衡量早期现代欧洲戏剧中的主角地位:苏菲妮丝芭角色的远距离解读

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER COMPARATIVE DRAMA Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1353/cdr.2024.a936320
David J. Amelang
{"title":"衡量早期现代欧洲戏剧中的主角地位:苏菲妮丝芭角色的远距离解读","authors":"David J. Amelang","doi":"10.1353/cdr.2024.a936320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: <span>A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David J. Amelang (bio) </li> </ul> <h2>Introduction</h2> <p><strong>A</strong>ny person taking their first steps into the wide and complex world of early modern comparative theatre history immediately confronts one basic fact: that during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Europe was divided into territories that allowed women to act professionally and territories that banned them from doing so. In the commercial theatres of Shakespeare’s England, most famously, adolescent boys were charged with performing all female roles, whereas at exactly the same time in countries such as Italy, France, and Spain actresses were considered the stars of their industries. This division was not sculpted in stone, with some nations wavering back and forth on how to handle what authorities broadly perceived as a choice between the lesser of two evils: having either women or young cross-dressed men commanding attention on the nation’s public stages. Needless to say, depending on which laws and customs were in effect, dramatists had to adapt and adjust the way they wrote plays to the realities—and limitations—of their cultures of performance. It stands to reason that it would have been quite different to create a role for a young boy who was just getting started in the business of playing than for an established celebrity actress who was broadly seen as the main attraction in the eyes of the theatregoing public. <strong>[End Page 367]</strong></p> <p>Unable to shake this thought, I quickly became fixated with trying to identify and trace the different factors that influenced the prominence of female roles in the plays of early modern Europe. Fall 2021 saw the online release of <em>Rolecall</em> (http://www.rolecall.eu), an open-access database which I developed as a way of charting the plays and characters of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European theatre. Its original purpose was to encourage scholars and students of Renaissance and Baroque theatre comparatively to explore the constellations of characters in early modern Europe’s dramatic corpora, with a particular focus on their gender dynamics. Did the presence or absence of actresses in one or another country affect the type of female characters their dramatic traditions ended up featuring? Did plays written by female playwrights feature lengthier female roles than those of their male counterparts? Is there a considerable difference between the number of female leads in the plays written for the Globe-like amphitheatres of suburban London, in which all female playgoers had to be accompanied by a male chaperone, as opposed to the elite indoor playhouses of the City that allowed for more women in the audience? These are the initial questions this Digital Humanities project was designed to answer.</p> <p>The first and current iteration of the online platform offers a breakdown of the characters in each dramatic text, presented as either male or female (according to how the original text identifies them), and organized according to the length of each part. As the first stage of the project comes to a close, and after having analyzed approximately 2,800 plays from seven different countries (England, France, Germany Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain), the intention now is to take another step and broaden <em>Rolecall</em> further into a digital venture with the capability to offer greater nuance and understanding. That is, beyond expanding the corpus to include more dramatists from different countries and periods, there is a plan underway to reframe our theoretical infrastructure so as to allow for a more adequate representation of the broader complexities of the gender spectrum. <sup>1</sup> Furthermore, the intention is to expand our range of measurements beyond role length to include other possible barometers of protagonism. With this latter purpose in mind, this article offers an early glimpse into the development of a selection of quantitative instruments designed to encapsulate a broader range of ways in which a dramatic <strong>[End Page 368]</strong> character can be deemed a protagonist in an early modern play. The first half of the study outlines the function and functionality of the indicators of dramatic protagonism being considered; the second presents a case study that surveys eleven plays written during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries which...