高级实践医师如何支持医学教育研究生的教育并为其做出贡献:批判性文献综述。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858
Andrea M Barker, Abigail W Konopasky, Lara Varpio, Michael Soh, Brian R Poole, Renée E Stalmeijer
{"title":"高级实践医师如何支持医学教育研究生的教育并为其做出贡献:批判性文献综述。","authors":"Andrea M Barker, Abigail W Konopasky, Lara Varpio, Michael Soh, Brian R Poole, Renée E Stalmeijer","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the introduction of physician assistants and nurse practitioners (i.e., advanced practice clinicians [APCs]), the landscape of graduate medical education (GME) has fundamentally changed. Whereas APCs' role in GME settings has been mainly described as substitutes for postgraduate medical trainees, APCs are increasingly considered integrated and collaborative team members. However, APCs' contributions to trainees' education and learning remain underexplored. This critical review synthesized the literature available on how APCs contribute to trainees' workplace learning and how these contributions are enabled.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception dates to April 2023 for published articles reporting on educational or guiding behaviors of APCs in GME contexts, resulting in 1,830 articles for possible inclusion. Using a critical review approach, the analysis was informed by a previously published framework describing workplace guidance behaviors and the authors' clinical and research expertise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 articles were included in the study. Advanced practice clinicians contribute to trainees' workplace learning through a variety of guidance behaviors, including learning from patient care, demonstrating, support, socialization, feedback, involvement in evaluations, and other unspecified contributions. Thematic analysis indicated that APCs' contributions were enabled by their close working relationships with trainees, their unique perspective within the workplace, and the extent to which they were formally incorporated within workplace learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This critical review offers a concrete description of ways APCs are contributing to trainees' learning and education in the GME workplace across the literature. These results suggest that APCs could be a potentially untapped source for further optimizing workplace learning. However, unlocking this potential will require a shift in the conceptualization of APCs' role in the workplace. Opportunities for APC professional development and formalization of APCs' educational role should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1286-1297"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Advanced Practice Clinicians Support Education for and Contribute to Education of Graduate Medical Education Trainees: A Critical Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea M Barker, Abigail W Konopasky, Lara Varpio, Michael Soh, Brian R Poole, Renée E Stalmeijer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With the introduction of physician assistants and nurse practitioners (i.e., advanced practice clinicians [APCs]), the landscape of graduate medical education (GME) has fundamentally changed. Whereas APCs' role in GME settings has been mainly described as substitutes for postgraduate medical trainees, APCs are increasingly considered integrated and collaborative team members. However, APCs' contributions to trainees' education and learning remain underexplored. This critical review synthesized the literature available on how APCs contribute to trainees' workplace learning and how these contributions are enabled.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception dates to April 2023 for published articles reporting on educational or guiding behaviors of APCs in GME contexts, resulting in 1,830 articles for possible inclusion. Using a critical review approach, the analysis was informed by a previously published framework describing workplace guidance behaviors and the authors' clinical and research expertise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 58 articles were included in the study. Advanced practice clinicians contribute to trainees' workplace learning through a variety of guidance behaviors, including learning from patient care, demonstrating, support, socialization, feedback, involvement in evaluations, and other unspecified contributions. Thematic analysis indicated that APCs' contributions were enabled by their close working relationships with trainees, their unique perspective within the workplace, and the extent to which they were formally incorporated within workplace learning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This critical review offers a concrete description of ways APCs are contributing to trainees' learning and education in the GME workplace across the literature. These results suggest that APCs could be a potentially untapped source for further optimizing workplace learning. However, unlocking this potential will require a shift in the conceptualization of APCs' role in the workplace. Opportunities for APC professional development and formalization of APCs' educational role should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1286-1297\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005858","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:随着医师助理和执业护士(即高级实践临床医师 [APC])的引入,研究生医学教育(GME)的格局发生了根本性的变化。过去,APCs 在 GME 中的角色主要被描述为医学研究生受训者的替代品,而现在,APCs 越来越多地被视为综合协作团队的成员。然而,APC 对学员教育和学习的贡献仍未得到充分探讨。本评论综述了有关进修人员如何促进受训人员工作场所学习以及如何促成这些贡献的现有文献:作者检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL和PsycINFO数据库中从数据库开始日期到2023年4月发表的文章,以寻找在GME背景下报告APC的教育或指导行为的文章,结果有1830篇文章可能被纳入。分析采用批判性综述方法,参考了之前发表的描述工作场所指导行为的框架以及作者的临床和研究专长:研究共收录了 58 篇文章。高级临床医师通过各种指导行为促进受训者的职场学习,包括从患者护理中学习、示范、支持、社交、反馈、参与评估以及其他未指明的贡献。专题分析表明,全科医生的贡献得益于他们与受训者的密切工作关系、他们在工作场所的独特视角以及他们被正式纳入工作场所学习的程度:这篇评论性综述具体描述了 APCs 在全球医学教育工作场所为学员的学习和教育做出贡献的方式。这些结果表明,APCs 可能是进一步优化工作场所学习的一个尚未开发的潜在来源。然而,要发掘这一潜力,就必须转变对培训中心在工作场所的作用的认识。应考虑为培训中心的专业发展和培训中心教育角色的正规化提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Advanced Practice Clinicians Support Education for and Contribute to Education of Graduate Medical Education Trainees: A Critical Literature Review.

Purpose: With the introduction of physician assistants and nurse practitioners (i.e., advanced practice clinicians [APCs]), the landscape of graduate medical education (GME) has fundamentally changed. Whereas APCs' role in GME settings has been mainly described as substitutes for postgraduate medical trainees, APCs are increasingly considered integrated and collaborative team members. However, APCs' contributions to trainees' education and learning remain underexplored. This critical review synthesized the literature available on how APCs contribute to trainees' workplace learning and how these contributions are enabled.

Method: The authors searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from database inception dates to April 2023 for published articles reporting on educational or guiding behaviors of APCs in GME contexts, resulting in 1,830 articles for possible inclusion. Using a critical review approach, the analysis was informed by a previously published framework describing workplace guidance behaviors and the authors' clinical and research expertise.

Results: A total of 58 articles were included in the study. Advanced practice clinicians contribute to trainees' workplace learning through a variety of guidance behaviors, including learning from patient care, demonstrating, support, socialization, feedback, involvement in evaluations, and other unspecified contributions. Thematic analysis indicated that APCs' contributions were enabled by their close working relationships with trainees, their unique perspective within the workplace, and the extent to which they were formally incorporated within workplace learning.

Conclusions: This critical review offers a concrete description of ways APCs are contributing to trainees' learning and education in the GME workplace across the literature. These results suggest that APCs could be a potentially untapped source for further optimizing workplace learning. However, unlocking this potential will require a shift in the conceptualization of APCs' role in the workplace. Opportunities for APC professional development and formalization of APCs' educational role should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Validating the 2023 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Leadership Competencies. World Federation for Medical Education Recognizes 5 International Accrediting Bodies. Irony. Teaching Opportunities for Postgraduate Trainees in Primary Care. How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1