在阿拉伯/中东北非裔美国人中验证 "应对歧视量表"。

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1037/cdp0000706
Katherine Sadek, Germine H Awad, Ashley M Bennett
{"title":"在阿拉伯/中东北非裔美国人中验证 \"应对歧视量表\"。","authors":"Katherine Sadek, Germine H Awad, Ashley M Bennett","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Arab/Middle Eastern North African (MENA) Americans experience high levels of discrimination, which is associated with greater engagement in coping strategies to alleviate the stress. The Coping with Discrimination Scale (CDS; Wei, Alvarez, et al., 2010) remains one of the only measures that assesses responses to discrimination. Given the difficulties of conducting research with Arab/MENA groups, few measures have been validated for use with this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to validate the CDS among Arab/MENA Americans.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 297 Arab/MENA Americans (<i>n</i> = 139, Christian; <i>n</i> = 158, Muslim). Overall, 143 individuals identified as men and 154 identified as women. The sample's average age was 31.2 years old (<i>SD</i> = 9.5). Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to assess the preassigned factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the CDS five-factor structure among Arab/MENA participants. All models resulted in poor fit. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then conducted to identify factors relevant to Christian and Muslim MENA Americans. EFA results were largely similar for both groups and two factors emerged: adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Preliminary reliability and incremental validity was explored. Specifically, adaptive (β = -0.11, <i>p</i> = .009) and maladaptive coping (β = 0.52, <i>p</i> < .001) predicted anxiety after accounting for participants' experiences of discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has implications for utilization of the CDS, with the EFA suggesting a more fitting two-factor structure (maladaptive and adaptive coping) and sensitive interpretation of the scale with Arab/MENA populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Coping With Discrimination Scale among Arab/Middle Eastern North African Americans.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine Sadek, Germine H Awad, Ashley M Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cdp0000706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Arab/Middle Eastern North African (MENA) Americans experience high levels of discrimination, which is associated with greater engagement in coping strategies to alleviate the stress. The Coping with Discrimination Scale (CDS; Wei, Alvarez, et al., 2010) remains one of the only measures that assesses responses to discrimination. Given the difficulties of conducting research with Arab/MENA groups, few measures have been validated for use with this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to validate the CDS among Arab/MENA Americans.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 297 Arab/MENA Americans (<i>n</i> = 139, Christian; <i>n</i> = 158, Muslim). Overall, 143 individuals identified as men and 154 identified as women. The sample's average age was 31.2 years old (<i>SD</i> = 9.5). Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to assess the preassigned factor structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the CDS five-factor structure among Arab/MENA participants. All models resulted in poor fit. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then conducted to identify factors relevant to Christian and Muslim MENA Americans. EFA results were largely similar for both groups and two factors emerged: adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Preliminary reliability and incremental validity was explored. Specifically, adaptive (β = -0.11, <i>p</i> = .009) and maladaptive coping (β = 0.52, <i>p</i> < .001) predicted anxiety after accounting for participants' experiences of discrimination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has implications for utilization of the CDS, with the EFA suggesting a more fitting two-factor structure (maladaptive and adaptive coping) and sensitive interpretation of the scale with Arab/MENA populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000706\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000706","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:阿拉伯/中东北非(MENA)裔美国人遭受歧视的程度很高,这与他们更多地采取应对策略以减轻压力有关。应对歧视量表(CDS;Wei、Alvarez 等人,2010 年)仍然是评估歧视反应的唯一量表之一。鉴于对阿拉伯/中东和北非群体开展研究的困难,很少有针对该群体的测量方法经过验证。因此,本研究的目的是在美国阿拉伯人/MENA 人中验证 CDS:样本包括 297 名美国阿拉伯人/MENA 人(n = 139,基督徒;n = 158,穆斯林)。其中男性 143 人,女性 154 人。样本的平均年龄为 31.2 岁(SD = 9.5)。我们采用了确认性因子分析来评估预设的因子结构:结果:在阿拉伯/中东和北非参与者中使用了确认性因素分析来测试 CDS 的五因素结构。所有模型的拟合度都不高。然后进行了探索性因子分析(EFA),以确定与基督教和穆斯林中东和北非裔美国人相关的因子。两个群体的 EFA 结果基本相似,并出现了两个因子:适应性应对策略和适应不良应对策略。研究还探讨了初步的可靠性和增量有效性。具体而言,在考虑了参与者的歧视经历后,适应性应对策略(β = -0.11,p = .009)和适应不良应对策略(β = 0.52,p < .001)预测了焦虑:本研究对 CDS 的使用具有启示意义,EFA 表明双因素结构(适应不良和适应性应对)更适合阿拉伯/中东和北非人群,对量表的解释也更敏感。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the Coping With Discrimination Scale among Arab/Middle Eastern North African Americans.

Objectives: Arab/Middle Eastern North African (MENA) Americans experience high levels of discrimination, which is associated with greater engagement in coping strategies to alleviate the stress. The Coping with Discrimination Scale (CDS; Wei, Alvarez, et al., 2010) remains one of the only measures that assesses responses to discrimination. Given the difficulties of conducting research with Arab/MENA groups, few measures have been validated for use with this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to validate the CDS among Arab/MENA Americans.

Method: The sample consisted of 297 Arab/MENA Americans (n = 139, Christian; n = 158, Muslim). Overall, 143 individuals identified as men and 154 identified as women. The sample's average age was 31.2 years old (SD = 9.5). Confirmatory factor analysis was utilized to assess the preassigned factor structure.

Results: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the CDS five-factor structure among Arab/MENA participants. All models resulted in poor fit. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was then conducted to identify factors relevant to Christian and Muslim MENA Americans. EFA results were largely similar for both groups and two factors emerged: adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies. Preliminary reliability and incremental validity was explored. Specifically, adaptive (β = -0.11, p = .009) and maladaptive coping (β = 0.52, p < .001) predicted anxiety after accounting for participants' experiences of discrimination.

Conclusion: This study has implications for utilization of the CDS, with the EFA suggesting a more fitting two-factor structure (maladaptive and adaptive coping) and sensitive interpretation of the scale with Arab/MENA populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
期刊最新文献
Through the eyes of my peers: Sharing perceptions of unequal treatment in ethno-racially diverse classrooms. Contextualizing linguistic acculturation and alcohol use among Hispanic college students in the social digital environment. Correction to "The development of Tibetan children's racial bias in empathy: The mediating role of ethnic identity and wrongfulness of ethnic intergroup bias" by Sheng et al. (2024). Examining the indirect effects of acculturation stress on insomnia through rumination and alcohol use among Latinx women and men. Moral judgments of outgroup cultural use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1