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":39600,"journal":{"name":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba\",\"authors\":\"David J. Amelang\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/cdr.2024.a936320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: <span>A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> David J. Amelang (bio) </li> </ul> <h2>Introduction</h2> <p><strong>A</strong>ny person taking their first steps into the wide and complex world of early modern comparative theatre history immediately confronts one basic fact: that during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Europe was divided into territories that allowed women to act professionally and territories that banned them from doing so. In the commercial theatres of Shakespeare’s England, most famously, adolescent boys were charged with performing all female roles, whereas at exactly the same time in countries such as Italy, France, and Spain actresses were considered the stars of their industries. This division was not sculpted in stone, with some nations wavering back and forth on how to handle what authorities broadly perceived as a choice between the lesser of two evils: having either women or young cross-dressed men commanding attention on the nation’s public stages. Needless to say, depending on which laws and customs were in effect, dramatists had to adapt and adjust the way they wrote plays to the realities—and limitations—of their cultures of performance. It stands to reason that it would have been quite different to create a role for a young boy who was just getting started in the business of playing than for an established celebrity actress who was broadly seen as the main attraction in the eyes of the theatregoing public. <strong>[End Page 367]</strong></p> <p>Unable to shake this thought, I quickly became fixated with trying to identify and trace the different factors that influenced the prominence of female roles in the plays of early modern Europe. Fall 2021 saw the online release of <em>Rolecall</em> (http://www.rolecall.eu), an open-access database which I developed as a way of charting the plays and characters of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European theatre. Its original purpose was to encourage scholars and students of Renaissance and Baroque theatre comparatively to explore the constellations of characters in early modern Europe’s dramatic corpora, with a particular focus on their gender dynamics. Did the presence or absence of actresses in one or another country affect the type of female characters their dramatic traditions ended up featuring? Did plays written by female playwrights feature lengthier female roles than those of their male counterparts? Is there a considerable difference between the number of female leads in the plays written for the Globe-like amphitheatres of suburban London, in which all female playgoers had to be accompanied by a male chaperone, as opposed to the elite indoor playhouses of the City that allowed for more women in the audience? These are the initial questions this Digital Humanities project was designed to answer.</p> <p>The first and current iteration of the online platform offers a breakdown of the characters in each dramatic text, presented as either male or female (according to how the original text identifies them), and organized according to the length of each part. As the first stage of the project comes to a close, and after having analyzed approximately 2,800 plays from seven different countries (England, France, Germany Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain), the intention now is to take another step and broaden <em>Rolecall</em> further into a digital venture with the capability to offer greater nuance and understanding. That is, beyond expanding the corpus to include more dramatists from different countries and periods, there is a plan underway to reframe our theoretical infrastructure so as to allow for a more adequate representation of the broader complexities of the gender spectrum. <sup>1</sup> Furthermore, the intention is to expand our range of measurements beyond role length to include other possible barometers of protagonism. With this latter purpose in mind, this article offers an early glimpse into the development of a selection of quantitative instruments designed to encapsulate a broader range of ways in which a dramatic <strong>[End Page 368]</strong> character can be deemed a protagonist in an early modern play. The first half of the study outlines the function and functionality of the indicators of dramatic protagonism being considered; the second presents a case study that surveys eleven plays written during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries which...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COMPARATIVE DRAMA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a936320\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COMPARATIVE DRAMA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2024.a936320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 衡量早期现代欧洲戏剧中的主角地位:大卫-J.-阿梅朗(David J. Amelang)(简历) 引言 任何初涉现代早期比较戏剧史这一广阔而复杂的世界的人都会立即面对一个基本事实:在 16 世纪和 17 世纪,欧洲被划分为允许女性从事职业表演的地区和禁止女性从事职业表演的地区。最著名的是,在莎士比亚时代英国的商业剧院中,青少年男孩负责表演所有女性角色,而恰恰在同一时期,在意大利、法国和西班牙等国家,女演员被视为其行业的明星。这种划分并非一成不变,一些国家在如何处理当局普遍认为的 "两害相权取其轻 "的问题上摇摆不定:在国家的公共舞台上,要么是女性,要么是年轻的异装男子。毋庸置疑,根据当时的法律和习俗,剧作家们必须调整自己的剧本创作方式,以适应现实情况和表演文化的局限性。因此,为一个刚刚开始演戏的小男孩创造一个角色,与为一个在戏剧观众心目中具有广泛知名度的女演员创造一个角色,是完全不同的。[由于无法摆脱这种想法,我很快就专注于试图找出并追溯影响女性角色在早期现代欧洲戏剧中的地位的不同因素。2021 年秋季,我开发了一个开放式数据库 Rolecall (http://www.rolecall.eu),用于绘制十六和十七世纪欧洲戏剧的剧目和角色图表。其初衷是鼓励研究文艺复兴和巴洛克戏剧的学者和学生对欧洲早期现代戏剧中的角色进行比较研究,尤其关注其性别动态。一个国家或另一个国家女演员的存在与否是否会影响其戏剧传统中女性角色的类型?女性剧作家创作的剧本中女性角色的篇幅是否比男性剧作家的剧本长?在为伦敦郊区类似环球剧场的露天剧场创作的戏剧中,所有女性观众都必须有男性陪同,而在伦敦市的精英室内剧场,观众中允许有更多女性,两者之间的女性主角数量是否存在很大差异?这些就是数字人文项目旨在回答的最初问题。在线平台的第一个版本也是目前的版本提供了每个戏剧文本中的人物分类,以男性或女性(根据原文的识别方式)呈现,并根据每个部分的长度进行编排。随着该项目的第一阶段接近尾声,在分析了来自七个不同国家(英国、法国、德国、意大利、荷兰、葡萄牙和西班牙)的大约 2800 部戏剧之后,我们现在打算再迈出一步,将 Rolecall 进一步扩展为一个数字项目,使其能够提供更多的细微差别和理解。也就是说,除了扩大语料库,纳入更多来自不同国家和时期的戏剧家之外,我们还计划重新构建我们的理论基础架构,以便更充分地体现性别光谱的广泛复杂性。1 此外,我们还打算扩大我们的衡量范围,从角色长度扩展到其他可能的主角衡量标准。考虑到后一个目的,本文将提供一个初步的视角,来探讨如何开发一些定量工具,以囊括更广泛的方式,使戏剧 [尾页 368]人物在早期现代戏剧中被视为主角。研究的前半部分概述了所考虑的戏剧主角指标的功能和作用;后半部分介绍了一项案例研究,该研究调查了 16 世纪和 17 世纪创作的 11 部戏剧,这些戏剧...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba
  • David J. Amelang (bio)

