本文基于委托回收和直接回收两种在线回收合作形式,构建了银行融资和回收平台融资下的斯塔克尔伯格博弈模型。通过均衡收益的比较,探讨了参与者的融资偏好和回收渠道偏好。结果表明,回收平台愿意为资金缺口较大的制造商提供融资服务,但其贷款利率的设定存在可行性条件。初始资金较少的制造商倾向于选择利率相对较低的融资方案,而资金缺口的缩小则增加了银行融资的倾向。较低的平台佣金促使制造商实施直接回收,而再制造成本节约率和平台利率的提高使得直接回收的优越性更加显著。然而,无论采用哪种融资方案,委托回收对回收平台来说总是更有利可图。此外,差异化的产品销售和组合融资也会对制造商的融资和回收决策产生一定影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Financing and online recycling channel decisions in a closed-loop supply chain

In the context of “Internet + recycling”, remanufacturing enterprises seek cooperation with recycling platforms to develop online recycling channels. Given that many manufacturers have capital constraints in the recycling and production process, we consider bank and recycling platform to provide financial assistance to the manufacturer. This paper constructs a Stackelberg game model under bank financing and recycling platform financing based on two forms of online recycling cooperation: entrusted recycling and direct recycling. Through the comparison of equilibrium profits, the participants’ financing and recycling channel preferences are explored. The results show that the recycling platform is willing to provide financing service for the manufacturer with a larger capital gap, but there are feasibility conditions for the setting of its loan interest rate. The manufacturer with less initial capital tends to choose the financing scheme with a relatively low interest rate, while the reduction of capital gap increases the propensity for bank financing. The lower platform commission prompts the manufacturer to implement direct recycling, and the increase in cost saving rate of remanufacturing and platform interest rate makes the superiority of direct recycling even more significant. However, entrusted recycling is always more profitable for the recycling platform regardless of the financing scheme. Furthermore, differentiated product sales and portfolio financing can have a certain impact on the manufacturer’s financing and recycling decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1