双层优化问题的δ扰动:误差边界分析

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2024.100315
Margarita Antoniou , Ankur Sinha , Gregor Papa
{"title":"双层优化问题的δ扰动:误差边界分析","authors":"Margarita Antoniou ,&nbsp;Ankur Sinha ,&nbsp;Gregor Papa","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2024.100315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we analyze a perturbed formulation of bilevel optimization problems, which we refer to as <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation. The <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation allows to handle the lower level optimization problem efficiently when there are multiple lower level optimal solutions. By using an appropriate perturbation strategy for the optimistic or pessimistic formulation, one can ensure that the optimization problem at the lower level contains only a single (approximate) optimal solution for any given decision at the upper level. The optimistic or the pessimistic bilevel optimal solution can then be efficiently searched for by algorithms that rely on solving the lower level optimization problem multiple times during the solution search procedure. The <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation is arrived at by adding the upper level objective function to the lower level objective function after multiplying the upper level objective by a small positive/negative <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>. We provide a proof that the <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation is approximately equivalent to the original optimistic or pessimistic formulation and give an error bound for the approximation. We apply this scheme to a class of algorithms that attempts to solve optimistic and pessimistic variants of bilevel optimization problems by repeatedly solving the lower level optimization problem.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100315"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000198/pdfft?md5=0f5d3b645bfc42cde11aa2cafd027512&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716024000198-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis\",\"authors\":\"Margarita Antoniou ,&nbsp;Ankur Sinha ,&nbsp;Gregor Papa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orp.2024.100315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we analyze a perturbed formulation of bilevel optimization problems, which we refer to as <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation. The <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation allows to handle the lower level optimization problem efficiently when there are multiple lower level optimal solutions. By using an appropriate perturbation strategy for the optimistic or pessimistic formulation, one can ensure that the optimization problem at the lower level contains only a single (approximate) optimal solution for any given decision at the upper level. The optimistic or the pessimistic bilevel optimal solution can then be efficiently searched for by algorithms that rely on solving the lower level optimization problem multiple times during the solution search procedure. The <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation is arrived at by adding the upper level objective function to the lower level objective function after multiplying the upper level objective by a small positive/negative <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>. We provide a proof that the <span><math><mi>δ</mi></math></span>-perturbed formulation is approximately equivalent to the original optimistic or pessimistic formulation and give an error bound for the approximation. We apply this scheme to a class of algorithms that attempts to solve optimistic and pessimistic variants of bilevel optimization problems by repeatedly solving the lower level optimization problem.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000198/pdfft?md5=0f5d3b645bfc42cde11aa2cafd027512&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716024000198-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716024000198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了双层优化问题的扰动表述,我们称之为 δ-perturbed 表述。当存在多个低层最优解时,δ-扰动公式可以有效地处理低层优化问题。通过对乐观表述或悲观表述采用适当的扰动策略,可以确保下层优化问题对于上层的任何给定决策只包含一个(近似)最优解。乐观或悲观的双层最优解就可以通过算法高效地搜索到,而这些算法依赖于在解搜索过程中多次求解下层优化问题。将上层目标乘以较小的正/负 δ 后,将上层目标函数与下层目标函数相加,就得到了 δ 扰动公式。我们证明δ扰动公式近似等价于原始的乐观或悲观公式,并给出了近似公式的误差范围。我们将这一方案应用于一类算法,该算法试图通过重复求解低级优化问题来求解双级优化问题的乐观和悲观变体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis

In this paper, we analyze a perturbed formulation of bilevel optimization problems, which we refer to as δ-perturbed formulation. The δ-perturbed formulation allows to handle the lower level optimization problem efficiently when there are multiple lower level optimal solutions. By using an appropriate perturbation strategy for the optimistic or pessimistic formulation, one can ensure that the optimization problem at the lower level contains only a single (approximate) optimal solution for any given decision at the upper level. The optimistic or the pessimistic bilevel optimal solution can then be efficiently searched for by algorithms that rely on solving the lower level optimization problem multiple times during the solution search procedure. The δ-perturbed formulation is arrived at by adding the upper level objective function to the lower level objective function after multiplying the upper level objective by a small positive/negative δ. We provide a proof that the δ-perturbed formulation is approximately equivalent to the original optimistic or pessimistic formulation and give an error bound for the approximation. We apply this scheme to a class of algorithms that attempts to solve optimistic and pessimistic variants of bilevel optimization problems by repeatedly solving the lower level optimization problem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system Distributional robustness based on Wasserstein-metric approach for humanitarian logistics problem under road disruptions A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Competitive pricing and seed node selection in a two-echelon supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1