Introduction

Any person taking their first steps into the wide and complex world of early modern comparative theatre history immediately confronts one basic fact: that during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Europe was divided into territories that allowed women to act professionally and territories that banned them from doing so. In the commercial theatres of Shakespeare’s England, most famously, adolescent boys were charged with performing all female roles, whereas at exactly the same time in countries such as Italy, France, and Spain actresses were considered the stars of their industries. This division was not sculpted in stone, with some nations wavering back and forth on how to handle what authorities broadly perceived as a choice between the lesser of two evils: having either women or young cross-dressed men commanding attention on the nation’s public stages. Needless to say, depending on which laws and customs were in effect, dramatists had to adapt and adjust the way they wrote plays to the realities—and limitations—of their cultures of performance. It stands to reason that it would have been quite different to create a role for a young boy who was just getting started in the business of playing than for an established celebrity actress who was broadly seen as the main attraction in the eyes of the theatregoing public. [End Page 367]

Unable to shake this thought, I quickly became fixated with trying to identify and trace the different factors that influenced the prominence of female roles in the plays of early modern Europe. Fall 2021 saw the online release of Rolecall (http://www.rolecall.eu), an open-access database which I developed as a way of charting the plays and characters of sixteenth- and seventeenth-century European theatre. Its original purpose was to encourage scholars and students of Renaissance and Baroque theatre comparatively to explore the constellations of characters in early modern Europe’s dramatic corpora, with a particular focus on their gender dynamics. Did the presence or absence of actresses in one or another country affect the type of female characters their dramatic traditions ended up featuring? Did plays written by female playwrights feature lengthier female roles than those of their male counterparts? Is there a considerable difference between the number of female leads in the plays written for the Globe-like amphitheatres of suburban London, in which all female playgoers had to be accompanied by a male chaperone, as opposed to the elite indoor playhouses of the City that allowed for more women in the audience? These are the initial questions this Digital Humanities project was designed to answer.

The first and current iteration of the online platform offers a breakdown of the characters in each dramatic text, presented as either male or female (according to how the original text identifies them), and organized according to the length of each part. As the first stage of the project comes to a close, and after having analyzed approximately 2,800 plays from seven different countries (England, France, Germany Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain), the intention now is to take another step and broaden Rolecall further into a digital venture with the capability to offer greater nuance and understanding. That is, beyond expanding the corpus to include more dramatists from different countries and periods, there is a plan underway to reframe our theoretical infrastructure so as to allow for a more adequate representation of the broader complexities of the gender spectrum. 1 Furthermore, the intention is to expand our range of measurements beyond role length to include other possible barometers of protagonism. With this latter purpose in mind, this article offers an early glimpse into the development of a selection of quantitative instruments designed to encapsulate a broader range of ways in which a dramatic [End Page 368] character can be deemed a protagonist in an early modern play. The first half of the study outlines the function and functionality of the indicators of dramatic protagonism being considered; the second presents a case study that surveys eleven plays written during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries which...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COMPARATIVE DRAMA
COMPARATIVE DRAMA Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Comparative Drama (ISSN 0010-4078) is a scholarly journal devoted to studies international in spirit and interdisciplinary in scope; it is published quarterly (Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter) at Western Michigan University
期刊最新文献
In Memoriam: Clifford O. Davidson: 1932–2024 "Simply Sitting in a Chair": Questioning Representational Practice and Dramatic Convention in Marguerite Duras's L'Amante anglaise and The Viaducts of Seine-et-Oise Rewriting Idolatry: Doctor Faustus and Romeo and Juliet Measuring Protagonism in Early Modern European Theatre: A Distant Reading of the Character of Sophonisba Theater, War, and Revolution in Eighteenth-Century France and Its Empire by Logan J. Connors (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1