{"title":"图像视觉的多样性","authors":"Jan Koenderink, Andrea van Doorn, Johan Wagemans","doi":"10.1177/20416695241267371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pictorial awareness is addressed through experimental phenomenology involving over 90 naïve participants. Since one can't look at the \"same\" picture twice the study uses one-shot trials. The participant's fascination for the duration of a session is held through the artistic principle of theme and variation. Six variations focus on the theme of pictorial geometry, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Major findings are: Idiosyncratic deviations from veridical are huge as compared to common textbook \"effects.\" Observers wield arbitrary heuristics for tasks that are \"formally related.\" The assumption of a common formal framework is apparently unsound. The notion of \"inverse optics\" is misleading. A fair fraction of the population appears to lack monocular stereopsis as intuitive awareness. It suggests an as-yet unrecognized, but perhaps common variety of aphantasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"15 5","pages":"20416695241267371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Varieties of pictorial vision.\",\"authors\":\"Jan Koenderink, Andrea van Doorn, Johan Wagemans\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20416695241267371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pictorial awareness is addressed through experimental phenomenology involving over 90 naïve participants. Since one can't look at the \\\"same\\\" picture twice the study uses one-shot trials. The participant's fascination for the duration of a session is held through the artistic principle of theme and variation. Six variations focus on the theme of pictorial geometry, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Major findings are: Idiosyncratic deviations from veridical are huge as compared to common textbook \\\"effects.\\\" Observers wield arbitrary heuristics for tasks that are \\\"formally related.\\\" The assumption of a common formal framework is apparently unsound. The notion of \\\"inverse optics\\\" is misleading. A fair fraction of the population appears to lack monocular stereopsis as intuitive awareness. It suggests an as-yet unrecognized, but perhaps common variety of aphantasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I-Perception\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"20416695241267371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11372779/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I-Perception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241267371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695241267371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pictorial awareness is addressed through experimental phenomenology involving over 90 naïve participants. Since one can't look at the "same" picture twice the study uses one-shot trials. The participant's fascination for the duration of a session is held through the artistic principle of theme and variation. Six variations focus on the theme of pictorial geometry, both two-dimensional and three-dimensional. Major findings are: Idiosyncratic deviations from veridical are huge as compared to common textbook "effects." Observers wield arbitrary heuristics for tasks that are "formally related." The assumption of a common formal framework is apparently unsound. The notion of "inverse optics" is misleading. A fair fraction of the population appears to lack monocular stereopsis as intuitive awareness. It suggests an as-yet unrecognized, but perhaps common variety of aphantasia.