预测未来阿尔茨海默病个体风险的新评分:ADNI队列纵向研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's Disease Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/JAD-240532
Hongxiu Guo, Shangqi Sun, Yang Yang, Rong Ma, Cailin Wang, Siyi Zheng, Xiufeng Wang, Gang Li
{"title":"预测未来阿尔茨海默病个体风险的新评分:ADNI队列纵向研究。","authors":"Hongxiu Guo, Shangqi Sun, Yang Yang, Rong Ma, Cailin Wang, Siyi Zheng, Xiufeng Wang, Gang Li","doi":"10.3233/JAD-240532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying high-risk individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are likely to progress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a novel clinical score for personalized estimation of MCI-to-AD conversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study were analyzed. Two-thirds of the MCI patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 478), and the remaining one-third formed the validation cohort (n = 239). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with MCI-to-AD progression within 4 years. A prediction score was developed based on the regression coefficients derived from the logistic model and tested in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lipidomics-signature was obtained that showed a significant association with disease progression. The MCI conversion scoring system (ranged from 0 to 14 points), consisting of the lipidomics-signature and five other significant variables (Apolipoprotein ɛ4, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and delayed recall, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale delayed recall test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, and cortical thickness of the AD signature), was constructed. Higher conversion scores were associated with a higher proportion of patients converting to AD. The scoring system demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.879, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.597) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.915, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.991). The risk classification achieved excellent sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MCI-to-AD conversion score is a reliable tool for predicting the risk of disease progression in individuals with MCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Score to Predict Individual Risk for Future Alzheimer's Disease: A Longitudinal Study of the ADNI Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Hongxiu Guo, Shangqi Sun, Yang Yang, Rong Ma, Cailin Wang, Siyi Zheng, Xiufeng Wang, Gang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/JAD-240532\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying high-risk individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are likely to progress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and validate a novel clinical score for personalized estimation of MCI-to-AD conversion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study were analyzed. Two-thirds of the MCI patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 478), and the remaining one-third formed the validation cohort (n = 239). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with MCI-to-AD progression within 4 years. A prediction score was developed based on the regression coefficients derived from the logistic model and tested in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A lipidomics-signature was obtained that showed a significant association with disease progression. The MCI conversion scoring system (ranged from 0 to 14 points), consisting of the lipidomics-signature and five other significant variables (Apolipoprotein ɛ4, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and delayed recall, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale delayed recall test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, and cortical thickness of the AD signature), was constructed. Higher conversion scores were associated with a higher proportion of patients converting to AD. The scoring system demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.879, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.597) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.915, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.991). The risk classification achieved excellent sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MCI-to-AD conversion score is a reliable tool for predicting the risk of disease progression in individuals with MCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-240532\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-240532","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:识别可能发展为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的轻度认知障碍(MCI)高危患者对早期干预至关重要:识别可能发展为阿尔茨海默病(AD)的轻度认知障碍(MCI)高危患者对于早期干预至关重要:本研究旨在开发并验证一种新型临床评分方法,用于个性化评估 MCI 向 AD 的转化:方法:分析了阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)研究的数据。三分之二的MCI患者被随机分配到训练队列(n = 478),其余三分之一组成验证队列(n = 239)。研究人员进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定 4 年内 MCI 向AD 发展的相关因素。根据逻辑模型得出的回归系数制定了预测评分,并在验证队列中进行了测试:结果:得出的脂质组学特征与疾病进展有显著关联。由脂质组学特征和其他五个重要变量(载脂蛋白ɛ4、Rey听觉言语学习测试即时和延迟回忆、阿尔茨海默病评估量表延迟回忆测试、功能活动问卷和AD特征皮层厚度)组成的MCI转换评分系统(从0分到14分不等)被构建出来。转换得分越高,转换为 AD 的患者比例越高。该评分系统在训练队列(AUC = 0.879,Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 p = 0.597)和验证队列(AUC = 0.915,Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验 p = 0.991)中均表现出良好的区分度和校准性。风险分类的灵敏度(0.84)和特异性(0.75)都很高:MCI-AD转换评分是预测MCI患者疾病进展风险的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Score to Predict Individual Risk for Future Alzheimer's Disease: A Longitudinal Study of the ADNI Cohort.

Background: Identifying high-risk individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) who are likely to progress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is crucial for early intervention.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a novel clinical score for personalized estimation of MCI-to-AD conversion.

Methods: The data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study were analyzed. Two-thirds of the MCI patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n = 478), and the remaining one-third formed the validation cohort (n = 239). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with MCI-to-AD progression within 4 years. A prediction score was developed based on the regression coefficients derived from the logistic model and tested in the validation cohort.

Results: A lipidomics-signature was obtained that showed a significant association with disease progression. The MCI conversion scoring system (ranged from 0 to 14 points), consisting of the lipidomics-signature and five other significant variables (Apolipoprotein ɛ4, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test immediate and delayed recall, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale delayed recall test, Functional Activities Questionnaire, and cortical thickness of the AD signature), was constructed. Higher conversion scores were associated with a higher proportion of patients converting to AD. The scoring system demonstrated good discrimination and calibration in both the training cohort (AUC = 0.879, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.597) and the validation cohort (AUC = 0.915, p of Hosmer-Lemeshow test = 0.991). The risk classification achieved excellent sensitivity (0.84) and specificity (0.75).

Conclusions: The MCI-to-AD conversion score is a reliable tool for predicting the risk of disease progression in individuals with MCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
期刊最新文献
Assessing palliative care needs in patients with dementia: A cross-sectional analysis of an predominantly oldest-old population from a geriatric memory clinic. Tri-culture modeling of neuroinflammation, neurodegeneration, and neuroprotection. Real-world assessment of caregiver preference and compliance to treatment with twice-weekly versus daily rivastigmine patches in Alzheimer's disease. A call for globally responsive screening materials to account for heterogeneity in dementia syndromes. Primary cortical cell tri-culture to study effects of amyloid-β on microglia function and neuroinflammatory response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1